Tissue proteomics using capillary isoelectric focusing-based multidimensional separations

References

• Conti M, Gelfi C, Righetti PG. Screening of umbilical cord blood hemoglobins by isoelectric focusing in capillaries. Electrophoresis 16, 1485–1491 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Berger SJ, Anderson GA, Smith RD. High-efficiency capillary isoelectric focusing of peptides. Anal. Chem. 72, 2154–2159 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan D, Lee CS. Extension of separation range in capillary isoelectric focusing for resolving highly basic biomolecules. J. Chromatogr. A 979, 271–276 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddings JC. United Separation Science. John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Baehrecke EH, Shen Y, Smith RD, Lee CS. Integration of capillary isoelectric focusing with capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography for two-dimensional proteomics separation. Electrophoresis 23, 3143–3148 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Balgley BM, DeVoe DL, Lee CS. Capillary isoelectric focusing-based multidimensional concentration/separation platform for ultrasensitive proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 75, 3145–3152 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR III. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 73, 5683–5690 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Prot. Res. 2, 43–50 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essader AS, Cargile BJ, Bundy JL, Stephenson JL Jr. A comparison of immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing and strong-cation-exchange chromatography as a first dimension in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 5, 24–34 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile BJ, Stephenson JL Jr. An alternative to tandem mass spectrometry: isoelectric point and accurate mass for the identification of peptides. Anal. Chem. 76, 267–275 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Griffin TJ, Eng J, Aebersold R. Proteome analysis of low-abundance proteins using multidimensional chromatography and isotope-coded affinity tags. J. Prot. Res. 1, 47–54 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerBerkmoes NC, Bundy JL, Hauser L et al. Integrating ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ mass spectrometric approaches for proteomic analysis of Shewanella Oneidensis. J. Prot. Res. 1, 239–252 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile BJ, Talley DL, Stephenson JL Jr. Immobilized pH gradients as a first dimension in shotgun proteomics and analysis of the accuracy of pI predictability of peptides. Electrophoresis 25, 936–945 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmert-Buck MR, Bonner RF, Smith PD et al. Laser capture microdissection. Science 274, 998–1001 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner RF, Emmert-Buck MR, Cole K et al. Laser capture microdissection: molecular analysis of tissue. Science 278, 1481–1483 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSouza AI, McGregor E, Dunn MJ, Rose ML. Preparation of human heart for laser microdissection and proteomics. Proteomics 4, 578–586 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuta M, Weil RJ, Vortmeyer AO et al. Protein patterns and proteins that identify subtype of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncogene 23, 6806–6814 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Z, Lee YS, Zeng W et al. Molecular genetic and proteomic analysis of synchronous malignant gliomas. Neurology 62, 2316–2319 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paweletz CP, Trock B, Pennanen M et al. Proteomic patterns of nipple aspirate fluids obtained by SELDI-TOF: potential for new biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Dis. Markers 17, 301–307 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF, Zoon KC, Kohn EC, Barrett JC, Liotta LA. Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality. Nature Rev. 1, 683–695 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfkuhle JD, Liotta LA, Petricoin EF. Proteomic applications for the early detection of cancer. Nature Rev. 3, 267–275 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Cottingham K. Clinical proteomics: are we there yet? Anal. Chem. 75, 472A–476A (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven RA, Totty N, Harnden P, Selby PJ, Banks RE. Laser capture microdissection and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: evaluation of tissue preparation and sample limitations. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 815–822 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouledous L, Hunt S, Harcourt R, Harry JL, Williams KL, Gutstein HB. Lack of compatibility of histological staining methods with proteomic analysis of laser-capture microdissected brain samples. J. Biomol. Tech. 13, 258–264 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahram M, Flaig MJ, Gillespie JW et al. Evaluation of ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues for proteomic applications. Proteomics 3, 413–421 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somiari RI, Sullivan A, Russell S et al. High-throughput proteomic analysis of human infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. Proteomics 3, 1863–1873 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SL, Hancock WS, Goodrich GG, Kunitake ST. An approach to the proteomic analysis of a breast cancer cell line (SKBR-3). Proteomics 3, 1037–1046 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang L, Toy DP, Hancock WS, Sgroi DC, Karger BL. Proteomic analysis of ductal carcinoma of the breast using laser capture microdissection, LC-MS, and 16O/18O isotopic labeling. J. Prot. Res. 3, 604–612 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Serfass L, Roy MO, Wong J, Bonneau AM, Georges E. Annexin-I expression modulates drug resistance in tumor cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 314, 565–570 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicek M, Samant RS, Kinter M, Welch DR, Casery G. Identification of metastasis-associated proteins through protein analysis of metastatic MDA-MB-435 and metastasis-suppressed BRMS1 transfected-MDA-MB-435 cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 21, 149–157 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese C, Rolletschek A, Kania G et al. Nestin expression – a property of multi-lineage progenitor cells? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61, 2510–2522 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SK, Messam CA, Spengler BA, Biedler JL, Ross RA. Nestin is a potential mediator of malignancy in human neuroblastoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 27994–27999 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masselon C, Anderson GA, Harkewicz R, Bruce JE, Paša-Tolic L, Smith RD. Accurate mass multiplexed tandem mass spectrometry for high-throughput polypeptide identification from mixtures. Anal. Chem. 72, 1918–1924 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvine S, Eppel JT, Yi EC, Goodlett DR. Shotgun collision-induced dissociation of peptides using a time of flight mass analyzer. Proteomics 3, 847–850 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JD, Flanagan M, Lopez L, Fischer S, Miller LA. Using accurate mass electrospray ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometer with in-source collision-induced dissociation to sequence peptide mixtures. J. Chromatogr. A 1020, 11–26 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable JD, Dong MQ, Wohlschlegel J, Dillin A, Yates JR III. Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nature Methods 1, 39–45 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Vachet RW. Multiplexed MS/MS in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 76, 7346–7353 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Balgley BM, Rudnick PA, Evans EL, DeVoe DL, Lee CS. Integrated capillary isoelectric focusing/nano-reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with ESI-MS for characterization of intact yeast proteins. J. Prot. Res. 4, 36–42 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams TL, Callahan JH, Monday SR, Feng PCH, Musser SM. Relative quantitation of intact proteins of bacterial cell extracts using coextracted proteins as internal standards. Anal. Chem. 76, 1002–1007 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall DB, Kachman MT, Gong S et al. Isoelectric focusing nonporous RP HPLC: a two-dimensional liquid-phase separation method for mapping of cellular proteins with identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 72, 1099–1111 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachman MT, Wang H, Schwartz DR, Cho KR, Lubman DM. A 2-D liquid separations/mass mapping methods for interlysate comparison of ovarian cancers. Anal. Chem. 74, 1779–1791 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kim J, Yoo C, Miller FR, Lubman DM. High sequence coverage of proteins isolated from liquid separations of breast cancer cells using capillary electrophoresis-time-of-flight MS and MALDI-TOF MS mapping. Anal. Chem. 75, 6209–6217 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Echan L, Hembach P et al. Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins. Electrophoresis 22, 1603–1615 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Subramanian B, Nakeff A, Barder TJ, Parus SJ, Lubman DM. A comparison of drug-treated and untreated HCT-116 human colon adenocarcinoma cells using a 2-D liquid separation mapping method based upon chromatofocusing pI fractionation. Anal. Chem. 75, 2299–2308 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou F, Johnston MV. Protein characterization by on-line capillary isoelectric focusing, reversed-phase liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76, 2734–2740 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Du Y, Miller LM, Patrie SM, Robinson DE, Kelleher NL. Molecular-level description of proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae using quadrupole FT hybrid mass spectrometry for top down proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 2852–2858 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Meng F, Patrie SM, Miller LM, Kelleher NL. Improved molecular weight-based processing of intact proteins for interrogation by quadrupole-enhanced FT MS/MS. J. Prot. Res. 3, 801–806 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz RL, Ji H, Schutz F et al. A proteome strategy for fractionating proteins and peptides using continuous free-flow electrophoresis coupled off-line to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 76, 4811–4824 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Ulaszek R, Deciu C, Schieltz DM, Yates JR III. Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal. Chem. 74, 1650–1657 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paša-Tolic L, Jensen PK, Anderson GA et al. High throughput proteome-wide precision measurements of protein expression using mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 7949–7950 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han DK, Eng J, Zhou H, Aebersold R. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nature Biotech. 19, 946–951 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C. Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 73, 2836–2842 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münchbach M, Quadroni M, Miotto G, James P. Quantitation and facilitated de novo sequencing of proteins by isotopic N-terminal labeling of peptides with a fragmentation-directing moiety. Anal. Chem. 72, 4047–4057 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnier FE, Riggs L, Zhang R et al. Comparative proteomics based on stable isotope labeling and affinity selection. J. Mass Spectrom. 37, 133–145 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarenko PV, Chelius D, Shaler TA. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 74, 4741–4749 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhou H, Lin H et al. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal. Chem. 75, 4818–4826 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelius D, Zhang T, Wang G, Shen RF. Global protein identification and quantification technology using two-dimensional liquid chromatography nanospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 6658–6665 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar