Sperm proteomics: potential impact on male infertility treatment

References

• World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mahutte NG, Arici A. Failed fertilization: is it predictable?. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;15(3):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 2004;81(5):1289–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2006;21(11):2876–2881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2014;102(4):998–1005.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Pan C, Fei Q, et al. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on the clinical outcomes for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with different ovarian reserves. Fertil. Steril. 2015;103(4):910–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, et al. Differential proteomic profiling of spermatozoal proteins of infertile men with unilateral or bilateral varicocele. Urology. 2015;85(3):580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barazani Y, Agarwal A, Sabanegh ES. Functional sperm testing and the role of proteomics in the evaluation of male infertility. Urology. 2014;84(2):255–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intasqui P, Camargo M, Del Giudice PT, et al. Unraveling the sperm proteome and post-genomic pathways associated with sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013;30(9):1187–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant TM, Zeleznik AJ. Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction: Two-Volume Set. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gadella BM, Boerke A. An update on post-ejaculatory remodeling of the sperm surface before mammalian fertilization. Theriogenology. 2016;85(1):113–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagdas SK, Smith L, Mcnamara A, et al. Identification and characterization of a bovine sperm acrosomal matrix protein and its mechanism of interaction with acrosomal hydrolases. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2015;410:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson DW, Way AL, Bertolla RP, et al. Influence of osteopontin, casein and oviductal fluid on bovine sperm capacitation. Anim Reprod. 2007;4(3/4):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves RF, Wolinetz CD, Killian GJ. Influence of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD), integrins (αV and α5) and osteopontin on bovine sperm–egg binding, and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology. 2007;67(3):468–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amours O, Frenette G, Bordeleau L-J, et al. Epididymosomes transfer epididymal sperm binding protein 1 (ELSPBP1) to dead spermatozoa during epididymal transit in bovine. Biology of Reproduction. 2012;87(4):94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girouard J, Frenette G, Sullivan R. Comparative proteome and lipid profiles of bovine epididymosomes collected in the intraluminal compartment of the caput and cauda epididymidis. Int. J. Andrology. 2011;34(5pt2):e475–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan R, Frenette G, Girouard J. Epididymosomes are involved in the acquisition of new sperm proteins during epididymal transit. Asian J. Andrology. 2007;9(4):483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryawanshi AR, Khan SA, Joshi CS, et al. Epididymosome-mediated acquisition of MMSDH, an androgen-dependent and developmentally regulated epididymal sperm protein. J. Androl. 2012;33(5):963–974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aalberts M, Van Dissel-Emiliani FMF, Van Adrichem NPH, et al. Identification of distinct populations of prostasomes that differentially express prostate stem cell antigen, annexin A1, and GLIPR2 in humans. Biol. Reprod. 2012;86(3):82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalberts M, Sostaric E, Wubbolts R, et al. Spermatozoa recruit prostasomes in response to capacitation induction. (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2013;1834(11):2326–2335. * One important finding that showed the role of exosomes (prostasomes) in sperm capacitation
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagawa K, Sugimura K, Kuratsukuri K, et al. Norepinephrine activates P44 and P42 MAPK in human prostate stromal and smooth muscle cells but not in epithelial cells. The Prostate. 2003;56(4):313–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meggiolaro D, Porcelli F, Carnevali A, et al. A possible role of Fas antigen in ejaculated spermatozoa of fertile bulls: an immunocytochemical quantitative approach. Acta Histochemica. 2006;107(6):463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said T, Agarwal A, Grunewald S, et al. Selection of nonapoptotic spermatozoa as a new tool for enhancing assisted reproduction outcomes: an in vitro model. Biol. Reprod. 2006;74(3):530–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcelli F, Meggiolaro D, Carnevali A, et al. Fas ligand in bull ejaculated spermatozoa: A quantitative immunocytochemical study. Acta Histochemica. 2006;108(4):287–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Fonslow BR, Shan B, et al. Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chem. Rev. 2013;113(4):2343–2394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermeier R. Looking at proteins from two dimensions: a review on five decades of 2D electrophoresis. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2014;120(5):168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JC, Killian GJ. Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of rat sperm membrane interaction with cauda epididymal fluid. J. Androl. 1989;10(1):64–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Lemeer S, Savitski MM, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012;404(4):939–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick P, Kuster B. Proteomics a pragmatic perspective. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28(7):695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherl A. Clinical protein mass spectrometry. Methods. 2015;81: 3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington SR, Wilkins MR, Hochstrasser DF, et al. Proteome analysis: from protein characterization to biological function. Trends Cell Biol. 1997;7(4):168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland AM, Janech MG, Almeida JS, et al. Sources of variability among replicate samples separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Biomol. Tech. JBT. 2010;21(1):3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choe LH, Lee KH. Quantitative and qualitative measure of intralaboratory two-dimensional protein gel reproducibility and the effects of sample preparation, sample load, and image analysis. Electrophoresis. 2003;24(1920):3500–3507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López JL. Two-dimensional electrophoresis in proteome expression analysis. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life. Sci. 2007;849(1–2):190–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse CM, Dreyer RN, Yamashita M, et al. Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers. Anal. Chem. 1985;57(3):675–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Mann M. Quantitative high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011;80:273–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karas M, Bachmann D, Hillenkamp F. Influence of the wavelength in high-irradiance ultraviolet laser desorption mass spectrometry of organic molecules. Anal. Chem. 1985;57(14):2935–2939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Waki H, Ido Y, et al. Protein and polymer analyses up to m/z 100 000 by laser ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1988;2(8):151–153.
   Google Scholar
• Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, et al. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 1989;246(4926):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Camargo M, et al. Differences in the seminal plasma proteome are associated with oxidative stress levels in men with normal semen parameters. Fertil. Steril. 2015;104(2):292–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo M, Intasqui Lopes P, Del Giudice PT, et al. Unbiased label-free quantitative proteomic profiling and enriched proteomic pathways in seminal plasma of adult men before and after varicocelectomy. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2013;28(1):33–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intasqui P, Camargo M, Del Giudice PT, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation rate is associated with differential protein expression and enriched functions in human seminal plasma. BJU Int. 2013;112(6):835–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Turco EG, Souza GHMF, Garcia JS, et al. Effect of endometriosis on the protein expression pattern of follicular fluid from patients submitted to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2010;25(7):1755–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics MCP. 2012;11(6):016717. O111.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Bailey U-M, Schulz BL. Automated measurement of site-specific N-glycosylation occupancy with SWATH-MS. Proteomics. 2015;15(13):2177–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bilbao A, Bruderer T, et al. The Use of Variable Q1 Isolation Windows Improves Selectivity in LC-SWATH-MS Acquisition. J. Proteome Res. 2015;14(10):4359–4371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law KP, Lim YP. Recent advances in mass spectrometry: data independent analysis and hyper reaction monitoring. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2013;10(6):551–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliekelman P, Liu S. Quantifying the effect of competition for detection between coeluting peptides on detection probabilities in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13(2):348–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerini S, Mauri P, The role of protein and peptide separation before mass spectrometry analysis in clinical proteomics. J. Chromatogr. A. 2015;1381:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Speicher DW. Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes using microscale solution isoelectrofocusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics. 2002;2(1):58–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Hembach P, Echan L, et al. Enhanced analysis of human breast cancer proteomes using micro-scale solution isoelectrofocusing combined with high resolution 1-D and 2-D gels. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life. Sci. 2002;782(1):253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahrour O, Cobice D, Malone J. Stable isotope labelling methods in mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015;113:2–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersema PJ, Raijmakers R, Lemeer S, et al. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4(4):484–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiani S, Tamburrino L, Ricci B, et al. SUMO1 in human sperm: new targets, role in motility and morphology and relationship with DNA damage. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 2014;148(5):453–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiani S, Tamburrino L, Giuliano L, et al. Sumo1-ylation of human spermatozoa and its relationship with semen quality. Int. J. Androl. 2011;34(6 Pt 1):581–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasvandik S, Sillaste G, Velthut-Meikas A, et al. Bovine sperm plasma membrane proteomics through biotinylation and subcellular enrichment. Proteomics. 2015;15(11):1906–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amours O, Bordeleau L-J, Frenette G, et al. Binder of sperm 1 and epididymal sperm binding protein 1 are associated with different bull sperm subpopulations. Reproduction. 2012;143(6):759–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagdas SK, Winfrey VP, Olson GE. Identification of a hamster sperm 26-kilodalton dehydrogenase/reductase that is exclusively localized to the mitochondria of the flagellum. Biol. Reprod. 2006;75(2):197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraj N, Wisniewski JR, Geiger T, et al. Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7(1):548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck M, Schmidt A, Malmstroem J, et al. The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7(1):549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Las Rivas J, De Luis A. Interactome data and databases: different types of protein interaction. Comp. Funct. Genomics. 2004;5(2):173–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safari-Alighiarloo N, Taghizadeh M, Rezaei-Tavirani M, et al. Protein-protein interaction networks (PPI) and complex diseases. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2014;7(1):17–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevimoglu T, Arga KY. The role of protein interaction networks in systems biomedicine. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2014;11(18):22–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker MA. Proteomics of post-translational modifications of mammalian spermatozoa. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363(1):279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall GA, Role of posttranslational protein modifications in epididymal sperm maturation and extracellular quality control. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014;759:159–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Mann M. Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics MCP. 2013;12(12):3444–3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorelli J, Diaz ES, Morales P. Kinases phosphatases and proteases during sperm capacitation. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(3):765–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Rawi S, Louvet-Vallée S, Djeddi A, et al. Postfertilization autophagy of sperm organelles prevents paternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. Science. 2011;334(6059):1144–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D377–D386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(8):1091–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles MS, Cox J, Mann M. In-vivo quantitative proteomics reveals a key contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms to the circadian regulation of liver metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft D, Mundo AF, Haw R, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D472–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell A, Chang H-Y, Daugherty L, et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D213–D221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B, et al. The MIntAct project–IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D358–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark C, Breitkreutz B-J, Reguly T, et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D535–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshava Prasad TS, Goel R, Kandasamy K, et al. Human protein reference database–2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D767–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D447–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Forne I, Imhof A. Bioinformatic analysis of proteomics data. BMC Syst. Biol. 2014;8(Suppl 2):S3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 2005;21(16):3448–3449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D204–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miescher F. Das Protamin—Eine neue organische Basis aus denSamenf—den des Rheinlachses. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1874;7(1):376.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Wu Y, Jin K, et. al. Differential proteomic profiling in human spermatozoa that did or did not result in pregnancy via IVF and AID. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2013;7(11–12):850–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker MA. The omics revolution and our understanding of sperm cell biology. Asian. J Androl. 2011;13(1):6–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva R, De Mateo S, Estanyol JM. Sperm cell proteomics. Proteomics. 2009;9(4):1004–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijiri TW, Merdiushev T, Cao W, et al. Identification and validation of mouse sperm proteins correlated with epididymal maturation. Proteomics. 2011;11(20):4047–4062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secciani F, Bianchi L, Ermini L, et al., et. al.. Protein profile of capacitated versus ejaculated human sperm. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(7):3377–3389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Hu H, Wang Z, et. al.. Proteomic characteristics of spermatozoa in normozoospermic patients with infertility. J Proteomics. 2012;75(17):5426–5436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti JL, Castella S, Dacheux F, et. al.. Post-testicular sperm environment and fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82–83:321–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral A, Castillo J, Ramalho-Santos J, et al. The combined human sperm proteome: cellular pathways and implications for basic and clinical science. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(1):40–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Heredia J, Estanyol JM, Ballesca JL, et al. Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. Proteomics. 2006;6(15):4356–4369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mateo S, Martínez-Heredia J, Estanyol JM, et. al.. Marked correlations in protein expression identified by proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa. Proteomics. 2007;7(23):4264–4277. Erratum in: Proteomics.8:4833 (2008). Domíguez-Fandos, David [corrected to Domínguez-Fandos, David].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu F, Wang H, et al. Systematic mapping and functional analysis of a family of human epididymal secretory sperm located proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9(11):2517–2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu F, Liu X, et al. Mapping of the human testicular proteome and its relationship with that of the epididymis and spermatozoa. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(3):M110.004630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naaby-Hansen S, Herr JC. Heat shock proteins on the human sperm surface. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;84(1):32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedenho AP, Lima SB, Cenedeze MA, et al. Oligozoospermia and heat-shock protein expression in ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(7):1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergur AR, Dokras A, Giraldo JL, et al. Sperm maturity and treatment choice of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: diminished sperm HspA2 chaperone levels predict IVF failure. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):910–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszar G, Stone K, Dix D, et al. Putative creatine kinase M-isoform in human sperm is identified as the 70-kilodalton heat shock protein HspA2. Biol Reprod. 2000;63(3):925–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, et al. Proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa proteins with oxidative stress. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:48. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-11-48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker MA, Hetherington L, Aitken RJ. Identification of SRC as a key PKA-stimulated tyrosine kinase involved in the capacitation-associated hyperactivation of murine spermatozoa. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(pt 15):3182–3192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asquith KL. Tyrosine phosphorylation activates surface chaperones facilitating sperm-zona recognition. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:3645–3657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Guo Y, Zhou T, et al., et. al.. In-depth proteomic analysis of the human sperm reveals complex protein compositions. J Proteomics. 2013;79:114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfsberg TG, White JM. ADAMs in fertilization and development. Dev Biol. 1996;180(2):389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Heredia J, De Mateo S, Vidal-Taboada JM, et al. Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, Huo R, Wang F-Q, et al. Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):436–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral A, Ramalho-Santos J, St John JC. The expression of polymerase gamma and mitochondrial transcription factor A and the regulation of mitochondrial DNA content in mature human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1585–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao -T-T, Xiang Z, Zhu W-B, et al. Proteome analysis of roundheaded and normal spermatozoa by 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(6):683–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrouzi B, Kenigsberg S, Alladin N, et al. Evaluation of potential protein biomarkers in patients with high sperm DNA damage. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013;59(3):153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, et al. Major protein alterations in spermatozoa from infertile men with unilateral varicocele. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:8. doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Sharma R, Durairajanayagam D, et al. Spermatozoa protein alterations in infertile men with bilateral varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(1):43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada A1, Sharma R, Du Plessis SS, et al. Two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis-based proteomics of male gametes in relation to oxidative stress. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1216–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayaz A, Agarwal A, Sharma R, et al. Impact of precise modulation of reactive oxygen species levels on spermatozoa proteins in infertile men. Clin Proteomics. 2015;12(1):4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Yebra L, Ballescá JL, Vanrell JA, et al. Detection of P2 precursors in the sperm cells of infertile patients who have reduced protamine P2 levels. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(4):755–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou L, Zhang Q, Diao R, et al. A functional variant in the UBE2B gene promoter is associated with idiopathic azoospermia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:79. doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0074-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang I, Emery BR, Christensen GL, et al. Novel UBE2B-associated polymorphisms in an azoospermic/oligozoospermic population. Asian J Androl. 2008;10(3):461–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paduch DA, Mielnik A, Schlegel PN. Novel mutations in testis-specific ubiquitin protease 26 gene may cause male infertility and hypogonadism. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(6):747–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Skaletsky H, Birren B, et al. An azoospermic man with a de novo point mutation in the Y-chromosomal gene USP9Y. Nat Genet. 1999;23(4):429–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman SE, Bar-Shira Maymon B, Hauser R, et al. Histone H4 acetylation and AZFc involvement in germ cells of specimens of impaired spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(6):1728–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Sharma R, et al. Mechanisms of oligozoospermia: an oxidative stress perspective. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;60(4):206–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatsenko AN, Georgiadis AP, Murthy LJ, et al. Matzuk MM. UBE2B mRNA alterations are associated with severe oligozoospermia in infertile men. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19(6):388–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y-C, Wei L, Cui Y-X, et al. Association between ubiquitin-specific protease USP26 polymorphism and male infertility in Chinese men. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(7–8):545–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan -C-C, Shui H-A, Wu C-H, et al. Motility and protein phosphorylation in healthy and asthenozoospermic sperm. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(11):5382–5386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parte PP, Rao P, Redij S, et al.. Sperm phosphoproteome profiling by ultra performance liquid chromatography followed by data independent analysis (LC-MS(E)) reveals altered proteomic signatures in asthenozoospermia. J Proteomics. 2012;75(18):5861–5871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunes R, Doncel GF, Acosta AA. Incidence of sperm-tail tyrosine phosphorylation and hyperactivated motility in normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic human sperm samples. Biocell. 2003;27(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffone MG, Calamera JC, Verstraeten SV, et al. Capacitation-associated protein tyrosine phosphorylation and membrane fluidity changes are impaired in the spermatozoa of asthenozoospermic patients. Reproduction. 2005;129(6):697–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva AB, Kameshwari DB, Singh V, et al.. Proteomics-based study on asthenozoospermia: differential expression of proteasome alpha complex. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(7):452–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwat S, Dalvi V, Chandrasekhar D, et al. Acetylated α-tubulin is reduced in individuals with poor sperm motility. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(1):95–104.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawe VY, Olmedo SB, Benmusa A, et al. Sperm ubiquitination in patients with dysplasia of the fibrous sheath. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2119–2127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WL, Hunter AG, Jeyendran RS, et al. Association of asthenozoospermia with a deficiency of a seminal glycoprotein. Int J Fertil. 1985;30(2):57–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kratz EM, Kałuża A, Zimmer M, et al. The analysis of sialylation, N-glycan branching, and expression of O-glycans in seminal plasma of infertile men. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:941871. doi:10.1155/2015/941871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepideh J, Reza SM, Mahdi AM, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation pattern in sperm proteins isolated from normospermic and teratospermic men. J Reprod Infertil. 2009;10(3):185–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva JV, Freitas MJ, Correia BR, et al. Profiling signaling proteins in human spermatozoa: biomarker identification for sperm quality evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):845–856.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutovsky P. Sperm proteasome and fertilization. Reproduction. 2011;142:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffone MG, Brugo-Olmedo S, Calamera JC, et al. Decreased protein tyrosine phosphorylation and membrane fluidity in spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006;73(12):1591–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales JJ, Burgo RM, Galindo P, et al. Abnormal expression of acid glycosidases in seminal plasma and spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Reproduction. 2002;123(3):411–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour E, Shahverdi A, Parivar K, et al. Sperm ubiquitination and DNA fragmentation in men with occupational exposure and varicocele. Andrologia. 2014;46(4):423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, et al. The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(4):243–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez V, Wistuba J, Mallidis C. Semen analysis: update on clinical value, current needs and future perspectives. Reproduction. 2013;146(6):R249-258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Halabi J, et al. Proteomics, oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):32–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon B, Bromfield EG, Dun MD, et al. The role of the molecular chaperone heat shock protein A2 (HSPA2) in regulating human sperm-egg recognition. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:568–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromfield EG, Aitken RJ, Anderson AL, et al. The impact of oxidative stress on chaperone-mediated human sperm-egg interaction. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2597–2613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q, Schoenhoff FS, Savage WJ, et al. Multiplex assays for biomarker research and clinical application: translational science coming of age. PROTEOMICS Clin. Appl. 2010;4(3):271–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai K, Koshiyama A, Nakata K. Towards clinical proteomics analysis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2011;25(1–2):59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margreitter C, Petrov D, Zagrovic B. Vienna-PTM web server: a toolkit for MD simulations of protein post-translational modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W422–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell AW, Deutsch EW, Au CE, et al.. HUPO Test Sample Working Group. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature Methods. 2009;6(6):423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper TG, Yeung CH. Recent biochemical approaches to post-testicular, epididymal contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(2):141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khole V. Epididymis as a target for contraception. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003;41(7):764–772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar