Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty

References

• Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 41, 778–799 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo MH, Muller MS. What’s new in hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86A, 2341–2353 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo MH, Brown BS. What’s new in hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85A, 1852–1864 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnes O, Havelin LI, Espehaug B et al. The Norwegian registry of joint prostheses-15 beneficial years for both the patients and the healthcare. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 123, 1367–1369 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin. Orthop. 311, 46–53 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibeck MJ, Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Glant TT. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr. Course Lect. 50, 185–195 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.311, 3–20 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 81, 115–136 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M et al. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin. Orthop. 274, 60–78 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris WH, Muratoglu OK. A review of current cross-linked polyethylenes used in total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 430, 46–52 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop HA. Bearing surfaces in total hip replacements: state of the art and future developments. Instr. Course Lect. 50, 165–179 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sochart DH. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 363, 135–150 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. Recipient of the 1999 HAP Paul Award. J. Arthroplasty 16, 149–160 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor GA, Villar RN, Coleman N. Tissue reaction and loosening of carbon-reinforced polyethylene arthroplasties. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 74, 156–157 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pienkowski D, Patel A, Lee KY et al. Solubility changes in shelf-aged ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular liners. J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 9, 273–288 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Shen FW, DiMaio W, Lancaster JG. Wear of γ-crosslinked polyethylene acetabular cups against roughened femoral balls. Clin. Orthop. 369, 73–82 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Dorr LD, Maloney WJ, Berry D. The bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty: evolution or revolution. Instr. Course Lect. 49, 41–56 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKellop HA, Shen FW, Campbell P, Ota T. Effect of molecular weight, calcium stearate, and sterilization methods on the wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups in a hip joint simulator. J. Orthop. Res. 17, 329–339 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonishi H, Clarke IC, Yamamoto K et al. Assessment of wear in extensively irradiated UHMWPE cups in simulator studies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 68, 52–60 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Grobbelaar CJ, Weber FA, Spirakis A et al. Clinical experience with γ-irradiation crosslinked polyethylene. A 14 to 20 year follow-up report. SA Bone Joint Surg. 9, 140–147 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Grobbelaar CJ, du Plessis TA, Marais F. The radiation improvement of polyethylene prostheses. A preliminary study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 60B, 370–374 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO et al. Unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE). Biomaterials 20, 1463–1470 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonishi H, Takayama Y, Tsuji E. Improvement of polyethylene by irradiation in artificial joints. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 39, 495–504 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomoll A, Wanich T, Bellare A. J-integral fracture toughness and tearing modulus measurement of radiation cross-linked UHMWPE. J. Orthop. Res. 20, 1152–1156 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP. Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. Instr. Course Lect. 53, 49–65 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen FW, McKellop H. Surface-gradient cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cups: oxidation resistance and wear against smooth and rough femoral balls. Clin. Orthop.430, 80–88 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Delaney J, O’Connor DO, Harris WH. The use of trans-vinylene formation in quantifying the spatial distribution of electron beam penetration in polyethylene. Single-sided, double-sided and shielded irradiation. Biomaterials 24, 2021–2029 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell CW, Hermida JH, Bergula A, Chen PC, D’Lima DD. Effect of head size and crosslinking on wear in polytheylene acetabular components. Trans AAHKS. 11, 46 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72, 518–528 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs BR, Golladay GJ, Hallstrom B, Harris WH. A novel constrained acetabular liner design with increased range of motion. J. Arthroplasty 16, 31–36 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs BR, Rubash HE, Harris WH. Femoral head sizes larger than 32 mm against highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. 405, 150–157 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J. Orthop. Res. 17, 157–167 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Gobel D et al. Wear behavior and histopathology of classic cemented metal-on-metal hip endoprostheses. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S160–S186 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Grigoris P. Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S11–S34 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Bentley G, Duthie RB. A comparative review of the McKee-Farrar and Charnley total hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. 95, 127–142 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Charnley J, Cupic Z. The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. 95, 9–25 (1973).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Peters PC, Maurer BT, Bragdon CR, Harris WH. Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J. Arthroplasty 11, 322–331 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP. Metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. 430, 53–61 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma SM, Kabo JM, Amstutz HC. Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 65, 366–370 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz RG, Wilson RJ. Factors affecting the mechanical stability of the cemented acetabular component in total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 59, 501–504 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Weber H, Schon R. Cobalt chromium molybdenum metal combination for modular hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S35–S47 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa R et al. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S128–S140 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Santavirta S, Bohler M, Harris WH et al. Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthop. Scand. 74, 380–388 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Wahlstrom O. Twenty-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S60–S68 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Wahlstrom O. A comparative study between McKee-Farrar and Charnley arthroplasty with long-term follow-up periods. J. Arthroplasty 5, 9–14 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner M, Wagner H. Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. 379, 123–133 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Wagner H. Preliminary results of uncemented metal on metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S78–S88 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Weber BG. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S69–S77 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Streicher RM, Semlitsch M, Schon R, Weber H, Rieker C. Metal-on-metal articulation for artificial hip joints: laboratory study and clinical results. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (H) 210, 223–232 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB et al. Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. Clin. Orthop. 333, 96–107 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Medley JB, Chan FW, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Comparison of alloys and designs in a hip simulator study of metal on metal implants. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S148–S159 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin. Orthop. 369, 10–24 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z, Longjohn DB, Dubois B, Murken R. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four to seven-year results. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 82, 789–798 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naudie D, Roeder CP, Parvizi J et al. Metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study. J. Arthroplasty 19, 35–41 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doorn PF, Campbell PA, Worrall J et al. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacements: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 42, 103–111 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes DR, Boyle SJ, Rogers SD, Howie DW, Vernon-Roberts B. Variation in cytokines induced by particles from different prosthetic materials. Clin. Orthop. 352, 223–230 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie DW, Rogers SD, McGee MA, Haynes DR. Biologic effects of cobalt chrome in cell and animal models. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S217–S232 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ et al. Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J. Orthop. Res. 15, 40–49 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Human monocyte response to particulate biomaterials generated in vivo and in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 13, 792–801 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green TR, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials 19, 2297–2302 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willert HG, Semlitsch M. Tissue reactions to plastic and metallic wear products of joint endoprostheses. Clin. Orthop.333, 4–14 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 28–36 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipor AK, Campbell PA, Patterson LM et al. Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 13, 1227–1234 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM et al. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 80, 1447–1458 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Gilbert JL et al. Local and distant products from modularity. Clin. Orthop. 319, 94–105 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V et al. Elevated serum cobalt with metal-on-metal articulating surfaces. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79, 316–321 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heisel C, Silva M, Skipor AK, Jacobs JJ, Schmalzried TP. The relationship between activity and ions in patients with metal-on-metal bearing hip prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 781–787 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Doorn PF et al. Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal on metal total hip replacements. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S256–S263 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman MA, Swanson SA, Heath JC. Study of the wear particles produced from cobalt-chromium-molybdenum-manganese total joint replacement prostheses. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(Suppl.), 29 (1969).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath JC, Freeman MA, Swanson SA. Carcinogenic properties of wear particles from prostheses made in cobalt-chromium alloy. Lancet 1, 564–566 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visuri T, Koskenvuo M. Cancer risk after Mckee-Farrar total hip replacement. Orthopedics 14, 137–142 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visuri T, Pukkala E, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Riska EB. Cancer risk after metal on metal and polyethylene on metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 329(Suppl.), S280–S289 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hannouche D, Hamadouche M, Nizard R et al. Ceramics in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. 430, 62–71 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin P. Total arthroplasty of the hip by fritted aluminum prosthesis. Experimental study and 1st clinical applications. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 58, 229–246 (1972).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mittelmeier H, Heisel J. Sixteen-years experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. 282, 64–72 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedel L, Nizard RS, Kerboull L, Witvoet J. Alumina-alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin. Orthop. 298, 175–183 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walter A. On the material and the tribology of alumina-alumina couplings for hip joint prostheses. Clin. Orthop. 282, 31–46 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney OM, Dimon JH III. Unsatisfactory results with a ceramic total hip prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72, 663–671 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM et al. The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22, 1203–1232 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhommeaux F, Hamadouche M, Nevelos J et al. Wear of alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties at a mean 11-year follow-up. Clin. Orthop. 379, 113–122 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Heimke G, Griss P. Five years experience with ceramic-metal-composite hip endoprostheses. II. Mechanical evaluations and improvements. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 98, 165–171 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann G. Ceramics for total hip replacement-what a surgeon should know. Orthopedics 21, 173–177 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann G, Kramer U. Ceramic cups for hip endoprostheses. 5: consideration of designs. Biomed. Tech. (Berl). 43, 342–349 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohler M, Mochida Y, Bauer TW, Plenk H Jr, Salzer M. Wear debris from two different alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 82, 901–909 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke IC, Good V, Williams P et al. Ultra-low wear rates for rigid-on-rigid bearings in total hip replacements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (H). 214, 331–347 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch EW, Gleitz M. Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 328, 129–136 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piconi C, Labanti M, Magnani G et al. Analysis of a failed alumina THR ball head. Biomaterials 20, 1637–1646 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, Bierbaum B. New experience with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 17, 390–397 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cales B. Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data. Clin. Orthop.379, 94–112 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Drouin JM, Cales B, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G. Fatigue behavior of zirconia hip joint heads: experimental results and finite element analysis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 34, 149–155 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23, 45–61 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann G, Fruh HJ, Pfaff HG. Wear characteristics of sliding pairs of zirconia (Y-TZP) for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials 17, 2157–2162 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain J, Le Mouel S, Goutallier D, Voisin MC. Poor eight-year survival of cemented zirconia-polyethylene total hip replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81, 835–842 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton MR, Yarlagadda R, Anderson GH. Catastrophic failure of the Elite Plus total hip replacement, with a Hylamer acetabulum and Zirconia ceramic femoral head. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 84, 631–635 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 20, 1–25 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer CD III, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Catastrophic failure of modular zirconia-ceramic femoral head components after total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 10, 848–850 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier J, Drouin JM, Cales B. Low temperature ageing behaviour of zirconia hip joint heads. In: Bioceramics 10. Sedel L, Rey C (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 135–137 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Affatato S, Testoni M, Cacciari GL, Toni A. Mixed oxides prosthetic ceramic ball heads. Part 1: effect of the ZrO2 fraction on the wear of ceramic on polythylene joints. Biomaterials 20, 971–975 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affatato S, Testoni M, Cacciari GL, Toni A. Mixed-oxides prosthetic ceramic ball heads. Part 2: effect of the ZrO2 fraction on the wear of ceramic on ceramic joints. Biomaterials 20, 1925–1929 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar