Stimuli-responsive polymers in gene delivery

References

• Crystal RG. Transfer of genes to humans: early lessons and obstacles to success. Science 270, 404–410 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma M, Somia N. Gene therapy – promises, problems and prospects. Nature 389, 239–242 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SH, Smith AE. Gene therapy progress and prospects: gene therapy of lysosomal storage disorders. Gene Ther. 10, 1275–1281 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon GJ. RNA interference. Nature 418, 244–251 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirolloa KF, Raita A, Sleerb LS, Chang EH. Antisense therapeutics: from theory to clinical practice. Pharmacol. Ther. 99, 55–77 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi F, Hoekstra D. Effective intracellular delivery of oligonucleotides in order to make sense of antisense. J. Control. Release 97, 189–209 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells JM, Li LH, Sen A et al. Electroporation – enhanced gene delivery in mammary tumors. Gene Ther. 7, 541–547 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwer K, Kao G, Proctor B et al. Ultrasound enhancement of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to primary tumors following systemic administration. Gene Ther. 7, 1833–1839 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Huang L. Nonviral vectors in the new millennium: delivery barriers in gene transfer. Hum. Gene Ther. 12, 861–870 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndoye A, Merlin JL, Leroux A et al. Enhanced gene transfer and cell death following p53 gene transfer using photochemical internalisation of glucosylated PEI-DNA complexes. J. Gene Med. 6, 884–894 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu GY, Wu CH. Receptor-mediated in vitro gene transformation by a soluble DNA carrier system. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4429–4432 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircheis R, Kichler A, Wallner G et al. Coupling of cell-binding ligands to polyethylenimine for targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther. 4, 409–418 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogris M, Brunner S, Schuller S et al. Pegylated DNA/transferrin-PEI complexes: reduced interaction with blood components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene delivery. Gene Ther. 6, 595–605 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbacher P, Bettinger T, Belguise-Valladier P. Transfection and physical properties of various saccharide, poly(ethylene glycol), and antibody-derivatized polyethylenimines (PEI). J. Gene Med. 1, 210–222 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 247, 1465–1468 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Vargo D, Budker V et al. Expression of naked plasmid DNA injected into the afferent and efferent vessels of rodent and dog livers. Hum. Gene Ther. 8, 1763–1772 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. George JA. Gene therapy progress and prospects: adenoviral vectors. Gene Ther. 10, 1135–1141 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kootstra NA, Verma IN. Gene therapy with viral vectors. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 43, 413–439 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CE, Ehrhardt A, Kay MA. Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 346–358 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabel GJ, Nabel EG, Yang ZY et al. Direct gene transfer with DNA-liposome complexes in melanoma: expression biologic activity and lack of toxicity in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11307–11311 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felgner PL, Gadek TR, Holm M et al. Lipofection – a highly efficient, lipidmediated DNA-transfection procedure Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7413–7417 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhood H, Serbina N, Huang L. The role of dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine in cationic liposome mediated gene transfer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1235, 289–295 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Huang L. Cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther. 2, 710–722 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook K, McLachlan G, Stevenson BJ, Porteous DL. Plasmid DNA molecules complexed with cationic liposomes are protected from degradation by nucleases and shearing by aerosolisation. Gene Ther. 3, 834–839 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porteous DJ, Dorin JR, McLachlan G et al. Evidence for safety and efficacy of DOTAP cationic liposome mediated CFTR gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 4, 210–218 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Li S, Tan YD, Stolz DB et al. Lyophilization of cationic lipidprotamine-DNA (LPD) complexes. J. Pharm. Sci. 89, 355–364 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serikawa T, Suzuki N, Kikuchi H et al. A new cationic liposome for efficient gene delivery with serum into cultured human cells: a quantitative analysis using two independent fluorescent probes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1467, 419–430 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou YY, Zong G, Ling YH, Perez-Soler R. Development of cationic liposome formulations for intratracheal gene therapy of early lung cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 7, 683–696 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lima MCP, Neves S, Filipe A et al. Cationic liposomes for gene delivery: from biophysics to biological applications. Curr. Med. Chem.10, 1221–1231 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt SC, Demeester J, Hennink WE. Cationic polymer based gene delivery systems. Pharma. Res. 17, 113–126 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Brown MD, Schatzlein AG, Uchegbu IF. Gene delivery with synthetic (non-viral) carriers. Int. J. Pharm. 229, 1–21 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niidome T, Huang L. Gene therapy progress and prospects: non-viral vectors. Gene Ther. 9, 1647–1652 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdan M, Kopecek J, Kissel T. Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.54, 715–758 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YW, Kim JD, Kinam Park K. Polycation gene delivery systems: escape from endosomes to cytosol. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 55, 721–734 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong JH, Song SH, Lim DW et al. DNA transfection using linear poly(ethylenimine) prepared by controlled acid hydrolysis of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline). J. Control. Release 73, 391–399 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Zange R, Kissel T. Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity studies of polycation for gene therapy. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 24, 527–528 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Bieber T, Elasser HP, Kissel T. Polyethylenimine synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity of a low molecular weight polycation for gene transfer. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 75, 108–116 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Bieber T, Elasser HP, Kissel T. A novel non-viral vector for DNA delivery based on low molecular weight, branched polyethleneimine: effect of molecular weight on transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity. Pharm. Res. 16, 1273–1279 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choksakulnimitr S, Masuda S, Takuda H et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of macromolecules in different cell culture systems. J. Control. Release 34, 233–241 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson SCW, Kolbe HVJ, Duncan R. Potential of low molecular mass chitosan as a DNA delivery system: biocompatibility, body distribution and ability to complex and protect DNA. Int. J. Pharm. 178, 231–243 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Bellocq N, Davis ME. Effects of structure of β-cyclodextrin-containing polymers on gene delivery. Bioconjug Chem.12, 280–290 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SO, Mahato RI, Sung YK, Kim SW. Development of biomaterials for gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 2, 302–317 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen H, Levy RJ, Gao J et al. Sustained delivery and expression of DNA encapsulated in polymeric nanoparticles. Gene Ther. 7, 1896–1905 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank C, Mechtler K, Szoka F, Wagner E. Activation of the complement system by synthetic DNA complexes: a potential barrier for intravenous gene delivery. Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 1437–1446 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Robinson DR, Kwan GS, Samuel J. Encapsulation of plasmid DNA in biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres as a novel approach for immunogene delivery. J. Control. Release 57, 9–18 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvie P, Wong FMP, Bally MB. Use of poly(ethylene glycol)-lipid conjugates to regulate the surface attributes and transfection activity of lipid-DNA particles. J. Pharm. Sci. 89, 652–663 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaev IY, Mattiasson B. Smart polymers and what they could do in biotechnology and medicine. Trends Biotech. 17, 335–340 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost J, Langer R. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.46, 125–148 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong B, Gutowska A. Lessons from nature: stimuli-responsive polymers and their biomedical applications. Trends Biotech. 27, 305–311 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Shimoboji T, Larenas E, Fowler T, Kulkarni S, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS. Photoresponsive polymer-enzyme switches. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16592–16596 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama M. Gene delivery using temperature-responsive polymeric carriers. Drug Discov. Today 7, 426–432 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinrichs WLJ, Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek NME, De Wetering PV, Hennink WE. Thermosensitive polymers as carriers for DNA delivery. J. Control. Release 60, 249–259 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurisawa M, Yokoyama M, Okano T. Gene expression control by temperature with thermo-responsive polymeric gene carriers. J. Control. Release 68, 1–8 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurisawa M, Yokoyama M, Okano T. Transfection efficiency increases by incorporating hydrophobic monomer units into polymeric gene carriers. J. Control. Release 69, 127–137 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasaki T, Atarashi K, Makino K et al. Synthesis of a novel water-soluble polyazobenzene dendimer and photoregulation of affinity towards DNA. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 345, 227–232 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Twaites BR, Alarcon CH, Cunliffe D et al. Thermo and pH responsive polymers as gene delivery vectors: effect of polymer architecture on DNA complexation in vitro. J. Control. Release 97, 551–566 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer S, Tuncel A, şPiskin E. A potential gene delivery vector: N-Isopropylacrylamide-ethyleneimine block co-polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 203, 1460–1465 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareie MH, Dinçer S, şPiskin E. Observation of phase transition of thermo-responsive poly(NIPA)-PEI block co-polymers by STM, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 251, 424–428 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisşkin E. Molecularly designed water soluble, intelligent, nanosize polymeric carriers. Int. J. Pharm. 277, 105–118 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisşkin E, Dinçer S, Türk M. Gene delivery-intelligent but just at the beginning. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 15, 1181–1202 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk M, Dinçer S, Yuluğ IG, şPiskin E. In vitro tansfection of HeLa cells with stimuli-responsive and polycationic co-polymers. J. Control. Release 96, 325–340 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk M, Dinçer S, şPiskin E. In vitro transfection of smooth muscle cells with temperature sensitive smart polymers. Gene Ther. (2004) (In Press).
   Google Scholar