Robotics in invasive cardiac electrophysiology

References

• Harrison L, Gallagher JJ, Kasell J, et al. Cryosurgical ablation of AV node-his bundle - new method for producing AV block. Circulation 1977;55(3):463-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddis MN, Chen J, Osborn J, et al. Magnetic guidance system for cardiac electrophysiology - A prospective trial of safety and efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(11):1952-8
   Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Danon A, Lashevsky I, et al. Robotically assisted ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013;10(13):01669-0
   Google Scholar
• Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(15):1596-600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddis MN, Blume W, Finney J, et al. Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 2002;106(23):2980-5
   Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Danon A, Crystal A, et al. Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013;11(7):829-36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis DR, Tang ASL, Gollob MH, et al. Remote magnetic navigation-assisted catheter ablation enhances catheter stability and ablation success with lower catheter temperatures. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31(7):893-8
   Google Scholar
• Latcu DG, Ricard P, Zarqane N, et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009;102(5):419-25
   Google Scholar
• Ricard P, Latcu DG, Yaici K, et al. Slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with AVNRT: junctional rhythm is less frequent during magnetic navigation ablation than with the conventional technique. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33(1):11-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim E, Off MK, Hoff PI, et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2011;32(1):37-43
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinidou M, Wissner E, Chun JKR, et al. Luminal esophageal temperature rise and esophageal lesion formation following remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm 2011;8(12):1875-80
   Google Scholar
• Danon A NK, Shurrab M, Chen X, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic control and the risk of atrial-esophageal fistula. 2013
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Nault I, Haissaguerre M, Hocini M. Atrial fibrillation ablation by aortic retrograde approach using a magnetic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21(4):455-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung R, Shivkumar K, Mandapati R. Ablation of post transplant atrial flutter and pseudo-fibrillation using magnetic navigation via a superior approach. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2012;12(5):229-32
   Google Scholar
• Khan MK, Elmouchi D. Ablation of a resistant right atrial appendage tachycardia using a magnetic navigation system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013;36(1):E15-18
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinidou M, Koektuerk B, Wissner E, et al. Catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: a simplified remote-controlled approach. Europace 2011;13(5):696-700
   Google Scholar
• Neuzil P. STOP-VT: A Multi-center trial to evaluate catheter RF ablation with magnetic navigation for ischemic ventricular tachycardia. 2011
   Google Scholar
• Kovoor P, Ricciardello M, Collins L, et al. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1998;98(15):1534-40
   Google Scholar
• Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, et al. Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Circulation 2001;104(1):58-62
   Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Laish-Farkash A, Lashevsky I, et al. Three-dimensional localization versus fluoroscopically only guided ablations: a meta-analysis. Scand Cardiovasc J 2013;47(4):200-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Martin L, Angel L, Tomassoni G. Initial clinical experience with cardiac resynchronization therapy utilizing a magnetic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18(2):174-80
   Google Scholar
• Luthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J, et al. Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation. Europace 2010;12(11):1574-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolker G, Gutleben KJ, Muntean B, et al. Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation. Europace 2012;14(12):1715-18
   Google Scholar
• Chun KRJ, Wissner E, Koektuerk B, et al. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. CircArrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3(5):458-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Malchano ZJ, et al. View-synchronized robotic image-guided therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation - experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Circulation 2007;115(21):2705-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Biase L, Wang Y, Horton R, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: single-center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20(12):1328-35
   Google Scholar
• Rillig A, Meyerfeldt U, Birkemeyer R, et al. Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned? J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010;29(2):109-17
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt B, Tilz RR, Neven K, et al. Remote robotic navigation and electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation considerations for navigation and impact on procedural outcome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2(2):120-8
   Google Scholar
• Duncan ER, Finlay M, Page SP, et al. Improved electrogram attenuation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with the hansen robotic system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2012;35(6):730-8
   Google Scholar
• Duncan E, Johns N, Schilling RJ, Sporton S. Robotic catheter navigation within the left ventricle. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34(11):102-4
   Google Scholar
• Valderrabano M, Dave AS, Baez-Escudero JL, Rami T. Robotic catheter ablation of left ventricular tachycardia: initial experience. Heart Rhythm 2011;8(12):1837-46
   Google Scholar
• Steven D, Rostock T, Servatius H, et al. Robotic versus conventional ablation for common-type atrial flutter: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of remote catheter navigation. Heart Rhythm 2008;5(11):1556-60
   Google Scholar
• Rillig A, Schmidt B, Feige B, et al. Left atrial isthmus line ablation using a remote robotic navigation system: feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome. Clin Res Cardiol 2013;102(12):885-93
   Google Scholar
• Bai R, Di Biase L, Valderrabano M, et al. Worldwide Experience with the Robotic Navigation System in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: methodology, Efficacy and Safety. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23(8):820-6
   Google Scholar
• Saliba W, Reddy VY, Wazni O, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system - Initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(25):2407-11
   Google Scholar
• Rillig A, Schmidt B, Steven D, et al. Study Design of the man and machine trial: a prospective international controlled noninferiority trial comparing manual with robotic catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24(1):40-6
   Google Scholar
• Di Biase L, Natale A, Barrett C, et al. Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, “Popping,” and char formation: experience with robotic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20(4):436-40
   Google Scholar
• Wazni OM, Barrett C, Martin DO, et al. Experience with the hansen robotic system for atrial fibrillation ablation-lessons learned and techniques modified: hansen in the real world. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20(11):1193-6
   Google Scholar
• Tilz RR, Chun KRJ, Metzner A, et al. Unexpected high incidence of esophageal injury following pulmonary vein isolation using robotic navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21(8):853-8
   Google Scholar
• Chasan R, Soydan N, Burgazli MK, et al. RF ablation of WPW syndrome using ensite array balloon mapping and Hansen-Sensei robotic cool-path catheter. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011;11(6):567-7
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gil M, Salgado R, Merino JL, et al. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation using a novel remote navigation catheter system in patients with typical atrial flutter. Europace 2013;20:20
   Google Scholar
• Khan EM, Frumkin W, Ng GA, et al. First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: AMIGO (TM) mapping trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2013;37(2):121-9
   Google Scholar
• Gang ES, Nguyen BL, Shachar Y, et al. Dynamically shaped magnetic fields initial animal validation of a new remote electrophysiology catheter guidance and control system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4(5):770-U287
   Google Scholar
• Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, et al. Physician-controlled costs: the choice of equipment used for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2013;36(2):157-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(7):1390-400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuberger HR, Tilz RR, Bonnemeier H, et al. A survey of German centres performing invasive electrophysiology: structure, procedures, and training positions. Europace 2013;15(12):1741-6
   Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Fishman E, Kaoutskaia A, et al. Snapshot of invasive electrophysiology in Canada in 2012: results from the national survey. Can J Cardiol 2013;29(10):S187-8
   Google Scholar