Reflections on the present and future of upper limb prostheses

References

• Schlesinger G. Der Mechanische Aufbau der Künstlichen Glieder. In: Bochardt M, editor. Ersatzglieder und Arbeitshilfen. Berlin: Springer; 1919.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter R. Eine neue Elektrokunsthand. Grenzgeb Med. 1948;4:133.
   Google Scholar
• Amsuess S, Goebel P, Graimann B, et al. Extending mode switching to multiple degrees of freedom in hand prosthesis control is not efficient. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2014; Chicago, IL; p. 658–661. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943677
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie E, Ephraim P, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• e-NABLE [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Nov 23]. Available from: http://enablingthefuture.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Gibard J. Open hand project [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Nov 23]. Available from: www.openhandproject.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiken T, Miller L, Lipschutz R, et al. Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study. Lancet. 2007;369(9559):371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher J. Todd Kuiken: pioneer of prostheses. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(3):210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan D, Schiefer M, Keith M, et al. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257ra138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan M, Hakansson B, Branemark R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257re6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belter J, Segil J, Dollar A, et al. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(5):599–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl S, Christie BP, Kelly B, et al. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2015;12(1):53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, He B. Brain-computer interfaces using sensorimotor rhythms: current state and future perspectives. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(5):1425–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini P, Micera S, Benvenuto A, et al. Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(5):777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Rehbaum H, Holobar A, et al. Noninvasive, accurate assessment of the behavior of representative populations of motor units in targeted reinnervated muscles. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(4):810–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorcas D, Scott R. A three-state myoelectric control system. Med Biol Eng. 1966;4:367–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, et al. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang N, Dosen S, Müller K-R, et al. Myoelectric control of artificial limbs - is there a need to change focus?. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2012;29(5):152–150.
   Google Scholar
• COAPT Complete Control [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.coaptengineering.com/complete-control.html.
   Google Scholar
• Amsuess S, Vujaklija I, Göbel P, et al. Context-dependent upper limb prosthesis control for natural and robust use. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2454240. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Markovic M, Dosen S, Cipriani C, et al. Stereovision and augmented reality for closed-loop control of grasping in hand prostheses. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(4):046001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninu A, Dosen S, Muceli S, et al. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(5):1041–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Aszmann O. Bionic limbs: clinical reality and academic promises. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257ps12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasco P, Kim K, Colgate J, et al. Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 3):747–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich C, Walter-Walsh K, Preißler S, et al. Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: proof of a principle. Neurosci Lett. 2012;507(2):97–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini F, et al. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(222):222ra19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antfolk C, D’Alonzo M, Rosén B, et al. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(1):45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alonzo M, Dosen S, Cipriani C, et al.. HyVE – hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation – is an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014;7(2):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostlie K, Lesjo I, Franklin R, et al. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(4):294–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aszmann O, Roche A, Salminger S, et al. Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2183–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar