Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: current status and future prospects

References

• Shah K. Current advances in molecular imaging of gene and cell therapy for cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther.4(5), 518–523 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinlib L, Field L. Cell transplantation as future therapy for cardiovascular disease? A workshop of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation101(18), E182–E187 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazelton TR, Blau HM. Optimizing techniques for tracking transplanted stem cells in vivo. Stem Cells23(9), 1251–1265 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blits B, Kitay BM, Farahvar A et al. Lentiviral vector-mediated transduction of neural progenitor cells before implantation into injured spinal cord and brain to detect their migration, deliver neurotrophic factors and repair tissue. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci.23(5–6), 313–324 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Swijnenburg RJ, Gunawan F et al.In vivo visualization of cardiac allograft rejection and trafficking passenger leukocytes using bioluminescence imaging. Circulation112(9 Suppl.), I105–I110 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmurugan R, Gambhir SS. Firefly luciferase enzyme fragment complementation for imaging in cells and living animals. Anal. Chem.77(5), 1295–1302 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dingli D, Kemp BJ, O’Connor MK et al. Combined I-124 positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of NIS gene expression in animal models of stably transfected and intravenously transfected tumor. Mol. Imaging Biol.8(1), 16–23 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Lee DS, Kang JH et al. Reversing the silencing of reporter sodium/iodide symporter transgene for stem cell tracking. J. Nucl. Med.46(2), 305–311 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JK. Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J. Nucl. Med.43(9), 1188–1200 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghoubi SS, Barrio JR, Namavari M et al. Imaging progress of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase suicide gene therapy in living subjects with positron emission tomography. Cancer Gene Ther.12(3), 329–339 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buursma AR, Rutgers V, Hospers GA et al. 18F-FEAU as a radiotracer for herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene expression: in vitro comparison with other PET tracers. Nucl. Med. Commun.27(1), 25–30 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustinx R, Shiue CY, Alavi A et al. Imaging in vivo herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene transfer to tumour-bearing rodents using positron emission tomography and. Eur. J. Nucl. Med.28(1), 5–12 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao F, Lin S, Xie X et al.In vivo visualization of embryonic stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration after cardiac delivery. Circulation113(7), 1005–1014 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruchez MP. Turning all the lights on: quantum dots in cellular assays. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.9(5), 533–537 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerman ME, Chan WC, Laakkonen P, Bhatia SN, Ruoslahti E. Nanocrystal targeting in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99(20), 12617–12621 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA et al. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science307(5709), 538–544 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JA, Zywicke H, Jordan EK et al. Magnetic intracellular labeling of mammalian cells by combining (FDA-approved) superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agents and commonly used transfection agents. Acad. Radiol.9(Suppl. 2), S484–S487 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JA, Miller BR, Arbab AS et al. Clinically applicable labeling of mammalian and stem cells by combining superparamagnetic iron oxides and transfection agents. Radiology228(2), 480–487 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Kalish H et al. Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI. Blood104(4), 1217–1223 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Bashaw LA, Miller BR et al. Intracytoplasmic tagging of cells with ferumoxides and transfection agent for cellular magnetic resonance imaging after cell transplantation: methods and techniques. Transplantation76(7), 1123–1130 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant LH Jr, Brechbiel MW, Wu C et al. Synthesis and relaxometry of high-generation (G = 5, 7, 9, and 10) PAMAM dendrimer-DOTA-gadolinium chelates. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging9(2), 348–352 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Wilson LB et al. Comparison of transfection agents in forming complexes with ferumoxides, cell labeling efficiency, and cellular viability. Mol. Imaging3(1), 24–32 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kircher MF, Allport JR, Graves EE et al.In vivo high resolution three-dimensional imaging of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte trafficking to tumors. Cancer Res.63(20), 6838–6846 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore A, Grimm J, Han B, Santamaria P. Tracking the recruitment of diabetogenic CD8+ T-cells to the pancreas in real time. Diabetes53(6), 1459–1466 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson L, Tung CH, Moore A, Weissleder R. High-efficiency intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-Tat peptide conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem.10(2), 186–191 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczak P, Kedziorek DA, Gilad AA, Lin S, Bulte JW. Instant MR labeling of stem cells using magnetoelectroporation. Magn. Reson. Med.54(4), 769–774 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoda K, Tooyama I, Kato M et al. Effective magnetic labeling of transplanted cells with HVJ-E for magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport15(4), 589–593 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bos EJ, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H et al. Improved efficacy of stem cell labeling for magnetic resonance imaging studies by the use of cationic liposomes. Cell Transplant.12(7), 743–756 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP. Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn. Reson. Med.53(2), 329–338 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Dai H, Merritt ME et al. A new class of macrocyclic lanthanide complexes for cell labeling and magnetic resonance imaging applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127(46), 16178–16188 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vuu K, Xie J, McDonald MA et al. Gadolinium–rhodamine nanoparticles for cell labeling and tracking via magnetic resonance and optical imaging. Bioconjug. Chem.16(4), 995–999 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson SA, Lee KK, Frank JA. Gadolinium-fullerenol as a paramagnetic contrast agent for cellular imaging. Invest. Radiol.41(3), 332–338 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudelius M, Daldrup-Link HE, Heinzmann U et al. Highly efficient paramagnetic labelling of embryonic and neuronal stem cells. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging30(7), 1038–1044 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aime S, Barge A, Cabella C, Crich SG, Gianolio E. Targeting cells with MR imaging probes based on paramagnetic Gd(III) chelates. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol.5(6), 509–518 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki I, Takahashi Y, Chuang KH et al. Cell labeling for magnetic resonance imaging with the T(1) agent manganese chloride. NMR Biomed.19(1), 50–59 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Ghosh RN, Maxfield FR. Endocytosis. Physiol. Rev.77(3), 759–803 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Kauwe LK, Xie J, Hamm-Alvarez S. Intracellular trafficking of nonviral vectors. Gene Ther.12(24), 1734–1751 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner SD, Schmid SL. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature422(6927), 37–44 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky FM, Chen CY, Knuehl C, Towler MC, Wakeham DE. Biological basket weaving: formation and function of clathrin-coated vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.17, 517–568 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid SL. Clathrin-coated vesicle formation and protein sorting: an integrated process. Annu. Rev. Biochem.66, 511–548 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crich SG, Lanzardo S, Barge A et al. Visualization through magnetic resonance imaging of DNA internalized following ‘in vivo’ electroporation. Mol. Imaging4(1), 7–17 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakase I, Niwa M, Takeuchi T et al. Cellular uptake of arginine-rich peptides: roles for macropinocytosis and actin rearrangement. Mol. Ther.10(6), 1011–1022 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan IM, Wadia JS, Dowdy SF. Cationic TAT peptide transduction domain enters cells by macropinocytosis. J. Control. Release102(1), 247–253 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZG, Jiang Q, Zhang R et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurosphere therapy of stroke in rat. Ann. Neurol.53(2), 259–263 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson JM, Krieg T, Eming SA. Particle-mediated gene therapy of wounds. Wound Repair Regen.8(6), 452–459 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs RE, Fraser SE. Magnetic resonance microscopy of embryonic cell lineages and movements. Science263(5147), 681–684 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terreno E, Geninatti Crich S, Belfiore S et al. Effect of the intracellular localization of a Gd-based imaging probe on the relaxation enhancement of water protons. Magn. Reson. Med.55(3), 491–497 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crich SG, Biancone L, Cantaluppi V et al. Improved route for the visualization of stem cells labeled with a Gd-/Eu-chelate as dual (MRI and fluorescence) agent. Magn. Reson. Med.51(5), 938–944 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf GL, Burnett KR, Goldstein EJ, Joseph PM. Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Annu.231–266 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendonca-Dias MH, Gaggelli E, Lauterbur PC. Paramagnetic contrast agents in nuclear magnetic resonance medical imaging. Semin. Nucl. Med.13(4), 364–376 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Storey P, Chen Q, Li W et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial infarction using a manganese-based contrast agent (EVP 1001–1): preliminary results in a dog model. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging23(2), 228–234 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thuen M, Singstad TE, Pedersen TB et al. Manganese-enhanced MRI of the optic visual pathway and optic nerve injury in adult rats. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging22(4), 492–500 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem KS, Pauls JM, Augath M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal connections in the macaque monkey. Neuron34(5), 685–700 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JH, Silva AC, Merkle H, Koretsky AP. Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mouse brain after systemic administration of MnCl2: dose-dependent and temporal evolution of T1 contrast. Magn. Reson. Med.53(3), 640–648 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki I, Wu YJ, Silva AC, Lynch RM, Koretsky AP. In vivo detection of neuroarchitecture in the rodent brain using manganese-enhanced MRI. Neuroimage22(3), 1046–1059 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluemke DA, Weber TM, Rubin D et al. Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: multicenter study of safety and effectiveness of direct injection protocol. Radiology228(2), 457–464 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.348(25), 2491–2499 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harisinghani MG, Saini S, Slater GJ, Schnall MD, Rifkin MD. MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes in primary pelvic carcinoma with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (Combidex): preliminary observations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging7(1), 161–163 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harisinghani MG, Saini S, Weissleder R et al. MR lymphangiography using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with primary abdominal and pelvic malignancies: radiographic-pathologic correlation. Am. J. Roentgenol.172(5), 1347–1351 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mack MG, Balzer JO, Straub R, Eichler K, Vogl TJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. Radiology222(1), 239–244 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleige G, Seeberger F, Laux D et al.In vitro characterization of two different ultrasmall iron oxide particles for magnetic resonance cell tracking. Invest. Radiol.37(9), 482–488 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato N, Kobayashi H, Hiraga A et al. Pharmacokinetics and enhancement patterns of macromolecular MR contrast agents with various sizes of polyamidoamine dendrimer cores. Magn. Reson. Med.46(6), 1169–1173 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan GP, Hu B, Liu ML, Li LY. Synthesis and evaluation of gadolinium complexes based on PAMAM as MRI contrast agents. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.57(3), 351–357 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Jo SK et al. Macromolecular MRI contrast agents with small dendrimers: pharmacokinetic differences between sizes and cores. Bioconjug. Chem.14(2), 388–394 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Douglas T, Witwer B et al. Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nature Biotechnol.19(12), 1141–1147 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd CH, Hsu HC, Chu WJ et al. Normal T-cell response and in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of T cells loaded with HIV transactivator-peptide-derived superparamagnetic nanoparticles. J. Immunol. Methods256(1–2), 89–105 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore A, Sun PZ, Cory D et al. MRI of insulitis in autoimmune diabetes. Magn. Reson. Med.47(4), 751–758 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH et al. Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nature Biotechnol.18(4), 410–414 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson L, Kircher MF, Mahmood U, Tang Y, Weissleder R. Near-infrared fluorescent nanoparticles as combined MR/optical imaging probes. Bioconjug. Chem.13(3), 554–560 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore A, Josephson L, Bhorade RM, Basilion JP, Weissleder R. Human transferrin receptor gene as a marker gene for MR imaging. Radiology221(1), 244–250 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore A, Basilion JP, Chiocca EA, Weissleder R. Measuring transferrin receptor gene expression by NMR imaging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1402(3), 239–249 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Zhang S, van Gelderen P et al. Neurotransplantation of magnetically labeled oligodendrocyte progenitors: magnetic resonance tracking of cell migration and myelination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(26), 15256–15261 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Hoekstra Y, Kamman RL et al. Specific MR imaging of human lymphocytes by monoclonal antibody-guided dextran-magnetite particles. Magn. Reson. Med.25(1), 148–157 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens ET, Feili-Hariri M, Xu H, Genove G, Morel PA. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of iron-oxide particles provides efficient labeling of dendritic cells for in vivo MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med.49(6), 1006–1013 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry CC, Charles S, Wells S, Dalby MJ, Curtis AS. The influence of transferrin stabilised magnetic nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts in culture. Int. J. Pharm.269(1), 211–225 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyoshi S, Flexman JA, Cross DJ et al. Transfection of neuroprogenitor cells with iron nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging tracking: cell viability, differentiation, and intracellular localization. Mol. Imaging Biol.7(4), 286–295 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Morikawa S, Morita M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging using hemagglutinating virus of Japan-envelope vector successfully detects localization of intra-cardially administered microglia in normal mouse brain. Neurosci. Lett.395(1), 42–45 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinds KA, Hill JM, Shapiro EM et al. Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells. Blood102(3), 867–872 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JM, Dick AJ, Raman VK et al. Serial in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of mesenchymal stem cells using intracellular iron-fluorophore labeling Circulation108(8), 1009–1014 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YL, Ye Q, Foley LM et al.In situ labeling of immune cells with iron oxide particles: an approach to detect organ rejection by cellular MRI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 1852–1857 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho C, Hitchens TK. A non-invasive approach to detecting organ rejection by MRI: monitoring the accumulation of immune cells at the transplanted organ. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol.5(6), 551–566 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalish H, Arbab AS, Miller BR et al. Combination of transfection agents and magnetic resonance contrast agents for cellular imaging: relationship between relaxivities, electrostatic forces, and chemical composition. Magn. Reson. Med.50(2), 275–282 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Bashaw LA, Miller BR et al. Characterization of biophysical and metabolic properties of cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and transfection agent for cellular MR imaging. Radiology229(3), 838–846 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Arbab AS, Douglas T, Frank JA. Preparation of magnetically labeled cells for cell tracking by magnetic resonance imaging. Methods Enzymol.386, 275–299 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorgi FL, Bhattacharya S, Huang L. Protamine sulfate enhances lipid-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther.4(9), 961–968 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostura L, Kraitchman DL, Mackay AM, Pittenger MF, Bulte JW. Feridex labeling of mesenchymal stem cells inhibits chondrogenesis but not adipogenesis or osteogenesis. NMR Biomed.17(7), 513–517 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Rad AM et al. Labeling of cells with ferumoxides-protamine sulfate complexes does not inhibit function or differentiation capacity of hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cells. NMR Biomed.18(8), 553–559 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeter M, Saleh A, Wiedermann D, Hoehn M, Jander S. Histochemical detection of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast medium uptake in experimental brain ischemia. Magn. Reson. Med.52(2), 403–406 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury. Biomed. Pharmacother.55(6), 333–339 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. The role of the superoxide and hydroxyl radicals in the degradation of DNA and deoxyribose induced by a copper-phenanthroline complex. Biochem. Pharmacol.31(17), 2801–2805 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutteridge JM, Toeg D. Iron-dependent free radical damage to DNA and deoxyribose. Separation of TBA-reactive intermediates. Int. J. Biochem.14(10), 891–893 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawelczyk E, Arbab AS, Pundit SD et al. Lack of significant effects of iron oxide labeling on the expression of transferrin receptor and ferritin in mesenchymal stem cells and HeLa cells. NMR Biomed. (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Stauber RH, Pavlakis GN. Intracellular trafficking and interactions of the HIV-1 Tat protein. Virology252(1), 126–136 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruman II, Nath A, Mattson MP. HIV-1 protein Tat induces apoptosis of hippocampal neurons by a mechanism involving caspase activation, calcium overload, and oxidative stress. Exp. Neurol.154(2), 276–288 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman CL, Williams M, Ryle LM et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide particles transactivator protein-fluorescein isothiocyanate particle labeling for in vivo magnetic resonance imaging detection of cell migration: uptake and durability. Transplantation76(7), 1043–1046 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DJ, Walton RM, Magnitsky SG et al. Structure-specific patterns of neural stem cell engraftment after transplantation in the adult mouse brain. Hum. Gene Ther.1, 1 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Kucharczyk W, Henkelman RM. Cavernous hemangiomas: dipolar susceptibility artifacts at MR imaging. Radiology187(3), 735–741 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham CH, Arai T, Yang PC et al. Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn. Reson. Med.53(5), 999–1005 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuber M, Gilson W, Schaer M, Bulte J, Kraitchman D. Shedding light on the dark spot with iron – a method that generates positive contrast in the presence of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Proc. Intl Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.13, 2608 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Seppenwoolde JH, Viergever MA, Bakker CJ. Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: the white marker phenomenon. Magn. Reson. Med.50(4), 784–790 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Miller GF, Vymazal J, Brooks RA, Frank JA. Hepatic hemosiderosis in non-human primates: quantification of liver iron using different field strengths. Magn. Reson. Med.37(4), 530–536 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen CV, Zhang X, Saab G, Gareau PJ, Rutt BK. Application of the static dephasing regime theory to superparamagnetic iron-oxide loaded cells. Magn. Reson. Med.48(1), 52–61 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahnke H, Schaeffter T. Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2 relaxometry. Magn. Reson. Med.53(5), 1202–1206 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IR, Cox IJ, Bryant DJ, Bydder GM. The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. Magn. Reson. Imaging6(5), 585–590 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frahm J, Merboldt KD, Hanicke W. Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation. Magn. Reson. Med.6(4), 474–480 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho ZH, Ro YM. Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient-echo imaging. Magn. Reson. Med.23(1), 193–200 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glover GH. 3D z-shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med.42(2), 290–299 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank JA, Anderson SA, Kalsih H et al. Methods for magnetically labeling stem and other cells for detection by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cytotherapy6(6), 621–625 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Barentsz JO et al. Magnetic resonance tracking of dendritic cells in melanoma patients for monitoring of cellular therapy. Nature Biotechnol.23(11), 1407–1413 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Pandit SD, Anderson SA et al. MRI and confocal microscopy studies of magnetically labeled endothelial progenitor cells trafficking to sites of tumor angiogenesis. Stem Cells22, 22 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson SA, Glod J, Arbab AS et al. Noninvasive MR imaging of magnetically labeled stem cells to directly identify neovasculature in a glioma model. Blood105(1), 420–425 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab AS, Jordan EK, Wilson LB et al.In vivo trafficking and targeted delivery of magnetically labeled stem cells. Hum. Gene Ther.15(4), 351–360 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar