Advances in the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease with multislice computed tomography

References

• Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation113(6), e85–e151 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(11), 1867–1878 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Shavelle DM, Mao S et al. Improved accuracy of noninvasive electron beam coronary angiography. Invest. Radiol.39(2), 73–79 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N. Engl. J. Med.328(12), 828–832 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 92–100 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur. Radiol.16(2), 256–268 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography – initial experience. Eur. J. Radiol.57(3), 331–335 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Gualerzi M et al. Intraveous contrast material administration in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Acta Biomed. Ateneo. Parmense76(2), 86–94 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cademartiri F, Runza G, Belgrano M et al. Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography. Radiol. Med. (Torino)110(1–2), 16–41 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM et al. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology232(1), 18–37 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am. Heart J.151(2), 404–411 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation12(15), 18–23 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur. Heart J.26(15), 1482–1487 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am. J. Cardiol.97(3), 343–348 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur. Radiol.16(3), 575–582 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(3), 552–557 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 147–154 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cademartiri F, Runza G, Luccichenti G et al. Coronary artery anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and role of diagnostic imaging. Radiol. Med. (Torino)111(3), 376–391 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.28(3), 616–626 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loop FD. Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. N. Engl. J. Med.334(4), 263–265 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein PD, Beemath A, Skaf E et al. Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am. J. Cardiol.96(12), 1669–1673 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H, Becker C et al. Preoperative 3D-reconstructions of ultrafast-CT images for the planning of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass operation (MIDCAB). Heart Surg. Forum1(2), 111–115 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M et al. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.21(1), 15–25 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int. J. Cardiol.89(2–3), 167–172 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.94(4), 427–430 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart92(1), 58–61 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(8), 1573–1579 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol.47(1), 36–42 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir K, Budoff MJ, Post WS et al. Electron beam CT versus helical CT scans for assessing coronary calcification: current utility and future directions. Am. Heart J.146(6), 969–977 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.15(4), 827–832 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A et al. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. Am. J. Roentgenol.176(5), 1295–1298 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al. Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37(2), 451–457 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.36(1), 326–340 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M et al. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 158–165 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby AC, Libby P, van der Wal AC. Plaque instability – the real challenge for atherosclerosis research in the next decade? Cardiovasc. Res.41(2), 321–322 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP et al. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.20(5), 1262–1275 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37(5), 1430–1435 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimasa T, Sato Y, Sugi K et al. Evaluation by multislice computed tomography of atherosclerotic coronary artery plaques in non-culprit, remote coronary arteries of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ. J.69(11), 1346–1351 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43(5), 842–847 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Koos R et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography of the heart: technique, current applications, and perspective. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol.28(4), 388–399 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salm LP, Schuijf JD, de Roos A et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. doi:10.1016/ j.euje.2005.07.002 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation76(1), 44–51 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz G, Castaner A, Betriu A et al. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N. Engl. J. Med.306(18), 1065–1070 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al. Noninvasive angiography and assessment of left ventricular function using multislice computed tomography in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care27(12), 2905–2910 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol.90(10), 1157–1160 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.95(5), 571–574 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography in hypertensive patients. Hypertension45(2), 227–232 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol.44(6), 604–611 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Radiol.15(4), 714–720 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Knez A, Sagmeister S et al. Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multidetector-row computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.28(2), 286–292 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada H, Kobayashi Y, Yasu T et al. Multi-detector computed tomography for imaging of subendocardial infarction: prediction of wall motion recovery after reperfused anterior myocardial infarction. Circ. J.68(5), 512–514 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45(12), 2042–2047 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ. J.69(5), 550–557 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW. Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(9), 1846–1849 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.16(10), 1091–1110 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Poldermans D, Shaw LJ et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging33(1), 93–104 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(7), 1318–1333 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation110(7), 835–842 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur. Heart J.25(18), 1657–1665 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation110(6), 732–737 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar