Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities

References

• Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N. Engl. J. Med.343, 392–398 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann. Surg.4, 578–585 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez LJ, Bencini L, Moretti R. Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results and critical review. Hernia8, 138–143 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carbonell AM, Harold KL, Mahmutovic AJ et al. Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am. Surg.69, 688–691 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP. Long term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch. Surg.133, 378–382 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris-Stiff GJ, Hughes LE. The outcomes of nonabsorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience. J. Am. Coll. Surg.186, 352–367 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V. Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia5, 142–147 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumelick V. Impact of polymer size on interface scar formation in a rat model. J. Surg. Res.103, 208–214 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, Walsh MD. Major mesh related complication following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg. Endosc.19, 1556–1566 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. Do multifilament alloplastic mesh increase infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.63, 765–771 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell AG, Novistsky YW, Kercher KW et al. In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methiciliin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Hernia10, 120–124 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansen B, Schumacher-Perdreau F, Peters G, Pulverer G. New aspects in the pathogenesis and prevention of polymer-associated foreign-body infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Invest. Surg.2, 361–380 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girotto JA, Chiaramonte M, Menon NG et al. Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long term superiority of autologous tissue repair. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.112, 106–114 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disa JJ, Goldberg NH, Carlton JM, Robertson BC, Slezak S. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.113, 673–675 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewart CH, Lankford AB, Gamboa MG. Successful closure of abdominal wall hernias using the component separation technique. Ann. Plast. Surg.50, 269–274 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Anthony JP. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann. Surg.232, 586–596 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellom AL. Components separation method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.86, 519–525 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissue and organs. Biomaterials27, 3675–3683 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Eris M, Cutshall WD, Hiles MC. A New biomaterial derived from small intestine submucosa and developed into a wound matrix device. Wounds14, 150–166 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Badylak SF. Regenerative medicine and developmental biology: the role of the extracellular matrix. Anat. Rec.287B, 36–41 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• McGrath JA, Eady RA. Heparan sulphate proteoglycan and wound healing in skin. J. Pathol.183, 251–252 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosir MA, Quinn CC, Wand W, Tromp G. Matrix glycosaminoglycans in the growth phase of fibroblast: more of the story in wound healing. J. Surg. Res.92, 45–52 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voytik-Harbin S, Brightman AO, Kraine MR, Waisner B, Badylak SF. Identification of extractable growth factors from small intestinal submucosa. J. Cell Biol.67, 478–491 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Hodde JP, Hiles MC. Bioactive FGF-2 in sterilized extracellular matrix. Wounds13, 195–201 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodde JP, Record RD, Liang HA, Badylak SF. Vascular endothelial growth factor in porcine-derived extracellular matrix. Endothelium8, 11–24 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodde JP, Hiles M. Virus safety of porcine derived medical devices evaluation of a viral inactivation method. Biotechol. Bioeng.79, 211–216 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badlak SF et al. Xenogenic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response. Transplantation71, 1631–1640 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman A, McPherson TB, Merrill LC, Badylak SF, Metzger DW. The Th2-restricted response to xenogenic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens. Tissue Eng.8, 53–62 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112, 1554–1560 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Simmons-Byrd A, Morff R. Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. J. Surg. Res.103, 190–202 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soiderer EE, Lantz GC, Kazacos EA, Hodde JP, Wiegand RE. Morphologic study of three collagen materials for body wall repair. J. Surg. Res.118, 161–175 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badylak SF, Park K, Peppas N, McCabe G, Yoder M. Marrow-derived cells populate scaffolds composed of xenogenic extracellular matrix. Exp. Hematol.29, 1310–1318 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, Badlak SF, Hiles MC, Voytik SL. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J. Surg. Res.60, 107–114 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng MH, Chen J, Willers KC, Xu W, Wood D. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.73B, 61–67 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Obermiller FJ, Hodde JP, McAlexander CS, Kokini K, Badylak SF. A comparison of suture retention strength for three biomaterials. Med. Sci. Monit.10, P11–P15 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Freytes DO, Badylak SF, Webster TJ, Gedds LA, Rundell AE. Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials25, 2353–2361 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak S, Kokini K, Whitson B. Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J. Surg. Res.99, 282–287 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prevel CD, Eppley BL, Summerlin DJ, Jackson JR, McCarty M, Badylak SF. Small intestinal submucosa: utilization for repair of rodent abdominal wall defects. Ann. Plast. Surg.35, 374–380 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badylak SF, Kroop B, McPherson T, Liang H, Snyder PW. Small intestinal submucosa: a rapid resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cytoplasty in a dog model. Tissue Eng.4, 379–387 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NF, Abcarian H. Short term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch. Surg.140, 549–562 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG, Lawson DC, Pappas TN. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J. Gastrointest. Surg.8, 109–112 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xanthopoulos KG, Lee JY, Gan R, Kockum K, Faye I, Boman HG. The structure of the gene for cecropin B, an antibacterial immune protein from Hyalophora cecropia. Eur. J. Biochem.172, 371–376 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holtom PD, Shinar Z, Benna J, Patzakis MJ. Porcine small intestine submucosa does not show antimicrobial properties. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.427, 18–21 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Dreau D et al. The susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection. Surg. Endosc.19, 430–435 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, Wu CC, Bible M, McPherson E. Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus Dacron™ mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.67B, 648–654 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Franklin ME, Gonzales JJ, Michaelson RP, Glass JL, Chock DA. Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernia defects in infected fields. Hernia6, 171–174 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin ME, Gonzales JJ, Glass JL. Use of porcine SIS as prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernia in contaminated fields 2-year follow-up. Hernia8, 186–189 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin ME, Vela I, Gonzalez JJ, Trevino JM. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: 5 year follow-up. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Conference. TX, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nfonsam VN, Brethauer S, Dan A, Sabnis A. Ventral hernia repair with surgsis gold. Three year experience. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference. TX, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano L, DiBartomeo N, Aceto L, Wuku M, Innocenti P. Use of prosthetic materials in incisional hernias: our clinical experience. G Chir.25, 141–145 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrand BK, Kokini K, Badylak SF, Geddes LA, Hiles MC, Morff RJ. Directional porosity of porcine small intestinal submucosa. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.27, 1235–1241 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monteiro-Riviere NA. Ultrastructural evaluation of the porcine integument. In: Swine in Biomedical Research. NY, USA, 641–655 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Harper C. Permacol™: clinical experience with a new biomaterial. Hosp. Med.62, 90–95 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod TM, Williams G, Sanders R, Green CJ. Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20 week period in the rat model. Br. J. Surg.58, 518–532 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• TOXIKON report, 1998, data on file at Tissue Science Laboratories (TSL).
   Google Scholar
• Zheng F, Lin Y, Verbeken E et al. Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.191, 1961–1970 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaleya RN. Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen in the rat. Hernia1, 1–8 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Data on file at TLS, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Norton HJ, Heniford BT. Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J. Surg. Res.129, 231–235 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RF, Hulme MJ, Mudie A, Grant RA. Skin collagen allograft in the rat. Nature258, 537–539 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Company brochure. Tissue science 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RJ, MacDonaldd JB. Degradation of collagenase substrates by Bacteriodes melaninogenicus.J. Bacteriol.81, 614–621 (1961).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldvogel FA, Swartz MN. Collagenolytic activity of bacteria. J. Bacteriol.98, 662–667 (1969).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver RF, Grant RA, Cox RW, Hulme MJ, Mudie A. Histological studies of subcutaneous and peritoneal implants of trypsin prepared dermal collagen allografts in rats. Clin. Orthop.115, 291–302 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver RF, Barker H, Cooke A. Grant RA. Dermal collagen implants. Biomaterials23, 38–40 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JR, Giordano P. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.59, 553–555 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Verey F, Munikrishnan V, Kenefick NJ, DeFriens DJ, Pullan RD. A novel biomaterial for use in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Colorectal Dis.6, 37–85 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards SK, Lear PA, Huskisson L, Saleem MA, Morgan JD. Porcine dermal collagen graft in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr. Transplant.9, 627–629 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adedeji OA, Bailey CA, Varma JS. Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal wall reconstruction. Br. J. Plast. Surg.55, 85–86 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobb GA, Shaffer J. Cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: case-controlled study of operative variables and early complications. Int. Surg.90, S24–S29 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Data of File. TEI Biosciences Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Company brochure TEI Biosciences Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Harman EA, Frykman PN, Clagett ER, Kraemer WJ. Intraabdominal and intrathoracic pressures during lifting and jumping. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.20, 195–201 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• White paper: SurgiMend™: Case Study, TEI Biosciences Inc 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Livesey S, Atkinson Y, Call T, Griffey S, Nag A. An acellular dermal transplant processed from human allograft skin retains normal extracellular matrix components and ultrasound characteristics. Poster presented at:American Association of Tissue Banks Conference. LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ, USA (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Holton LH, Kim D, Silverman RP, Rodriguez ED, Singh N, Goldberg NH. Human acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects: review of clinical experience and experimental data. J. Long Term Med. Implants15, 547–558 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viral Safety Profile, Data on file. LifeCell Corp., 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Buinewicz B, Colony LH, Smith RJ. The use of human acellular tissue matrix in abdominal wall reconstruction – a clinical perspective. LifeCell Clinical Monograph Series (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, Byrnes CK, Girotto JA, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Ann. Plastic Surg.50, 523–527 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH, Sawan KT, Goldberg NH. Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular matrix in a swine model. Hernia8, 336–342 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choe JM, Kothandapani R, James L, Bowling D. Autologous, cadaveric and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology58, 482–486 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann. Plast. Surg.52, 188–194 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper JR. Tissue regeneration using human acellular tissue matrix: a histological perspective. LifeCell Clinical Monograph Series (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Awad SS, Rao R, Berger DH, Albo D, Bellows CF. Microbiology of infected acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in patients undergoing complex abdominal closure after emergency surgery. Surg. Infect.7, 209 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with Alloderm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.116, 1263–1275 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliverman RP, Singh NK, Li EN et al. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.113, 673–675 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guy JS, Miller R, Morris JA, Diaz J, May A. Early one-stage closure in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome: fascial replacement with human acellular dermis and bipedicle flaps. Am. Surg.12, 1025–1029 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Scott BG, Welsh FJ, Pham HQ et al. Early aggressive closure of the open abdomen. J. Trauma60, 17–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolker AR, Brown DJ, Redstone JS, Scarpinato VM, Wallack MK. Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) and component separation. Ann. Plast. Surg.55, 36–42 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch EF. Repair of an abdominal wall defect after a salvage laparotomy for sepsis. J. Am. Coll. Surg.198, 324–328 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald MD, Weiss CA. Human acellular dermis for recurrent hernia. Cont. Surg.61, 276–280 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Schuster P, Singh J, Safadi BY, Wren SM. The use of acellular dermal matrix for contaminated abdominal wall defects: wound status predicts success. Presented at the 30th Association of VA Surgeons Meeting. OH, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Brown P, Rohwer RG, Gajdusek DC. Sodium hydroxide decontamination of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease virus. N. Engl. J. Med.310, 727 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viral inactivation study during the tuttoplast allograft manufacturing process. Institut Pasteur Texcel. Paris Franvce 1994. Data on file at Tutogen Medical, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dcurtins M, Buchmann P. Bovine pericardium – a new graft material for hernial repair. Res. Exp. Med. (Berl.)180, 11–14 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V. Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia5, 113–118 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James NL, Poole-Warren LA, Schindhelm K et al. Comparitive evaluation of treated bovine pericardium as a xenograft for hernia repair. Biomaterials12, 801–809 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapan S, Kapan M, Goksoy E, Karabicak I, Okar H. Comparison of PTFE, pericardium bovine and fascia lata for repair of incisional hernia in rat model, experimental study. Hernia7, 39–43 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Tuil C, Saxena AK, Willital GH. Experience with management of anterior abdominal wall defects using bovine pericard. Hernia10, 41–47 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oray BN. Veritas collagen matrix safety studies. Synovis Surgical Innovations 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Company brochure. Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Mooradian DL, Lambert A, Wonsetler R, Oray BN. Residual DNA in biological sling materials: a comparison between PO-treated bovine pericardium, human dermis, solvent-extracted and freeze dried cadaveric fascia lata. Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Urology and Engineering Inc. FL, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Oray BN, Lambert A, Wonsetler R, Mooradian DL. Physical and biochemical characterization of a novel non-crosslinked propylene oxide-treated acellular collagen matrix: comparison with solvent extracted and freeze dried cadaveric fascia lata. Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Urology and Engineering Inc. FL, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lai JY, Chang PY, Lin JN. Body wall repair using small intestinal submucosa seeded with cells. J. Pediatr. Surg.38, 1752–1755 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atala A, Baude SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik A. Tissue engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplast. Lancet367, 1241–1246 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip D, Chen SS, Fitzgerald W, Orenstein J, Margolis L, Kleinman HK. Complex extracellular matrices promote tissue specific stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells23, 288–296 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansen PL, Mertens PR, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The biology of hernia formation. Surgery136, 1–4 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao C, Prevel P, Koch S et al. Modification of collagen matrices for enhancing angiogenesis. Cells Tissues Organs178, 189–196 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar