Resurrection of hip resurfacing: what is the evidence?

References

• Amstutz HC, Gregoris P. Metal on metal bearings in hip arthropolasty. Clin. Orthop.32(Suppl.), S11–S34 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke IC. Wear-screening and joint simulation studies vs materials selection and prosthesis design. Crc. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.8(1), 29–91 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke IC. Symposium on surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Biomechaniscs: multifactorial design choices-an essential compromise? Orthop. Clin. N. Am.13(4), 681–707 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smih-Petersen MN. Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.30, 59–75 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Charnley JC. Arthroplasty of the hip: a new operation. Lancet i,1129–1132 (1961).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charnley JC. Tissue reactions to polytetrafluoroethylene (letter). Lancet ii,1379 (1963).
   Google Scholar
• Gerard Y. Hip arthroplasty by matching cups. Clin. Orthop.134, 23–35 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• McKee GK, ChenSC. The statistics of the McKee-Farrar method of total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop.95, 26–33 (1973).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trentani C., Vaccarino F. The Paltrieri-Trentani hip joint resurface arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.134, 36–40 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman MAR, Cameron HU, Brown GC. Cemented double cup arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop.134, 45–52 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman MAR, Swanson SAV, Cameron H et al. ICLH Cemented double cup total replacement of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.60, 137–138 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Wanger H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop.134, 102–130 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Clarke IC, Cristie J et al. Total hip articular replacement by internal eccentric shell. Clin. Orthop.128, 261–284 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Graff-Radford A, Gruen TA et al. THARIES surface replacements. Clin. Orthop.134, 87–101 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC. Surface replacement arthroplasty. In: Hip Arthroplasty. Amstutz HC (Ed.). Churchill Livingstone, NY, USA 295–333 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Kabo M, Dorey FJ. Surface replacement arthroplasty: evolution of today’s ingrowth-fixed design. In: Osteoarthritis in the Young Adult Hip. Reynolds D, Freeman M (Eds). Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK 251–275 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Buechel FF. Resurfacing total hip replacement for avascular necrosis in young patients: durability, revision options and future technology. Presented at the 6th Annual Current Concepts in Joint Replacement Symposium. Orlando, FL, USA (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Weber BG. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin. Orthop.329S, S69–S77 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Wagner H. Preliminary results of uncemented metal-on-metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.329, S78–S88 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• McMinn DJ, Treacy R, Lin K et al. Metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. Clin. Orthop.329, S89–S98 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B. The viability of the femoral head after resurfacing hip arthroplasty in humans. Clin. Orthop.291, 171–184 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Mirra J, Amstutz HC. Viability of the femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. Arthroplasty15(1), 120–122 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello WN, Ireland PH, Tramell TR et al. Conservative total hip arthroplasty: a procedure to conserve bone stock. Part 1 and Part 2. Clin. Orthop.134, 59–74 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Kane TJ III, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: A 16 year follow up study. J. Arthroplasty9, 453–456 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi ANB, Porter ML, Trail IA et al. Long term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in youn patients. J. Bone Joint Surg.B75, 616–623 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Malchau P, Herberts P, Soderman P, Oden A. Update and validation of results from the Swedisch Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979–1998. Procs 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki K, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg.86B, 185–189 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.87B, 163–166 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Pynsent PB, Pradhan C, Ziaee H. Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.441, 91–98 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Ragland PS, Marker D. Resurfacing Hip Aarthroplasty. Comparison of a minimally invasive versus standard approach. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.441, 125–131 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J. Bone Joint Surg.B86, 177–184 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Treacy RCB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB: Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty a minimum follow-up of five years. J. Bone Joint Surg.87B, 167–170 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Beaulè PE, Frederick JD, Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.86A, 28–39 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Join Surg.86B, 172–176 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J. Bone Joint Surg.87B, 463–464 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Fordyce MJF. Non operative management of a peri-prosthetic subcapital fracture after metal-on-metal Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg.85B, 1055–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg.87B, 320–323 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. N. Am.36, 187–193 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case CP, Langkamer VG, James C et al. Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants. J. Bone Joint Surg.76B, 701–712 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrit K, Brown SA. Release of hexavalent chromium from corrosion of stainless steel and cobalt chromium alloys. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.29, 627–633 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke MT, Lee PTH, Arora A, Villar RN. Levels of metal ions after small and large diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.85B6, 913–917 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Back DL, Young DA, Shimmin AJ. How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing? Clin. Orthop.438, 177–181 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V et al. Elevated serum cobalt with metal-on-metal articulating surfaces. J. Bone Joint Surg.79B, 316–321 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V et al. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.85A, 2168–2173 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Research Group. Global markets for hip reconstructive devices 2002. Millennium Research Group, Toronto, Canada (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Moroni A, Cadossi M, Savarino S, Greco M, Baldini N, Giannini S. Ion release from metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants do not differ from standard metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Orthopaedic Research Society 52nd Annual Meeting Chicago (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Dowson D, Goldsmith AA. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (H)215, 161–170 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lilikakis AK, Arora A, Villar RN. Early rehabilitation comparing hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Hip Intl.15(4), 189–194 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JR, Palmer SJ, Wimhurst JA, Villar RN. Bone loss at hip resurfacing: A comparison with total hip arthroplasty. Hip Intl.15(4), 195–198 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar