New developments in antibradycardic devices

References

• Markewitz A. Annual report 2004 of the German cardiac pacemaker registry. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol.17(3), 146–173 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barold S, Zipes D. Cardiac pacemakers and antiarhythmic devices. In: Heart Disease. A textbook of Cardivascular Medicine. Braunwald E (Ed.). WB Saunders, NY, USA, 705–741 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Gras D, Mabo P, Tang T et al. Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure: preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.21, 2249–2255 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penicka M, Bartunek J, De Bruyne B et al. Improvement of left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy is predicted by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography. Circulation109, 978–983 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ et al. Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block. Circulation102, 3053–3059 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E et al; CARE-HF Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med.352(15), 1539–1549 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med.346, 1845–1853 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funck RC, Blanc JJ, Mueller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Bailleul C, Maisch B; BioPace Study Group. Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the ‘Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)’ study. Europace8, 629–635 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollak WM, Simmons JD, Interian A Jr, Castellanos A, Myerburg R, Mitriani RD. Pacemaker diagnostics: a critical appraisal of current technology. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26, 76–98 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padeletti L, Michelucci A, Fröhlig G, Corbucci G, van Oort G, Barold SS. Digital technology in cardiac pacing: methods for morphology analysis of sensed endocavitary signals. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.14(1), 9–16 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simantirakis EN, Vardas PE. Cardiac pacing in sleep apnoea: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Europace8, 984–987 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantoni C, Raffa S, Regoli F et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves heart rate profile and heart rate variability of patients with moderate to severe heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(10), 1875–1882 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye G, Arthur W, Edgar D, Lippert M, Czygan G. The use of unipolar intracardiac impedance for discrimination of haemodynamically stable and unstable arrhythmias in man. Europace8, 988–993 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohrmann ML, Goldschlager NF. Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents and lead electrodes. Cardiol. Clin.3(4), 527–537 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke M, Liu B, Schuller H et al. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. European Microny Study Group. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.21(8), 1567–1575 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria D, Gurevitz O, Bar-Lev D et al. Use of automatic threshold tracking function with non-low polarization leads: risk for algorithm malfunction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.27(4), 453–459 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M, Frohlig G, Schwerdt H, Becker R, Schieffer H. Reliability of an automatic sensing algorithm. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.15(11 Pt 2), 1880–1885 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugada P. What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up? Clin. Res. Cardiol.95(Suppl. 3), III3–III9 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Theuns DA, Res JC, Jordaens LJ. Home monitoring in ICD therapy: future perspectives. Europace5(2), 139–142 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toselli T, Regoli F, Pratola C et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator home monitoring technology. Ital. Heart J.5(Suppl. 1), 30S–31S (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lamaison D, Motreff P, Jean F et al. [The place of telemedicine in rhythmology and cardiac pacing]. Arch. Mal. Coeur Vaiss.97(11), 1160–1164 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallbruck K, Stellbrink C, Santini M, Gill J, Hartmann A, Wunderlich E. The value of permanent follow-up of implantable pacemakers – first results of a European trial. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.)47(Suppl. 1 Pt 2), 950–953 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fauchier L, Sadoul N, Kouakam C et al. Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assisted long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.28(Suppl. 1), S255–S259 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellery S, Pakrashi T, Paul V, Sack S on behalf of the Home CARE Phase 0 Study Investigators. Predicting mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients with Home Monitoring – The Home CARE pilot study. Clin. Res. Cardiol.95(Suppl. 3), iii29–iii35 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout MF, Prinzen FW, Arts T et al. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation98(6), 588–595 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpawich PP, Rabah R, Haas JE. Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.22(9), 1372–1377 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxon LA, Stevenson WG, Middlekauff HR, Stevenson LW. Increased risk of progressive hemodynamic deterioration in advanced heart failure patients requiring permanent pacemakers. Am. Heart J.125(5 Pt 1), 1306–1310 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA et al; Mode Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation107(23), 2932–2937 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual chamber And VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA288(24), 3115–3123 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioli G. Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. A prospective study. Eur. Heart J.19(2), 282–286 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli AV, Castellani ET, Vivoli D, Sgura FA, Mattioli G. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients without prior atrial fibrillation: a prospective study. Clin. Cardiol.21(2), 117–122 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med.342(19), 1385–1391 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO et al. Mode selection trial in sinus-node dysfunction. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med.346(24), 1854–1862 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JG, Coletta AP, Nikitin N, Louis A, Clark A. Update of clinical trials from the American College of Cardiology 2003. EPHESUS, SPORTIF-III, ASCOT, COMPANION, UK-PACE and T-wave alternans. Eur. J. Heart Fail.5(3), 391–398 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.42(4), 614–623 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK, Andersen HR. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart90(6), 661–666 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med.338(16), 1097–1104 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmrich E, Kramer LI, Fischer W, Dorr T, Reinecke H. [Support of spontaneous atrioventricular conduction in patients with DDR(R) pacemakers: effectiveness and safety]. Herz26(1), 69–74 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stierle U, Kruger D, Vincent AM et al. An optimized AV delay algorithm for patients with intermittent atrioventricular conduction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.21(5), 1035–1043 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace1(2), 113–120 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoure A, Frohlig G, Galley D et al. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.28(Suppl. 1), S43–S46 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Shea JB, Fox V et al. Randomized pilot study of a new atrial-based minimal ventricular pacing mode in dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm1(2), 160–167 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlig G. [The role of cardiac pacing in atrial arrhythmia prevention]. Z. Kardiol.94(Suppl. 4), IV/53–IV/59 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa M, Suyama K, Kurita T et al. Acute effects of different atrial pacing sites in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of single site and biatrial pacing. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.24(10), 1470–1478 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou P, Anselme F, Kirchhof CJ et al. Coronary sinus pacing prevents induction of atrial fibrillation. Circulation96(6), 1893–1898 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci R, Santini M, Puglisi A et al. Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complex number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: a randomized prospective cross over study. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.5(1), 33–44 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiberg S, Lonnerholm S, Jensen SM, Blomstrom P, Ringqvist I, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Effect of right atrial overdrive pacing in the prevention of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized study, the PAF-PACE study. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26(9), 1841–1848 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann E, Sulke N, Edvardsson N et al; Atrial Fibrillation Therapy Trial Investigators. New insights into the initiation of atrial fibrillation: a detailed intraindividual and interindividual analysis of the spontaneous onset of atrial fibrillation using new diagnostic pacemaker features. Circulation113(16), 1933–1941 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coumel P, Friocourt P, Mugica J, Attuel P, Leclercq JF. Long-term prevention of vagal atrial arrhythmias by atrial pacing at 90/minute: experience with 6 cases. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.6(3 Pt 1), 552–560 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sra J, Biehl M, Blanck Z et al. Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation following transvenous atrial defibrillation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.21(5), 1105–1110 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Atrial pacing for suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion. Eur. Heart J.21(14), 1167–1176 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol. Heart82(3), 319–324 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel CW, Gronefeld G, Ehrlich JR, Li YG, Hohnloser SH. Prevention of immediate reinitiation of atrial tachyarrhythmias by high-rate overdrive pacing: results from a prospective randomized trial. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.14(9), 954–959 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MA, Weachter R, Pollak S et al. The effect of atrial pacing therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency: results of a randomized trial in patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(11), 1926–1932 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padeletti L, Purerfellner H, Adler SW et al. Combined efficacy of atrial septal lead placement and atrial pacing algorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.14(11), 1189–1195 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewalter T, Yang A, Pfeiffer D et al. Individualized selection of pacing algorithms for the prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation: results from the VIP registry. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.29(2), 124–134 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchert A, Bub E, Braun M et al. Reduktion des AF-burden bei Schrittmacherpatienten mit paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern mit getriggerter gegenüber getriggerter plus kontinuierlicher Vorhofstimulation. Z. Kardiol.93(Suppl. 3), 15–4 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yang A, Hochhäusler M, Saborowski F et al. Einfluss der induktionsmechanismen von paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern auf die Dauer der Arrhythmieepisoden bei Patienten mit implantiertem Zweikammerschrittmacher. Z. Kardiol.93(Suppl. 3), 15–4 (2004) (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein AD, Daubert JC, Fletcher RD. The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive rate, and multisite pacing. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology/Britisch Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25, 260–264 (2002) (Abstract).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar