Preventing secondary cataract and anterior capsule contraction by modification of intraocular lenses

References

• Olson RJ, Werner L, Mamalis N et al. New intraocular lens technology. Am. J. Ophthalmol.140, 709–716 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horwitz J, Jaffe NS. Opacification of the posterior capsule. In: Lens and Cataract, Gower Medical Publishing. New York, NY, USA, 21992.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama T. Posterior capsular opacification: Classification and pathogenesis. J. Jpn. Cataract Res.17, 34–40 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK et al. Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes.Part 2: explanted intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.26, 1807–1818 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormstone IM, Tamiya S, Anderson I et al. TGF-β2-induced matrix modification and cell transdifferentiation in the human lens capsular bag. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43, 2301–2308 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saika S, Miyamoto T, Tanaka S et al. Response of lens epithelial cells to injury: role of lumican in epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 2094–2102 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake K, Ota I, Ichihashi S et al. New classification of capsular block syndrome. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.24, 1230–1234 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obara Y, Akagi Y, Ibaraki N et al. Guidelines for management of cataract. J. Jpn Cataract Res.16 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Matsushima H, Mukai K, Obara Y et al. Analysis of cytoskeletal proteins in posterior capsule opacification after implantation of acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.30, 187–194 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyata A, Uchida N, Nakajima K et al. Clinical and experimental observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses. Jpn J. Ophthalmol.45, 564–569 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishihara H, Yaguchi S, Onishi T et al. Surface scattering in implanted hydrophobic intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.29, 1385–1388 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F. Reduction in the area of the anterior capsule opening after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Am. J. Ophthalmol.123, 441–447 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F et al. Changes in posterior capsule opacification after poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.27, 817–824 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ram J, Kaushik S, Brar GS et al. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers32, 375–382 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagata T, Watanabe I. Optic shape edge or convexity. Comparison of effects on posterior capsular opacification. Jpn J. Opthalmol.40, 397–403 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi O, Nishi K. Preventing posterior capsule opacification by creating a discontinuous sharp bend in the capsule. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.25, 521–529 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffarth GU, Golescu A, Becker KA et al. Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology110, 772–780 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findl O, Buehl W, Menapace R et al. Long-term effect of sharp optic edges of a polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology112, 2004–2008 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi O, Nishi K, Akura J. Speed of capsular bend formation at the optic edge of acrylic, silicone, and poly(methyl methacrylate) lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.28, 431–437 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidbauer JM, Escobar-Gomez M, Apple DJ et al. Effect of haptic angulation on posterior capsule opacification in modern foldable lenses with a square, truncated optic edge. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.28, 1251–1255 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagamoto T. Up-to-date information on acrylic foldable intraocular lenses. J. Eye20, 577–583 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mamalis N, Crandall AS, Linebarger E et al. Effect of intraocular lens size on posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.21, 99–102 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meacock WR, Spalton DJ, Boyce JF et al. Effect of optic size on posterior capsule opacification: 5.5 mm versus 6.0 mm AcrySof intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.27, 1194–1198 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi O, Nishi K. Effect of the optic size of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.29, 348–353 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corydon C, Lindholt M, Knudsen EB et al. Capsulorhexis contraction after cataract surgery: comparison of sharp anterior edge and modified anterior edge acrylic intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 796–799 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadros A, Bhatt UK, Abdul Kar Karim MN et al. Removal of lens epithelial cells and the effect on capsulorhexis size. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.31, 1569–1574 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobari I, Iwaki Y, Miyake K. Effect of tranilast eyedrops in preventing posterior capsule opacification: preliminary report. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.25, 1394–1399 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L, Lobefalo L, Ciancaglini M et al. Heparin eyedrops to prevent posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.23, 440–446 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inan UU, Ozturk F, Kaynak S et al. Prevention of posterior capsule opacification by intraoperative single-dose pharmacologic agents. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.27, 1079–1087 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legler UF, Apple DJ, Assia EI et al. Inhibition of posterior capsule opacification: the effect of colchicine in a sustained drug delivery system. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.19, 462–470 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishi O, Nishi K, Morita T et al. Effect of intraocular sustained release of indomethacin on postoperative inflammation and posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.22, 806–810 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsushima H, Mukai K, Gotoo N et al. The effects of drug delivery via hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens systems on the epithelial cells in culture. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging36, 386–392 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundgren B, Holst A, Trnholm A et al. Cellular reaction following cataract surgery with implantation of the heparin-surface-modified intraocular lens in rabbits with experimental uveitis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.18, 602–606 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah SM, Spalton DJ. Comparison of the postoperative inflammatory response in the normal eye with heparin-surface-modified and poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.21, 579–585 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther-Nielson A, Johansen J, Pedersen GK et al. Posterior capsule opacification and neodymium: YAG capsulotomy with heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.24, 940–944 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okajima Y, Saika S, Sawa MJ. Effect of surface coating an acrylic intraocular lens with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) polymer on lens epithelial cell line behavior. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 666–671 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigeta M, Tanaka T, Koike N et al. Suppression of fibroblast and bacterial adhesion by MPC coating on acrylic intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 859–866 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eloy R, Parrat D, Duc TM et al. In vitro evaluation of inflammatory cell response after CF4 plasma surfacemodification of poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.19, 364–370 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsushima H, Iwamoto H, Mukai K et al. Active oxygen processing for acrylic intraocular lenses to prevent posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 1035–1040 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linnola RJ, Holst A. Evaluation of a 3Hpieces silicone intraocular lens with poly (methyl methacrylate) haptics. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.24, 1509–1514 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Nakamae K, Yamaguchio K. Mobility of molecular chain on surface of polymer material. Polymer applications42, 522–525 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Iida T. Effect of adhesion properties of UV curing adhesive by UV ozone surface modification. Technology on adhesion and sealing46, 207–210 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mateo NB, Ratner BD. Relating the surface properties of intraocular lens materials to endothelial cell adhesion damage. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.30, 853–860 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick HB, Frohn A, Augustin AJ et al. Physicochemical surface properties of various intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic. Res.33, 303–309 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsushima H, Iwamoto H, Mukai K et al. Prevention of posterior capsular opacification using round-edged PMMA IOL. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 1133–1134 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arima Y, Horikawa T, Iwata H. Cell adhesion on the surface preadsorbed with fibronectin and albumin. Polymer Preprint54, 2244 (2005).
   Google Scholar