Ten reasons why dermoscopy is beneficial for the evaluation of skin lesions

References

• Marghoob A, Braun R, Kopf A. Atlas of Dermoscopy. Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tripp JM, Kopf AW, Marghoob AA, Bart RS. Management of dysplastic nevi: a survey of fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.46, 674–682 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehal KS, Oliveria SA, Marghoob AA et al. Use of and beliefs about dermoscopy in the management of patients with pigmented lesions: a survey of dermatology residency programmes in the United States. Melanoma Res.12, 601–605 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenyi ZB. Dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) of pigmented skin lesions. Current status and evolving trends. Dermatol. Clin.15, 79–95 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf IH, Smolle J, Soyer HP, Kerl H. Sensitivity in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res.8, 425–429 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch. Dermatol.137, 1343–1350 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohrbaugh C, Shanteau J. Context, process and experience: research on applied judgment and decision making. In: Handbook of Applied Cognition. Durso F (Ed.). John Wiley, NY, USA, 115–139 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gachon J, Beaulieu P, Sei JF et al. First prospective study of the recognition process of melanoma in dermatological practice. Arch. Dermatol.141, 434–438 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.48, 679–693 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolianitis C, Kelly J, Wolfe R, Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Arch. Dermatol.141, 1008–1014 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. Br. J. Dermatol.154, 431–437 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol.3, 159–165 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun RP, Rabinovitz HS, Oliviero M, Kopf AW, Saurat JH. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.52, 109–121 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder M, Puespoeck-Schwarz M, Steiner A et al. Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.36, 197–202 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyanova P. A beneficial effect of a short-term formal training course in epiluminescence microscopy on the diagnostic performance of dermatologists about cutaneous malignant melanoma. Skin Res. Technol.9, 269–273 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranski JV, Petrusic WM. Probing the locus of confidence judgments: experiments on the time to determine confidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.24, 929–945 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann L, Radford M, Beurnett P et al. Cross-cultural differences in self-reported decision making style and confidence. Int. J. Psych.33, 325–335 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvenuto-Andrade C, Agero A, Dusza S, Halpern A, Marghoob A. Level of confidence in diagnosis: clinical examination versus dermoscopic examination. Derm. Surg.32, 742–748 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen MH, Cohen BJ, Shotkin JD, Morrison PT. Surgical prophylaxis of malignant melanoma. Ann. Surg.213, 308–314 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli P, De Giorgi V, Crocetti E et al. Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the ‘dermoscopy era’: a retrospective study 1997–2001. Br. J. Dermatol.150, 687–692 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, Batrac A, McCarthy WH. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch. Dermatol.137, 1583–1589 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binder M, Schwarz M, Winkler A et al. Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. Arch. Dermatol.131, 286–291 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun RP, Kaya G, Masouye I, Krischer J, Saurat JH. Histopathologic correlation in dermoscopy: a micropunch technique. Arch. Dermatol.139, 349–351 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen CS, Elias M, Busam K, Rajadhyaksha M, Marghoob AA. Multimodal in vivo optical imaging, including confocal microscopy, facilitates presurgical margin mapping for clinically complex lentigo maligna melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol.153, 1031–1036 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JK. Use of digital epiluminescence microscopy to help define the edge of lentigo maligna. Arch. Dermatol.140, 1095–1100 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Delfino M. Clinical and dermatoscopic criteria for the preoperative evaluation of cutaneous melanoma thickness. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.40, 61–68 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh PM, Glusac EJ, Alvarez-Franco M, Berwick M, Bolognia JL. Numerous, small, darkly pigmented melanocytic nevi: the cheetah phenotype. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.48, 707–713 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feit NE, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA. Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography. Br. J. Dermatol.150, 706–714 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suneja T, Smith ED, Chen GJ, Zipperstein KJ, Fleischer AB Jr, Feldman SR. Waiting times to see a dermatologist are perceived as too long by dermatologists: implications for the dermatology workforce. Arch. Dermatol.137, 1303–1307 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson CC, Resneck JS Jr, Kimball AB. Generational differences in practice patterns of dermatologists in the United States: implications for workforce planning. Arch. Dermatol.140, 1477–1482 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccolo D, Peris K, Chimenti S, Argenziano G, Soyer HP. Jumping into the future using teledermoscopy. Skinmed1, 20–24 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro M, James WD, Kessler R et al. Comparison of skin biopsy triage decisions in 49 patients with pigmented lesions and skin neoplasms: store-and-forward teledermatology vs face-to-face dermatology. Arch. Dermatol.140, 525–528 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piccolo D, Ferrari A, Peris K, Diadone R, Ruggeri B, Chimenti S. Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study. Br. J. Dermatol.147, 481–486 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Cerroni L et al. A pilot study of a combined dermoscopic-pathological approach to the telediagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms. J. Telemed. Telecare.10, 34–38 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Kirsner RS. Skin cancer screening by dermatologists: prevalence and barriers. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.46, 710–714 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiman A, Barzilai DA, Barankin B, Natsheh A, Shear NH. National appraisal of dermatology residency training: a Canadian study. Arch. Dermatol.141, 1100–1104 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar