DMEK: the Grand Prix of cornea transplant surgery

References

• Eye Bank Association of America. 2012 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Eye Bank Association of America; Washington DC, USA: 2013
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel A. Eine neue Methode der Hornhauttransplantation. Archiv fur Ophthalmologie 1888;34:108
   Google Scholar
• Tillet CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1956;41:530-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17:618-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK): pursuing the ideal goals of endothelial replacement. Eye 2003;17:982-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melles GR, Lander F, van Dooren BR, et al. Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty through a sclerocorneal pockect incision. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1850-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the Descemet’s membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 2004;23:286-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg 2006;32:411-18
   Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25:886-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1179-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25:987-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:1382-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2368-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Descemet. membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:1082-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouTube. Available from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuC7ZjHGICc&sns=em
   Google Scholar
• Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: why aren’t we all doing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? Cornea 2012;31:469-71
   Google Scholar
• Dirisamer M, van Dijk K, Dapena I, et al. Prevention and management of graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:280-91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moshirfar M, Jarstad A, Khalifa YM. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: why does the donor tissue roll? Cornea 2013;32:e52-3
   Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized “no-touch” technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:88-94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steven P, Le Blanc C, Velten K, et al. Optimizing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative ocular coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:1135-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price MO, Price FW. Handheld slit beam techniques to facilitate DMEK and DALK. Cornea 2013;32:722-4
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. A method to confirm correct orientation of Descemet membrane during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:922-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman PV, Dye P, Holiman J, et al. Eliminating the possibility of upside down DMEK grafts: a novel stromal side S stamp technique for DMEK. Presented at: annual meeting of the Eye Bank Assoc of America and The Cornea Society; 15 November 2013; New Orleans, LA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2361-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L, et al. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1578-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Hofmann J, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Novel maneuver facilitating Descemet membrane unfolding in the anterior chamber. Cornea 2013;32:370-3
   Google Scholar
• Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Ham L, et al. Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in Decsemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:29-35
   Google Scholar
• Güell JL, Morral M, Gris O, et al. Bimanual technique for insertion and positioning of endothelium-Descemet membrane in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013;32:1521-6
   Google Scholar
• Droutsas K, Giallouros E, Melles GR, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: learning curve of a single surgeon. Cornea 2013;32:1075-9
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk K, Ham L, Tse WH, et al. Near complete visual recovery and refractive stability in modern corneal transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2013;36:13-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Ham L, Droutsas K, et al. Learning Curve in Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: first Series of 135 Consecutive Cases. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2147-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J, Dirisamer M, Naveiras M, et al. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:871-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindl LM, Riss S, Adler W, et al. Split cornea transplantation: relationship between storage time of split donor tissue and outcome. Ophthalmology 2013;120:899-907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaurasia S, Price FW Jr, Gunderson L, Price MO. Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: clinical Results of Single Versus Triple Procedures (Combined with Cataract Surgery). Ophthalmology 2014;121(2):454-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012;119:528-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham L, Dapena I, Moutsouris K, et al. Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of corneal dehydration-induced hyperopic shift on intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1455-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirisamer M, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. Efficacy of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after learning curve of 25 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:1435-43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:47-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droutsas K, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. Visual acuity following Descemet-membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): first 100 cases operated on for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2010;227:467-77
   Google Scholar
• Ham L, van Luijk C, Dapena I, et al. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:521-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham L, Dapena I, Van Der Wees J, Melles GR. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 3-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:1016-17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quilendrino R, Höhn H, Tse WH, et al. Do we overestimate the endothelial cell “loss” after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? Curr Eye Res 2013;38:260-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshu A, Price MO, Tan DT, Price FW Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57:236-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutsouris K, Dapena I, Ham L, et al. Optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy in the early detection of graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:1369-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh RY, Quilendrino R, Musa FU, et al. Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2013;120:240-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Wessel JM, et al. Graft Adhesion in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Dependent on Size of Removal of Host’s Descemet Membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:155-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, et al. Donor tissue culture conditions and outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:1007-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012;119:536-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Ham L, Netuková M, et al. Incidence of early allograft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:1341-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoeruek E, Hofmann J, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Histological and ultrastructural findings of corneal tissue after failed Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Ham L, Lie J, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two-year results. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2009;84:237-43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ham L, Dapena I, van Luijk C, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond) 2009;10:1990-8
   Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. DMEK Complications. Cornea 2013;33:101-4
   Google Scholar
• Ham L, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Causes of primary donor failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:639-44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dapena I, Yeh RY, Baydoun L, et al. Potential causes of incomplete visual rehabilitation at 6 months postoperative after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:780-8
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Yamazaki N, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2013;120:923-30
   Google Scholar
• Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Maier PC, Reinhard T. Correlation between visual acuity and interface reflectivity measured by pentacam following DSAEK. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:e1-4
   Google Scholar
• Yoeruek E, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after failed primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results. Cornea 2013;32:1414-17
   Google Scholar
• Dapena I, Dapena L, Dirisamer M, et al. Visual acuity and endothelial cell density following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2011;86:395-401
   Google Scholar
• Dirisamer M, Dapena I. Ham L, et al. patterns of corneal endothelialization and corneal clearance after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:543-55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirisamer M, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial transfer: “free-floating” donor Descemet implantation as a potential alternative to “keratoplasty”. Cornea 2012;31:194-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cursiefen C, Steven P, Roters S, Heindl LM. Prevention and management of complications in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Ophthalmologe 2013;110:614-21
   Google Scholar
• Heindl LM, Koch KR, Bucher F, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with glaucoma implants. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:e241-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and hybrid techniques for managing failed penetrating grafts. Cornea 2013;32:1-4
   Google Scholar
• Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, et al. Ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1186-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musa FU, Cabrerizo J, Quilendrino R, et al. Outcomes of phacoemulsification after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:836-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price FW. Jr, Price MO. One-year outcomes in eyes remaining phakic after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Koizumi N, Okumura N, Ueno M, et al. Rho-Associated Kinase Inhibitor drop treatment as a possible medical treatment for Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy. Cornea 2013;32:1167-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar