17
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Profile

Gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% in the treatment of bacterial keratitis

, , &
Pages 21-27 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Pollock GA, McKelvie PA, McCarty DJ, White, JF, Mallari, PL, Taylor, HR. In vivo effects of fluoroquinolones on rabbit corneas. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.33, 517–521 (2003).
  • Kowalski RP, Kowalski BR, Romanowski EG, Mah FS, Thompson PP, Gordon YJ. The in vitro impact of moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin concentration (0.5% vs 0.3%) and the addition of benzalkonium chloride on antibacterial efficacy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.142, 730–735 (2006).
  • Keam SJ, Croom KF, Keating GM. Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the US. Drugs65, 695–724 (2005).
  • Kaliamurthy J, Nelson Jesudasan CA, Geraldine P, Parmar P, Kalavathy CM, Thomas PA. Comparison of in vitro susceptibilities of ocular bacterial isolates to gatifloxacin and other topical antibiotics. Ophthalmic. Res. 37, 117–122 (2005).
  • McDermot M, Wheater M. In vitro comparison of the effects of clinically available ophthalmic solution of gatifloxacin 0.3% and moxifloxacin 0.5% on human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cell adhesion and migration and on collagen type IV protein expression. Cornea25, S255–S30 (2006).
  • Walter K, Tyler ME. Severe corneal toxicity after topical fluoroquinolone therapy: report of two cases. Cornea25, S855–S857 (2006).
  • Forster RK. Conrad Behrens Lecture. The management of infectious keratitis as we approach the 21st Century. CLAO J.24, 175–180 (1998).
  • Goldstein MH, Kowalski RP, Gordon YJ. Emerging fluoroquinolone resistance in bacterial keratitis: a 5-year review. Ophthalmology106, 1313–1318 (1999).
  • Garg P, Sharma S, Rao GN. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas keratitis. Ophthalmology106, 1319–1323 (1999).
  • Kunimoto DY, Sharma S, Garg P, Rao GN. In vitro susceptibility of bacterial keratitis pathogens to ciprofloxacin. Emerging resistance. Ophthalmology105, 1853–1854 (1999).
  • Bower KS, Kowalski RP, Gordon YJ. Fluoroquinolones in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol.121, 712–715 (1996).
  • Mather R, Karenchak L, Romanowski E, Kowalski RP. Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics. Am. J. Ophthalmol.133, 463–466 (2002).
  • Mah FS. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: new topical agents in the war on ocular bacterial infections. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.15, 316–320 (2004).
  • Fung-Tomc J, Gradelski E, Huczco E, Minassian B, Bonner DP. Activity of gatifloxacin against strains resistant to ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and its ability to select for less susceptible bacterial variants. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents18, 77–80. (2001).
  • Perry CM, Ormrod D, Hurst M, Onrust SV. Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections. Drugs62, 169–207 (2002).
  • Drlica K, Zhao X. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Micro. Molec. Bio. Rev.61, 377–392 (1997).
  • McLeod SD. Integrating Iquix, Vigamox, and Zymar in the management of ocular infectious disease. Ophthalmol. Clin.46(4), 41–45 (2006).
  • Allergan, Inc. NDA 21-493 (2003).
  • Parmar P, Salman A, Kalavathy CM et al. Comparison of topical gatifloxacin 0.3% and ciprofloxacin 0.3% for the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol.141, 282–286 (2006).
  • Morrissey I, Burnett R, Viljoen L, Robbins M. Surveillance of the susceptibility of ocular bacterial pathogens to the fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin and other antimicrobials in Europe during 2001/2002. J. Infect.49, 109–114 (2004).
  • Blondeau JM, Borsos S, Hesje CK. Antimicrobial efficacy of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin with and without benzalkonium chloride compared with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Chemother.19,146–151 (2007).
  • Kowalski RP, Dhaliwal DK, Karenchak LM et al. Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin: an in vitro susceptibility comparison to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin using bacterial keratitis isolates. Am. J. Ophthalmol.136, 500–505 (2003).
  • Callegan MC, Ramirez R, Kane ST, Cochran DC, Jensen H. Antibacterial activity of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against ocular pathogens. Adv. Ther.20, 246–252 (2003).
  • Duggirala A, Joseph J, Sharma S, Nutheti R, Garg P, Das T. Activity of newer fluoroquinolones against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria isolated from ocular infections: an in vitro comparison. Indian J. Ophthalmol.55, 15–19 (2007).
  • Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD et al. Penetration of topically applied gatifloxacin 0.3%, moxifloxacin 0.5%, and ciprofloxacin 0.3% into the aqueous humor. Ophthalmology112, 446–449 (2005).
  • McCulley JP, Caudle D, Aranowicz JD, Shine WE. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolone penetration into the aqueous humor in humans. Ophthalmology113, 955–959 (2006).
  • Kim DH, Stark WJ, O’Brien TP, Dick JD. Aqueous penetration and biological activity of moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution and gatifloxacin 0.3% solution in cataract surgery patients. Ophthalmology112, 1992–1996 (2006).
  • Ong-Tone L. Aqueous humor penetration of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin eyedrops given by different methods before cataract surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.33, 59–62 (2007).
  • Costello P, Bakri S, Beer PM et al. Vitreous penetration of topical moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in humans. Retina26, 191–195 (2006).
  • Price MO, Price FW, Maclellan D. Effect of gatifloxacin 0.3% and moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solutions on human corneal epithelium following 2 dosing regimens. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 2137–2141 (2005).
  • Moshirfar M, Marx DP, Kumar R. The effect of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones on corneal reepithelialization after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea24, 833–836 (2005).
  • Kovoor TA, Kim AS, McCulley JP et al. Evaluation of the corneal effects of topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones using in vivo confocal microscopy. Eye Contact Lens30, 90–94 (2004).
  • Ly LT, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM. Confocal assessment of the effects of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones on the cornea. Eye Contact Lens32, 161–165 (2006).
  • Burka JM, Bower KS, Vonroekel RC, Stutzman RD, Kuzmovych CP, Howard RS. The effect of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin on epithelial healing following photorefractive keratectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.140, 83–87. (2005).
  • Herrygers LA, Noecker RJ, Lane LC, Levine JM. Comparison of corneal surface effects of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin using intensive and prolonged dosing protocols. Cornea24, 66–71 (2005).
  • Barequet IS, Habot-Wilner Z, Lavinsky F, Ziv H, Belkin M, Rosner M. Effect of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones on the healing rate of corneal erosions in an animal model. Cornea26, 606–609 (2007).
  • Price MO, Quillin C, Price FW. Effect of gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% on human corneal endothelial cell density and aqueous humor gatifloxacin concentration. Curr. Eye Res.30, 563–567 (2005).
  • Awwad ST, Haddad W, Wang MX, Parmar D, Conger D, Cavanagh HD. Corneal intrastromal gatifloxacin crystal deposits after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens30, 169–172 (2004).
  • Moshirfar M, Feiz V, Vitale AT, Wegelin JA, Basavanthappa S, Wolsey DH. Endophthalmitis after uncomplicated cataract surgery with the use of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: a retrospective observational case series. Ophthalmology114, 686–691 (2007).
  • Deramo VA, Lai JC, Fastenberg DM, Udell IR. Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. Am. J. Ophthalmol.142, 721–725 (2006).
  • Miller D, Flynn PM, Scott IU et al. In vitro fluoroquinolone resistance in staphylococcal endophthalmitis isolates. Arch. Ophthalmol.124, 479–483 (2006).
  • Hwang DG. Fluoroquinolone resistance in ophthalmology and the potential role for newer ophthalmic fluoroquinolones. Surv. Ophthalmol.49(Suppl. 2), S79–S83 (2004).
  • Butler MM, LaMarr WA, Foster KA et al. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of a novel aniliuracil-fluoroquinolone hybrid compound. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.51, 119–127 (2007).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.