Recent advances in female infertility assessment and treatment

References

• Evers JLH. Female subfertility. Lancet360, 151–159 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S, Pfeifer SM, Collins JA. Diagnosis and management of female infertility. JAMA290, 1767–1770 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copperman AB, DeCherney AH. Turn, turn, turn. Fertil. Steril.85, 12–13 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Fertility and ageing. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 261–276 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in infertility with age? A model assessment. Hum. Reprod.19, 1548–1553 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MAM, Killick SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity. Fertil. Steril.81, 384–392 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks DJ, Hay AWM. Smoking and female fecundity: the effect and importance of study design. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.112, 127–135 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Gillett WR. Prioritising for fertility treatments – should a high BMI exclude treatment? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 1107–1109 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Gillett WR, Putt T, Farquhar C. Prioritising for fertility treatments – the effect of excluding women with a high body mass index. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 1218–1221 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Klonoff-Cohen H. Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: what is known and unknown. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 180–204 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Nutrition and reproduction in women. Hum. Reprod. Update12, 193–207 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquali R, Gambineri A, Pagotto U. The impact of obesity on reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 1148–1159 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Gesink Law DC, Maclehose RF, Longnecker MP. Obesity and time to pregnancy. Hum. Reprod.22, 414–420 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balen AH, Platteau P, Andersen AN et al. The influence of body weight on response to ovulation induction with gonadotrophins in 335 women with World Health Organization group II anovulatory infertility. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 1195–1202 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Dodson WC, Kunselman AR, Legro RS. Association of obesity with treatment outcomes in ovulatory infertile women undergoing superovulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil. Steril.86, 642–646 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz M, Norman R. Diagnostic and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. A practical guide. Drugs66, 903–912 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran LJ, Brinkworth G, Noakes M, Norman RJ. Effects of lifestyle modification in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Reprod. Biomed. Online12, 569–578 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosens I, Gordts S, Valkenburg M, Puttemans P, Campo R, Gordts S. Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility? Hum. Reprod.19, 1689–1692 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum. Reprod.20, 1144–1147 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Hompes PGA, Eijkemans MJC, van der Veen F, Mol BW. Investigation of the infertile couple: a basic fertility work-up performed within 12 months of trying to conceive generates costs and complications for no particular benefit. Hum. Reprod.20, 2672–2674 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunault CC, Laven JSE, van Rooij IAJ, Eijkemans JC, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF. Prospective validation of two models predicting pregnancy leading to live birth among untreated subfertile couples. Hum. Reprod.20, 1636–1641 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• den Hartog JE, Morré SA, Land JA. Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor infertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening. Hum. Reprod. Update12, 719–730 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltz MD, Gera PS, Moustakis M. Chlamydia serology screening in infertility patients. Fertil. Steril.85, 752–754 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update12, 685–718 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Fowler P, Bhattacharya S. Assessment of ovarian reserve – should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum. Reprod.21, 2729–2735 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou S, Bourdrez P, Varma R, Afnan M, Mol BWJ, Coomarasamy A. Tubal evaluation in the investigation of subfertility: a structured comparison of tests. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.111, 1313–1321 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mol BWJ, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Comparison of hsyterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum. Reprod.14, 1237–1242 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanahatoe SJ, Hompes PGA, Lambalk CB. Investigation of the infertile couple: should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed in the infertility work up programme in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination? Hum. Reprod.18, 8–11 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baramki TA. Hysterosalpingography. Fertil. Steril.83, 1595–1606 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Lilford R, Harada T, Hughes E. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), CD003718 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fadhli R, Sylvestre C, Buckett W, Tulandi T. A randomized study of laparoscopic chromopertubation with lipiodol versus saline in infertile women. Fertil. Steril.85, 505–507 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordts S, Puttemans P, Gordts SY, Brosens I, Campo R. Transvaginal laparoscopy. Best. Prac. Res. Clin. Obst. Gynaecol.19, 757–767 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watrelot A, Nisolle M, Chelli H, Hocke C, Rongières C, Racinet C. Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiliscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Hum. Reprod.18, 834–839 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimbach S, Bastert G, Wallwiener D. Technical results of falloposcopy for infertility diagnosis in a large multicentre study. Hum. Reprod.16, 925–930 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes EG, Giacomini M. Funding in vitro fertilization treatment for persistent subfertility: the pain and the politics. Fertil. Steril.76, 431–442 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain T, Hornstein MD. Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertil. Steril.84, 221–223 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwalisz B, McVeigh E, Hope T, Kennedy S. Prioritizing IVF patients according to the number of existing children – a proposed refinement to the current guideline. Hum. Reprod.21, 1110–1112 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy R, Kingsland C, Rutherford A, Hamilton M, Ledger W. Implementation of the NICE guideline – recommendations from the British Fertility Society for national criteria for NHS funding of assisted conception. Hum. Fertil.9, 181–189 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowell P, Braude P. Assisted conception. I – general principles. Br. Med. J.327, 799–801 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braude P, Rowell P. Assisted conception. II – in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Br. Med. J.327, 852–855 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braude P, Rowell P. Assisted conception. III - problems with assisted conception. Br. Med. J.327, 920–923 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickering S, Braude P. Further advances and uses of assisted conception technology. Br. Med. J.327, 1156–1158 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BCJM. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr. Rev.27, 170–207 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis BJ. In vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.356, 379–386, (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum. Reprod.21, 1680–1697 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, te Velde E, Heineman MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4), CD001838 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Messinis IE. Ovulation induction: a mini review. Hum. Reprod.20, 2688–2697 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Santbrink EJP, Eijkemans MJ, Laven JSE, Fauser BCJM. Patient-tailored conventional ovulation induction algorithms in anovulatory infertility. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.16, 381–389 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycyctic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum. Reprod.19, 41–47 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer H, Casper R, Tulandi T. A new era in ovulation induction. Fertil. Steril.85, 277–284 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro RS, Barnhart HX, Schlaff WD et al. Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.356, 551–566 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert TI, Kruger TF, Steyn DW, Nosarka S. Is the addition of metformin efficacious in the treatment of clomiphene citrate-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome? A structured literature review. Fertil. Steril.86, 1432–1437 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello MF, Chapman M, Conway U. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on metformin co-administration during gonadotrophin ovulation induction or IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum. Reprod.21, 1387–1399 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar C, Lilford RJ, Marjoribanks J, Vandekerckhove P. Laparoscopic “drilling” by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD001122 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hugues JN, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Howles CM, on behalf of the Recombinant FSH OI Study Group. The use of a decremental dose regimen in patients treated with a chronic low-dose step-up protocol for WHO Group II anovulation: a prospective randomized multicentre study. Hum. Reprod.21, 2817–2822 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordts S, Campo R, Brosens I, Puttemans P. Endometriosis: modern surgical management to improve fertility. Best Prac. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.17, 275–287 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnez J, Pirard C, Smets M, Jadoul P, Squifflet J. Surgical management of endometriosis. Best Prac. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.18, 329–348 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson TZ, Barlow DH, Koninckx PR, Olive D, Farquhar C. Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4), CD001398 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility. Fertil. Steril.81, 1441–1446 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Agarwal A, Agarwal R, Loret de Mola JR. Impact of ovarian endometrioma on assisted reproduction outcomes. Reprod. Biomed. Online13, 349–360 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W, Garry R. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD004992 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• D’Hooghe TM, Denys B, Spiessens C, Meuleman C, Debrock S. Is the endometriosis recurrence rate increased after ovarian hyperstimulation? Fertil. Steril.86, 283–290 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett WR. Evaluation of long term outcome following tubal microsurgery. Ass. Reprod. Rev.8, 140–151 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D’Angelo A, Gillett W. In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastamosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD004144 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Gomel V, McComb PF. Microsurgery for tubal infertility. J. Reprod. Med.51, 177–184 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson NP, Mak W, Sowter MC. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD002125 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.56, 483–491 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol. Endocrinol.22, 106–109 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf Y, Ross C, El-Toukhy T, Hart R, Seed P, Braude P. The effect of small intramural uterine fibroids on the cumulative outcome of assisted conception. Hum. Reprod.21, 2640–2644 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths A, D’Angelo A, Amso N. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD003857 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar C, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Vail A, Wiseman D. Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), CD000475 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Metwally M, Watson A, Lilford R, Vandekerckhove P. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), CD001298 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. Br. Med. J.321, 1259–1262 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Dunson DB, McConnaughey DR, Kesner JS, Weinberg CR. On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences. Hum. Reprod.19, 1539–2543 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Opinion: natural family planning and the management of infertility. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.267, 67–71 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum. Reprod.18, 1959–1966 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes E, Collins J, Vandekerchove P. Clomiphene citrate for unexplained subfertility in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD000057 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi A, Pejovic T, Nezhat F. Induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature. Fertil. Steril.85, 819–826 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Vale L, Templeton A. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), CD003357 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P. IVF results: optimize not maximize. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.194, 322–331 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen M, Kuinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.346, 725–730 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson CK, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Romitti PA et al.In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil. Steril.84, 1308–1315 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan BK, Vandekerckhove P, Kennedy R, Keay SD. Investigation and current management of recurrent IVF treatment failure in the UK. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112, 773–780 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Jurema MW, Nogueira D. In vitro maturation of human oocytes for assisted reproduction. Fertil. Steril.86, 1277–1291 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahine LK, Cedars MI. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy. Fertil. Steril.85, 51–56 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann CG, Morris DG, Sreenan JM, Leese HJ. The quiet embryo hypothesis: molecular characteristics favoring viability. Mol. Reprod. Dev. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20604 (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar