Paternal genetic and epigenetic influences on IVF outcome

References

• Van Voorhis BJ. Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.356, 379–386 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Results. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum. Reprod. Update10, 19–28 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo GD, Neri QV, Hariprashad JJ et al. ICSI and its outcome. Semin. Reprod. Med.18, 161–169 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olson CK, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Romitti PA et al.In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil. Steril.84, 1308–1315 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet. Gynecol.106, 1039–1045 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Meikle SF et al. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. JAMA282, 1832–1838 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Albisua I, Borell-Kost S, Mau-Holzmann UA, Licht P, Krageloh-Mann I. Increased frequency of severe major anomalies in children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.49, 129–134 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Gross S et al. Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J. Med. Genet.42, 289–291 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang AS, Moley KH, Wangler M, Feinberg AP, Debaun MR. Association between Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproductive technology: a case series of 19 patients. Fertil. Steril.83, 349–354 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox GF, Burger J, Lip V et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet.71, 162–164 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure AK, Aknin-Seifer, I, Frerot, G et al. Predictive factors for an increased risk of sperm aneuploidies in oligo-astheno-teratozoospermic males. Int. J. Androl.30, 153–162 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aittomaki K, Wennerholm UB, Bergh C et al. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information. Hum. Reprod.19, 472–476 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliston S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): risks reconsidered. Hum. Fertil. (Camb.)3, 31–35 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levron J, Aviram-Goldring A, Madgar I et al. Studies on sperm chromosomes in patients with severe male factor infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.183(Suppl. 1), S23–S28 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Carrell DT. Contributions of sperm to embryogenesis: the use of laboratory assays to evaluate the genetic and epigenetic fitness of sperm. Reprod. Biomed. Online (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Topping D, Brown P, Hassold T. The immunocytogenetics of human male meiosis. In: The Genetics of Male Infertility. Carrell DT (Ed.).115–128. Humana Press, Inc., NJ, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lamb NE, Sherma, SL, Hassold TJ. Effect of meiotic recombination on the production of aneuploid gametes in humans. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 250–255 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet.2, 280–291 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RH. Mechanisms of nondisjunction in human spermatogenesis. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 245–249 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RH. Meiotic chromosome abnormalities in human spermatogenesis. Reprod. Toxicol.22, 142–147 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves J, Sun F, Schlegal P et al. Defective recombination in infertile men. Hum. Mol. Genet.13, 2875–2883 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun F, Greene C, Turek PJ et al. Immunofluorescent synaptonemal complex analysis in azoospermic men. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, DOI:10.1159/000086913 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Topping D, Brown P, Judis L et al. Synaptic defects at meiosis I and non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod.21, 3171–3177 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codina-Pascual M, Campillo M, Kraus J et al. Crossover frequency and synaptonemal complex length: their variability and effects on human male meiosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod.12, 123–133 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrello N, Vicari E, Calogero AE Chromosome abnormalities in spermatozoa of patients with azoospermia and normal somatic karyotype. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 363–365 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Martin RH. The clinical relevance of sperm aneuploidy. In: The Genetics of Male Infertility. Carrell DT (Ed.). Humana Press, Inc., NJ, USA, 129–144 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kruse R, Guttenbach M, Shartmann B et al. Genetic counselling in a patient with XXY/XXXY/XY mosaic Klinefelter’s syndrome: estimate of sex chromosome aberrations in sperm before intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril.69, 432–485 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Lim A, Fong Y, Yu S. Estimates of sperm sex chromosome disomy and diploidy rates in a 47,XXY/46,XY mosaic Klinefelter patient. Hum. Genet.104, 405–409 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rives N, Joly G, Machy A et al. Assessment of sex chromosome aneuploidy in sperm nuclei from 47,XXY and 46,XY/47,XXY males: comparison with fertile and infertile males with normal karyotype. Mol. Hum. Reprod.6, 107–112 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogur G, Van Assche E, Vegetti W et al. Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers. Mol. Hum. Reprod.12, 209–215 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryndman N, Romana S, Le Lorc’h M et al. Assisting reproduction of infertile men carrying a Robertsonian translocation. Hum. Reprod.16, 2274–2277 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin R, Spriggs E. Sperm chromosome complements in a man heterozygous for a reciprocal translocation 46,XY,t(9;13)(q21.1;q21.2) and a review of the literature. Clin. Genet.47, 42–46 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrell DT, Wilcox AL, Lowy L et al. Elevated sperm chromosome aneuploidy and apoptosis in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstet. Gynecol.101, 1229–1235 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzacken B, Gavelle FM, Martin-Pont B et al. Familial sperm polyploidy induced by genetic spermatogenesis failure: case report. Hum. Reprod.16, 2646–2651 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devillard F, Metzler-Guillemain C, Pelletier R et al. Polyploidy in large-headed sperm: FISH study of three cases. Hum. Reprod.17, 1292–1298 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell DT. The clinical implementation of sperm aneuploidy testing: pitfalls and promises. J. Androl.29, 124–133 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP Sperm and blastomere aneuploidy detection in reproductive genetics and medicine. J. Histochem. Cytochem.53, 261–267 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagvenkar P, Zaveri K, Hinduja I. Comparison of the sperm aneuploidy rate in severe oligozoospermic and oligozoospermic men and its relation to intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil. Steril.84, 925–931 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco J, Gabau E, Gomez D et al. Chromosome 21 disomy in the spermatozoa of the fathers of children with trisomy 21, in a population with a high prevalence of Down syndrome: increased incidence in cases of paternal origin. Am. J. Hum. Genet.63, 1067–1072 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell DT, Wilcox AL, Udoff LC, Thorp C, Campbell B. Chromosome 15 aneuploidy in the sperm and conceptus of a sibling with variable familial expression of round-headed sperm syndrome. Fertil. Steril.76, 1258–1260 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit FM, Frydman N, Benkhalifa M et al. Could sperm aneuploidy rate determination be used as a predictive test before intracytoplasmic sperm injection? J. Androl.26, 235–241 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrell DT, Emery BR. Use of automated imaging and analysis technology for the detection of aneuploidy in human sperm. Fertil. Steril.11 (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Perry MJ, Chen X, Lu X. Automated scoring of multiprobe FISH in human spermatozoa. Cytometry A.71, 968–972 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers. Hum. Reprod.17, 3201–3207 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Analysis of chromosome segregation during preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both male and female translocation heterozygotes. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 305–309 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.183(Suppl. 1), S55–S58 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Huang J, Liu P, Qiao J. Analysis of meiotic segregation patterns and interchromosomal effects in sperm from six males with Robertsonian translocations. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wiland E, Midro AT, Panasiuk B, Kurpisz M. The analysis of meiotic segregation patterns and aneuploidy in the spermatozoa of father and son with translocation t(4;5)(p15.1;p12) and the prediction of the individual probability rate for unbalanced progeny at birth. J. Androl.28, 262–272 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarroll SA, Altshuler DM. Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nat. Genet.39, S37–S42 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JL, Perry GH, Feuk L et al. Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res.16, 949–961 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature444, 444–454 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupski JR. Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease. Nature39, S43–S47 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• McLay DW, Clarke HJ. Remodelling the paternal chromatin at fertilization in mammals. Reproduction125, 625–633 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J. Androl.8, 11–29 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki VW, Moskovtsev SI, Willis J et al. DNA integrity is compromised in protamine-deficient human sperm. J. Androl.26, 741–748 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muratori M, Marchiani S, Maggi M, Forti G, Baldi E. Origin and biological significance of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Front. Biosci.11, 1491–1499 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. Sperm DNA damage assessment: a test whose time has come. Fertil. Steril.84, 850–853 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesi DE, Feng HL. Sperm DNA integrity from sperm to egg. J. Androl.28, 481–489 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Flamigni C, Borini A. Clinical relevance of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed. Online14, 746–757 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen B, Koutlaki N, Youssry M, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. DNA damage of human spermatozoa in assisted reproduction: origins, diagnosis, impacts and safety. Reprod. Biomed. Online14, 384–395 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebesoy FB, Aydos K, Unlu C. Effect of sperm chromatin damage on fertilization ratio and embryo quality post-ICSI. Arch. Androl.52, 397–402 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr-Esfahani MH, Salehi M, Razavi S et al. Effect of sperm DNA damage and sperm protamine deficiency on fertilization and embryo development post-ICSI. Reprod. Biomed. Online11, 198–205 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zini A, Meriano J, Kader K et al. Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI. Hum. Reprod.20, 3476–3480 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MH, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li SH et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil. Steril. (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil. Steril. (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C. Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum. Reprod.19, 611–615 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden RG, Feinberg AP. Genetics and epigenetics – nature’s pen-and-pencil set. N. Engl. J. Med.356, 731–733 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery BR, Carrell DT. The effect of epigenetic sperm abnormalities on early embryogenesis. Asian J. Androl.8, 131–142 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manandhar G, Schatten H, Sutovsky P. Centrosome reduction during gametogenesis and its significance. Biol. Reprod.72, 2–13 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev. Biol.165, 299–335 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo G, Munne S, Cohen J. The human zygote inherits its mitotic potential from the male gamete. Hum. Reprod.9, 1220–1225 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J, Davis P. Evolution of the sperm aster after microinjection of isolated human sperm centrosomes into meiotically mature human oocytes. Hum. Reprod.10, 2179–2182 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sathananthan AH, Ratnam SS, Ng SC et al. The sperm centriole: its inheritance, replication and perpetuation in early human embryos. Hum. Reprod.11, 345–356 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathananthan AH. Mitosis in the human embryo: the vital role of the sperm centrosome (centriole). Histol. Histopathol.12, 827–856 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sathananthan AH, Ratnasooriya WD, de Silva PK, Menezes J. Characterization of human gamete centrosomes for assisted reproduction. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol.106, 61–73 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moomjy M, Colombero LT, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. Sperm integrity is critical for normal mitotic division and early embryonic development. Mol. Hum. Reprod.5, 836–844 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawe VY, Terada Y, Nakamura S et al. A pathology of the sperm centriole responsible for defective sperm aster formation, syngamy and cleavage. Hum. Reprod.17, 2344–2349 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzimeletiou K, Rutherford AJ, Griffin DK, Handyside AH. Is the sperm centrosome to blame for the complex polyploid chromosome patterns observed in cleavage stage embryos from an OAT patient? Zygote15, 81–90 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rybouchkin A, Dozortsev D, Pelinck MJ, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Analysis of the oocyte activating capacity and chromosomal complement of round-headed human spermatozoa by their injection into mouse oocytes. Hum. Reprod.11, 2170–2175 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Hum. Reprod.17, 184–189 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada Y. Human sperm centrosomal function during fertilization, a novel assessment for male sterility. Hum. Cell.17, 181–186 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terada, Y Functional analyses of the sperm centrosome in human reproduction: implications for assisted reproductive technique. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl.63, 507–513 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terada Y, Nakamura S, Morita J et al. Use of Mammalian eggs for assessment of human sperm function: molecular and cellular analyses of fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol.51, 290–293 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura S, Terada Y, Horiuchi T et al. Analysis of the human sperm centrosomal function and the oocyte activation ability in a case of globozoospermia, by ICSI into bovine oocytes. Hum. Reprod.17, 2930–2934 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitson L, Simerly C, Schatten G. Inheritance defects of the sperm centrosome in humans and its possible role in male infertility. Int. J. Androl.20(Suppl. 3), 35–43 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terada Y, Nakamura S, Simerly C et al. Centrosomal function assessment in human sperm using heterologous ICSI with rabbit eggs: a new male factor infertility assay. Mol. Reprod. Dev.67, 360–365 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Terada Y, Rawe VY et al. A trial to restore defective human sperm centrosomal function. Hum. Reprod.20, 1933–1937 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann K, Steger K. Epigenetics in male germ cells. J. Androl.28, 466–480 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum. Reprod. Update12, 417–435 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward WS, Coffey DS. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells. Biol. Reprod.44, 569–574 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell DT, Emery BR, Hammoud S. Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum. Reprod. Update.13, 313–327 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell D, Liu L. Altered protamine 2 expression is uncommon in donors of known fertility, but common among men with poor fertilizing capacity, and may reflect other abnormalities of spermiogenesis. J. Androl.22, 604–610 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki VW, Moskovtsev S, Willis J et al. DNA integrity is compromised in protamine-deficient sperm. J. Androl.26, 741–748 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoki VW, Liu L, Jones KP et al. Sperm protamine 1/protamine 2 ratios are related to in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and predictive of fertilization ability. Fertil. Steril.86, 1408–1415 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet.3, 662–673 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature447, 425–432 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaval K, Govin J, Cerqueira, F et al. Differential histone modifications mark mouse imprinting control regions during spermatogenesis. Embo. J.26, 720–729 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zini A, Gabriel MS, Zhang X. The histone to protamine ratio in human spermatozoa: comparative study of whole and processed semen. Fertil. Steril.87, 217–219 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science293, 1089–1093 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes CC, La Salle S, Smiraglia DJ, Robaire B, Trasler JM. A unique configuration of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in the testis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 228–233 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet.39, 457–466 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer CB, Ooi SK, Bestor TH, Bourc’his D. Epigenetic decisions in mammalian germ cells. Science316, 398–399 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen C, Reardon W. Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG112, 1589–1594 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li T, Vu TH, Ulaner GA et al. IVF results in de novo DNA methylation and histone methylation at an Igf2-H19 imprinting epigenetic switch. Mol. Hum. Reprod.11, 631–640 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng T, Kuang Y, Zhang D et al. Disruption of imprinting and aberrant embryo development in completely inbred embryonic stem cell-derived mice. Dev. Growth Differ. (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitalipov SM. Genomic imprinting in primate embryos and embryonic stem cells. Reprod. Fertil. Dev.18, 817–821 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawetz SA. Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges. Nature Review Genetics6, 633–642 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerke A, Dieleman SJ, Gadella BM. A possible role for sperm RNA in early embryo development. Theriogenology (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Martins RP, Krawetz SA. RNA in human sperm. Asian J. Androl.7, 115–120 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ostermeier GC, Goodrich RJ, Diamond MP, Dix DJ, Krawetz SA. Toward using stable spermatozoal RNAs for prognostic assessment of male factor fertility. Fertil. Steril.83, 1687–1694 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA. The controversy, potential and roles of spermatozoal RNA. Trends Mol. Med.11, 156–163 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D, Ostermeier GC. Towards a better understanding of RNA carriage by ejaculate spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. Update.12, 757–767 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D, Ostermeier GC. Spermatozoal RNA: Why is it there and what does it do? Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.34, 840–846 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platts AE, Dix DJ, Chemes HE et al. Success and failure in human spermatogenesis revealed by teratozoospermic RNAs. Hum. Mol. Genet.16, 763–773 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki VW, Liu L, Carrell DT. A novel mechanism of protamine expression deregulation highlighted by abnormal protamine transcript retention in infertile human males with sperm protamine deficiency. Mol. Hum. Reprod.12, 41–50 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermeier GC, Miller D, Huntriss JD, Diamond M, Krawetz SA. Delivering spermatozoon RNA to the oocyte. Nature429, 154 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rassoulzadegan M, Grandjean V, Gounon P et al. RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse. Nature441, 469–474 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard A, Sachidanandam R, Hannon GJ, Carmell MA. A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins. Nature442, 199–202 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim VN. Small RNAs just got bigger: Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) in mammalian testes. Genes. Dev.20, 1993–1997 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivna ST, Beyret E, Wang Z, Lin H. A novel class of small RNAs in mouse spermatogenic cells. Genes. Dev.20, 1709–1714 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanai M, Brahmajosyula M, Perry AC. A restricted role for sperm-borne microRNAs in mammalian fertilization. Biol. Reprod.75, 877–884 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckett WM, Chian RC, Holzer H et al. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstet. Gynecol.110, 885–891 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Pardalidis N et al. Genetic and epigenetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Asian J. Androl.8, 643–673 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell DT. The clinical implementation of sperm chromosome aneuploidy testing: pitfalls and promises. J. Androl.29(2), 124–133(2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shafik A, Shafik AA, Shafik I, El Sibai O. Sperm DNA fragmentation. Arch. Androl.52, 197–208 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod. Biomed. Online14, 727–733 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezo YJ. Paternal and maternal factors in preimplantation embryogenesis: interaction with the biochemical environment. Reprod. Biomed. Online12, 616–621 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremellen K, Miari G, Froiland D, Thompson J. A randomised control trial examining the effect of an antioxidant (Menevit) on pregnancy outcome during IVF-ICSI treatment. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol.47, 216–221 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards TM, Myers JP. Environmental exposures and gene regulation in disease etiology. Environ. Health Perspect.115, 1264–1270 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings AM, Kavlock RJ. Gene-environment interactions: a review of effects on reproduction and development. Crit. Rev. Toxicol.34, 461–485 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HW Jr. IVF: past and future. Reprod. Biomed. Online6, 375–381 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentley DR. Whole-genome re-sequencing. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.16, 545–552 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle MA, Clarke SC. Pyrosequencing: sequence typing at the speed of light. Mol. Biotechnol.28, 129–137 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Lee KH. Genomics and proteomics in process development: opportunities and challenges. Trends Biotechnol.25, 324–330 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krausz E. High-content siRNA screening. Mol. Biosyst.3, 232–240 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richiardi L, Pettersson A, Akre O. Genetic and environmental risk factors for testicular cancer. Int. J. Androl.30, 230–240 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talmud PJ. Gene-environment interaction and its impact on coronary heart disease risk. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.17, 148–152 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H et al. How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reprod. Biomed. Online12, 634–638 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszar G, Ozkavukcu S, Jakab A et al. Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.18, 260–267 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aktan TM, Montag M, Duman S et al. Use of a laser to detect viable but immotile spermatozoa. Andrologia36, 366–369 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar