Metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media to predict IVF outcome

References

• Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Variability in the difficulties experienced by women undergoing infertility treatments. Fertil. Steril.83, 275–283 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher W, Pratt W. Fecundity and infertility in the United States 1965–88. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 192. Hyattsville, MD, USA. National Center for Health Statistics. 4 December 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Assisted reproductive technology success rates. 2005 National summary and fertility clinic reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. World report on ART (assisted reproductive technology). Prague, Czech Republic (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Wright VJC, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2003. MMWR Surveill. Summ.55, 1–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet. Gynecol.109, 967–977 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalevsky G, Patrizio P. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States. Fertil. Steril.84, 325–330 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K et al. Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles. Hum. Reprod.18, 1313–1318 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner JP, Veeck LL, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ. Predictive value of pregnancy during original in vitro fertilization cycle on implantation and pregnancy in subsequent cryothaw cycles. Fertil. Steril.56, 505–508 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet2, 366 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounson AO, Leeton JF, Wood C, Webb J, Wood J. Pregnancies in humans by fertilization in vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycle. Science212, 681–682 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J et al. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J. In vitro Fert. Embryo Transf.1, 3–23 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod.13, 1003–1013 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum. Reprod.14, 1318–1323 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veeck L. An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses: an Illustrated Reference for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Veeck L (Ed.). Parthenon Publishing, NY, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod.14, 2581–2587 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.14, 2345–2349 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. IN: Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Jansen R, Mortimer D (Eds). Parthenon Publishing, Lancashire, UK, 378–388 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Toner JP. Progress we can be proud of: US trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years. Fertil. Steril.78, 943–950 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakkas D, Gardner DK. Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.17, 283–288 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggers JD, Whittingham DG, Donahue RP. The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oocyte and zygote. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA58, 560–567 (1967).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaghan J, Handyside AH, Winston RM, Leese HJ. Effects of pyruvate and glucose on the development of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil.99, 87–95 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy K, Hooper MA, Handyside AH, Rutherford AJ, Winston RM, Leese HJ. Non-invasive measurement of glucose and pyruvate uptake by individual human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod.4, 188–191 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gott AL, Hardy K, Winston RM, Leese HJ. Non-invasive measurement of pyruvate and glucose uptake and lactate production by single human preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod.5, 104–108 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaghan J, Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM, Leese HJ. Selection criteria for human embryo transfer: a comparison of pyruvate uptake and morphology. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.10, 21–30 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner K, Martin KL, Woodward BJ, Lenton EA, Leese HJ. Comparison of pyruvate uptake by embryos derived from conception and non-conception natural cycles. Hum. Reprod.9, 2362–2366 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil. Steril.76, 1175–1180 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devreker F. Uptake and release of metabolites in human preimplantation embryos. In: Human Preimplantation Embryo Selection. Cohen J, Elder K (Eds). Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 325–336 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Leese HJ. Assessment of embryo viability prior to transfer by the noninvasive measurement of glucose uptake. J. Exp. Zool.242, 103–105 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones GM, Trounson AO, Vella PJ, Thouas GA, Lolatgis N, Wood C. Glucose metabolism of human morula and blastocyst-stage embryos and its relationship to viability after transfer. Reprod. Biomed. Online3, 124–132 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane M, Gardner DK. Amino acids and vitamins prevent culture-induced metabolic perturbations and associated loss of viability of mouse blastocysts. Hum. Reprod.13, 991–997 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton FD, Hawkhead JA, Humpherson PG et al. Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Hum. Reprod.17, 999–1005 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brison DR, Houghton FD, Falconer D et al. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum. Reprod.19, 2319–2324 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli E, Botros L, Sakkas D, Burns DH. Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using H NMR correlates with pregnancy outcome. Presented at: 55th Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation. San Diego, CA, USA, 26–29 March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Seli E, Sakkas D, Scott R, Kwok SC, Rosendahl SM, Burns DH. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril.88, 1350–1357 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis DI, Goodacre R. Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst131, 875–885 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollywood K, Brison DR, Goodacre R. Metabolomics: current technologies and future trends. Proteomics6, 4716–4723 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldiges M, Lutz S, Pflug S, Schroer K, Stein N, Wiendahl C. Metabolomics: current state and evolving methodologies and tools. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.76, 495–511 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brison DR, Hollywood K, Arnesen R, Goodacre R. Predicting human embryo viability: the road to non-invasive analysis of the secretome using metabolic footprinting. Reprod. Biomed. Online15, 296–302 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil. Steril.86, 678–685 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott R, Seli E, Miller K, Sakkas D, Scott K, Burns DH. Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using Raman spectroscopy predicts embryonic reproductive potential: a prospective blinded pilot study. Fertil. Steril. PMID: 18281045 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Kato O, Terramoto S, Morita H, Botros L, Roos P, Burns DH. Metabolomic assessment of day 2 embryos based on pregnacy outcome after single embryo transfer (SET). Presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Washington, DC, USA, 13–17 October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vergouw CG, Lambalk CB, Lens J, Botros L, Roos P, Burns DH. Non-invasive method for embryo selection in single embryo transfer (SET) using metabolomic profiling (MetPro) of oxidative metabolism (OM). Presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Washington, DC, USA, 13–17 October 2007.
   Google Scholar