Arguments against elective single-embryo transfer

References

• Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuk M et al. Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1997. JAMA283, 335–341 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauser BC, Devroey P, Macklon NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet365, 1807–1816 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones Jr HW. Iatrogenic multiple births: a 2003 checkup. Fertil. Steril.87, 453–455 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Oleske DM, Tur Kaspa I, Vidali A, Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. N. Engl. J. Med.343, 2–7 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Taylor AN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Rye BH, Pyrzak R. Risk factors for high-order multiple pregnancy and multiple birth after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: results of 4,062 intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil. Steril.83, 671–683 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP. A year of inaction on high-order multiple pregnancies due to ovulation induction. Fertil. Steril.79, 14–16 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner JP. Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years. Fertil. Steril.78, 943–950 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology. A rebuttal. Hum. Reprod.18, 1765–1766 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.339, 573–577 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil. Steril.82, 773–774 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones Jr HW. Multiple births: how are we doing? Fertil. Steril.79, 17–21 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardis N, Maruthini D, Balen AH. Modes of conception and multiple pregnancy: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Fertil. Steril.84, 1727–1732 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitinen A, Unkila-Kallio L, Halttunen M, Hyden-Granskog C. Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate. Hum. Reprod.18, 1449–1453 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Lindmark G. Maternal morbidity an mortality associated with multiple gestations. Obstet. Gynecol.95, 899–904 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Martens G, De Sutter P et al. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF assisted reproduction: a cohort study. Hum. Reprod.21, 1025–1032 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seoud MA, Toner JP, Kruithoff C, Muasher SJ. Outcome of twin, triplet and quadruplet in vitro fertilization pregnancies: the Norfolk experience. Fertil. Steril.57, 825–834 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 575–593 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetrics and pediatric outcome and cost–effectiveness analysis. Hum. Reprod.21, 210–216 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neubourg D, Gerris J. What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go? Hum. Reprod.21, 843–846 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlström PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden – impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum. Reprod.22, 2202–2207 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman B, Ali R, Rangarajan S. Towards the elective replacement of a single embryo (eSET) in the United Kingdom. Hum. Fertil. (Camb.)10, 123–127 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gleicher N, Barad D. Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility. Fertil. Steril. PMID: 18439598 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Campbell DP, Chan CL et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum. Reprod.10, 1079–1084 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GL, Zhang SH, Fokras A, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil. Steril.81, 500–504 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton CR, McBride J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Power S. Factors affecting patients’ attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.87, 269–278 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman RJ. A 47-year old woman with fertility problems who desires a multiple pregnancy. JAMA297, 858–867 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotland GS, McNamee P, Peddie VL, Bhattacharaya S. Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women’s preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilization. BJOG114, 977–983 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan TL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Greene MF, Crowley Jr WF. The economic impact of multiple gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques on their incidence. N. Engl. J. Med.331, 244–249 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzler WL, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Medical and economic effects of twin gestation. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig.7, 321–327 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koivurova S, Hartikainen A-L, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Järvelin M-J. Post-neonatal hospitalization and health care costs among IVF children: a 7-year follow-up study. Hum. Reprod.22, 2136–2141 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Bigger HR, Leurgans S, Sietsema D. The cost of prematurity: a case–control study of twins vs singletons. Am. J. Public Health86, 809–814 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Gaag N, De Jong AH. Population scenarios for the European union: regional scenarios. Maandstat. Bevolking45, 17–31 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoorens S, Gallo F, Cave JAK, Grant JC. Can assisted reproductive technologies help offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK. Hum. Reprod.22, 2471–2475 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N. Strategies to improve insurance coverage for infertility services. Fertil. Steril.70, 1006–1008 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain T, Hornstein MD. Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertil. Steril.84, 221–223 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad A. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA. Hum. Reprod.21, 1945–1950 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data. Fertil. Steril.87, 1301–1305 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saideen P, Sunderström P. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment? Hum. Reprod.19, 1046–1048 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil. Steril.88, 354–360 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Barad D. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.21, 1337–1344 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wely M, Twisk M, Mol BW, van der Veen F. Is twin pregnancy necessarily and adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum. Reprod.21, 2736–2738 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belaisch-Allart J. Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum. Reprod.22, 1495 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Preimplantation genetic screening: “established” and ready for prime time? Fertil. Steril.89(4), 780–788 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J et al.In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 9–17 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar