Ultrasound parameters in the prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment

References

• Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil. Steril.1, 3–25 (1950).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lédéé-Bataille N, Laprée-Delage G, Taupin JL, Dubanchet S, Frydman R, Chaouat G. Concentration of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in uterine flushing fluid is highly predictive of embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod.17, 213–218 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities Hum. Reprod. Update13, 77–86 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abulafia O, Sherer DM. Angiogenesis of the ovary. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.182, 240–246 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SK. Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.12, 147–151 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Risalvato A, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Clinical applications of color Doppler energy imaging in the female reproductive tract and pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update5, 515–529 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon BJ, Carati CJ, Verco CJ. Endometrial perfusion across the normal human menstrual cycle assessed by laser Doppler fluxmetry. Hum. Reprod.12, 132–139 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Jinno M, Ozaki T, Iwashita M, Nakamura Y, Kudo A, Hirano H. Measurement of endometrial tissue blood flow: a novel way to assess uterine receptivity for implantation. Fertil. Steril.76, 1168–1174 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandorfer SD, Arrendondo-Soberon F, Loret de Mola JR, Feinberg RF. Reliability of intraobserver and interobserver sonographic endometrial stripe thickness measurements. Fertil. Steril.70, 152–154 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Schnitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider HPG. Prospective evaulation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil. Steril.73, 106–113 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull LW, Lesny P, Killick SR. Assessment of uterine receptivity prior to embryo transfer: a review of currently available imaging modalities. Hum. Reprod. Update1, 505–514 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum. Reprod. Update2, 323–335 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B, Porter R, Ahuja K, Craft I. Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf.1, 233–238 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glissant A, de Mouzon J, Frydman R. Ultrasound study of the endometrium during in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil. Steril.44, 786–790 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf.7, 146–152 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonen Y, Calderon M, Direnfeld M, Abramovici H. The impact of sonographic assessment of the endometrium and meticulous hormonal monitoring during natural cycles in patients with failed donor artificial insemination. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.1, 122–126 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström P. Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum. Reprod.13, 1550–1552 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum estradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum. Reprod.12, 2271–2275 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper R. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil. Steril.71, 147–149 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Bekavac I, Bjelos D, Kurjak A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J. Ultrasound Med.20, 125–134 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild RL, Knoblock C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, Hansmann M. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil. Steril.75, 361–366 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum. Reprod.7, 418–421 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, Nazari A, Lurie D. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.77, 781–786 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher G, Herbert C, Maassarani, G, Jacobs MH. Assessment of the late proliferative phase endometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Hum. Reprod.6, 232–237 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G. Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program. A preliminary study. Fertil. Steril.74, 797–801 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during in-vitro fertilization using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.26, 765–769 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum. Reprod.21, 164–170 (2006b).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raga R, Bonilla-Musoles F, Casan EM, Klein O, Bonilla F. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum. Reprod.14, 2851–2854 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercè LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, Troyano J. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome? Fertil. Steril.1, 111–117 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dickey RP. Doppler ultrasound investigation of uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertility and early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update3, 467–503 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswamy RK, Williams G, Steptoe PC. Decreased uterine perfusion a cause of infertility. Hum. Reprod.3, 955–959 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzik K, Grab D, Sasse V, Hutter W, Rosenbusch B, Terinde R. Doppler sonographic findings and their correlation with implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil. Steril.52, 825–828 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer CV, Campbell S, Tan SL et al. The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.57, 372–376 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Soenksen DM, Britten S. Ultrasongraphic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil. Steril.62, 1004–1010 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini P, Batzofin J, Nelson J, Olive D. Sonographic uterine predictors of pregnancy in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproductive treatments. Fertil. Steril.62, 815–822 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flow during stimulated and natural cycles. Fertil. Steril.85, 721–727 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Uterine and ovarian perfusion during periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil. Steril.60, 439–443 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pittrof FR, Tan SL. Endometrial thickness morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an IVF program. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.6, 191–198 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval Y, Lipitz S, Dor J, Achiron R. The relationship between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod.14, 1067–1071 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia C, Artini PG, Giulini S et al. Color Doppler changes and thromboxane production after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist. Hum. Reprod.12, 2477–2482 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Jiang MC, Ho HN, Yang YS. Association of endometrial blood flow as determined by a modified color Doppler technique with subsequent outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod.14, 1606–1610 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contart P, Baruffi RL, Coelho J, Mauri AL, Petersen C, Franco JG Jr. Power Doppler endometrial evaluation as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation in an ICSI program. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.17, 329–334 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, Xiao J, Tseng CR. Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial–subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.78, 245–251 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maugey-Laulon B, Commenges-Ducos M, Jullien V, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Scotet V, Commenges D. Endometrial vascularity and ongoing pregnancy after IVF. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.104, 137–143 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pairleitner H, Steiner H, Hasenoehrl G, Staudach. A three-dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.14, 139–143 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR. The reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.22, 633–639 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR. The interobserver reliability of three-dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.23, 501–508 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild RL, Holthanus S, Alquen JD et al. Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum. Reprod.15, 89–94 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, Chao AS, Wang HS, Soong YK. Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.79, 507–511 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Willeke C, Wendt A, van der Ven H, Schild RL. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound of the subendometrial blood flow under the administration of a contrast agent (Levovist). Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.270, 94–98 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, Yeung WSB, Ho PC. Factors affecting endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum. Reprod.21, 1062–1069 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser IS, McCarron G, Hutton B, Macey D. Endometrial blood flow measured by xenon 133 clearance in women with normal menstrual cycles and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.156, 158–166 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Hum. Reprod.19, 330–338 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe M, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Mall G, Leyendecker G. The cyclic pattern of the immunocytochemical expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human myometrial and endometrial layers: characterization of the endometrial-subendometrial unit. Hum. Reprod.14, 190–197 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. Endometrial and subendometrial perfusion are impaired in women with unexplained subfertility. Hum. Reprod.19, 2605–2614 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey AM, Day K, McPherson A et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human endometrium is regulated by hypoxia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.85, 402–409 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham CH, Postovit LM, Park H, Canning MT, Fitzpatrick TE. Adriana and Luisa Castellucci award lecture 1999: role of oxygen in the regulation of trophoblast gene expression and invasion. Placenta21, 443–450 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar