Photoallergy

References

• Tokura Y. Immune responses to photohaptens: implications for the mechanisms of photosensitivity to exogenous agents. J. Dermatol. Sci.23(Suppl. 1), S6–S9 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz KJ. [Experimental studies on sulfanilamide and chlorpromazine photoallergy]. Dermatologica139(Suppl. 1), 1 (1969).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kondo S, Kagaya M, Yamada Y, Matsusaka H, Jimbow K. UVB photosensitivity due to ranitidine. Dermatology201(1), 71–73 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y, Iwamoto Y, Mizutani K, Takigawa M. Sparfloxacin phototoxicity: potential photoaugmentation by ultraviolet A and B sources. Arch. Dermatol. Res.288(1), 45–50 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokura Y, Satoh T, Takigawa M, Yamada M. Genetic control of contact photosensitivity to tetrachlorosalicylanilide. I. Preferential activation of suppressor T cells in low responder H-2k mice. J. Invest. Dermatol.94(4), 471–476 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y. Quinolone photoallergy: photosensitivity dermatitis induced by systemic administration of photohaptenic drugs. J. Dermatol. Sci.18(1), 1–10 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yagi H, Tokura Y, Wakita H, Furukawa F, Takigawa M. TCRV β 7+ Th2 cells mediate UVB-induced suppression of murine contact photosensitivity by releasing IL-10. J. Immunol.156(5), 1824–1831 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelson RL. Sezary syndrome, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and extracorporeal photopheresis. Arch. Dermatol.135(5), 600–601 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauvaigo S, Douki T, Odin F, Caillat S, Ravanat JL, Cadet J. Analysis of fluoroquinolone-mediated photosensitization of 2´-deoxyguanosine, calf thymus and cellular DNA: determination of type-I, type-II and triplet-triplet energy transfer mechanism contribution. Photochem. Photobiol.73(3), 230–237 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurita M, Shimauchi T, Kobayashi M, Atarashi K, Mori K, Tokura Y. Induction of keratinocyte apoptosis by photosensitizing chemicals plus UVA. J. Dermatol. Sci.45(2), 105–112 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Commission Directive 2000/33/EC. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL136/190–L136/107 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ray RS, Agrawal N, Sharma A, Hans RK. Use of L-929 cell line for phototoxicity assessment. Toxicol. In Vitro22(7), 1775–1781 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokura Y, Ogai M, Yagi H, Takigawa M. Afloqualone photosensitivity: immunogenicity of afloqualone-photomodified epidermal cells. Photochem. Photobiol.60(3), 262–267 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schnyder B, Pichler WJ. Mechanisms of drug-induced allergy. Mayo Clin. Proc.84(3), 268–272 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y, Nishijima T, Yagi H, Furukawa F, Takigawa M. Photohaptenic properties of fluoroquinolones. Photochem. Photobiol.64(5), 838–844 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein KR, Scheinfeld NS. Drug-induced photoallergic and phototoxic reactions. Expert Opin. Drug Saf.6(4), 431–443 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein JH. Phototoxicity and photoallergy in man. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.8(2), 141–147 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber LC, Harris H, Baer RL. Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Due to halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds. Arch. Dermatol.94(3), 255–262 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giovinazzo VJ, Harber LC, Bickers DR, Armstrong RB, Silvers DN. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to musk ambrette. Histopathologic features of photobiologic reactions observed in a persistent light reactor. Arch. Dermatol.117(6), 344–348 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosca F, Miranda MA. Photosensitizing drugs containing the benzophenone chromophore. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B43(1), 1–26 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devleeschouwer V, Roelandts R, Garmyn M, Goossens A. Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen: results of (photo) patch testing and follow-up of 42 patients. Contact Dermatitis58(3), 159–166 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita H, Matsuo I. Type I lipid photo-oxidation by the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug suprofen: a possible key to its photosensitivity. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed.9(5), 203–208 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asensio T, Sanchis ME, Sanchez P, Vega JM, Garcia JC. Photocontact dermatitis because of oral dexketoprofen. Contact Dermatitis58(1), 59–60 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Abad R, Paniagua MJ, Botey E, Gaig P, Rodriguez P, Richart C. Topical dexketoprofen as a cause of photocontact dermatitis. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol.14(3), 247–249 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez-Jorge B, Goday Bujan JJ, Paradela S, Mazaira M, Fonseca E. Consort photocontact dermatitis from piketoprofen. Contact Dermatitis58(2), 113–115 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kowalzick L, Ziegler H. Photoallergic contact dermatitis from topical diclofenac in solaraze gel. Contact Dermatitis54(6), 348–349 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez-Arnau A, Gilaberte M, Conde D, Espona M, Pujol RM. Combined photocontact dermatitis to benzydamine hydrochloride and the emulsifiers, Span 60 and Tween 60 contained in Tantum cream. Contact Dermatitis57(1), 61–62 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collaris EJ, Frank J. Photoallergic contact dermatitis caused by ultraviolet filters in different sunscreens. Int. J. Dermatol.47(Suppl. 1), 35–37 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry EJ, Bilsland D, Morley WN. Photocontact allergy to 4-tert.butyl-4´-methoxy-dibenzoylmethane (Parsol 1789). Contact Dermatitis32(4), 251–252 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Journe F, Marguery MC, Rakotondrazafy J, El Sayed F, Bazex J. Sunscreen sensitization: a 5-year study. Acta Derm. Venereol.79(3), 211–213 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maier T, Korting HC. Sunscreens – which and what for? Skin Pharmacol. Physiol.18(6), 253–262 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takigawa M, Miyachi Y. Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice: I. T cell regulation of contact photosensitivity to tetrachlorosalicylanilide under the genetic restrictions of the major histocompatibility complex. J. Invest. Dermatol.79(2), 108–115 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyachi Y, Takigawa M. Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice. III. Predictive testing of chemicals with photoallergenic potential in mice. Arch. Dermatol.119(9), 736–739 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai S, Atarashi K, Ikesue K, Akiyama K, Tokura Y. Establishment of murine model of allergic photocontact dermatitis to ketoprofen and characterization of pathogenic T cells. J. Dermatol. Sci.41(2), 127–136 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atarashi K, Kabashima K, Akiyama K, Tokura Y. Stimulation of Langerhans cells with ketoprofen plus UVA in murine photocontact dermatitis to ketoprofen. J. Dermatol. Sci.47(2), 151–159 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Von Bargen EC, Stuard SB, Ridder GM. Examination of tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCSA) photoallergy using in vitro photohapten-modified Langerhans cell-enriched epidermal cells. J. Invest. Dermatol.97(2), 210–218 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Fletcher ER, Howard AD, Robinson MK. Increased number of dendritic cells in draining lymph nodes accompanies the generation of contact photosensitivity. J. Invest. Dermatol.96(3), 355–361 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan DH, Jenison MC, Saeland S, Shlomchik WD, Shlomchik MJ. Epidermal langerhans cell-deficient mice develop enhanced contact hypersensitivity. Immunity23(6), 611–620 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiki R, Kabashima K, Sugita K, Atarashi K, Shimauchi T, Tokura Y. IL-10-producing Langerhans cells and regulatory T cells are responsible for depressed contact hypersensitivity in grafted skin. J. Invest. Dermatol.129(3), 705–713 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishijima T, Tokura Y, Imokawa G, Takigawa M. Photohapten TCSA painting plus UVA irradiation of murine skin augments the expression of MHC class II molecules and CD86 on Langerhans cells. J. Dermatol. Sci.19(3), 202–207 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hino R, Orimo H, Kabashima K et al. Evaluation of photoallergic potential of chemicals using THP-1 cells. J. Dermatol. Sci.52(2), 140–143 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki K, Yamazaki S, Tokura Y. Expression of T-cell cytokines in challenged skin of murine allergic contact photosensitivity: low responsiveness is associated with induction of Th2 cytokines. J. Dermatol. Sci.23(2), 138–144 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore DE. Drug-induced cutaneous photosensitivity: incidence, mechanism, prevention and management. Drug Saf.25(5), 345–372 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague JS, Ilchyshyn A. Lichenoid photosensitive eruption due to capecitabine chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.32(1), 102–103 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamanaka H, Mizutani H, Shimizu M. Sparfloxacin-induced photosensitivity and the occurrence of a lichenoid tissue reaction after prolonged exposure. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.38(6 Pt 1), 945–949 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West AJ, Berger TG, LeBoit PE. A comparative histopathologic study of photodistributed and nonphotodistributed lichenoid drug eruptions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.23(4 Pt 1), 689–693 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y, Seo N, Yagi H, Furukawa F, Takigawa M. Cross-reactivity in murine fluoroquinolone photoallergy: exclusive usage of TCR Vβ13 by immune T cells that recognize fluoroquinolone-photomodified cells. J. Immunol.160(8), 3719–3728 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y, Seo N, Fujie M, Takigawa M. Quinolone-photoconjugated major histocompatibility complex class II-binding peptides with lysine are antigenic for T cells mediating murine quinolone photoallergy. J. Invest. Dermatol.117(5), 1206–1211 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishio D, Nakashima D, Mori T, Kabashima K, Tokura Y. Induction of eosinophil-infiltrating drug photoallergy in mice. J. Dermatol. Sci. (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sassolas B, Menard N, Guillet G. Photoallergic reactions to piroxicam and thiomersal sensitivity. Clin. Exp. Dermatol.19(2), 189 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yokote R, Tokura Y, Igarashi N, Ishikawa O, Miyachi Y. Photosensitive drug eruption induced by flutamide. Eur. J. Dermatol.8(6), 427–429 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki T, Shimizu H, Tokuyama S et al. Antigenic characterization in ampiroxicam-induced photosensitivity using an in vivo model of contact hypersensitivity. J. Dermatol. Sci.21(3), 170–175 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokura Y, Seo N, Ohshima A, Yagi H, Furukawa F, Takigawa M. Lymphocyte stimulation test with drug-photomodified cells in patients with quinolone photosensitivity. J. Dermatol. Sci.21(1), 34–41 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohshima A, Seo N, Takigawa M, Tokura Y. Formation of antigenic quinolone photoadducts on Langerhans cells initiates photoallergy to systemically administered quinolone in mice. J. Invest. Dermatol.114(3), 569–575 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izu K, Hino R, Isoda H, Nkashima D, Kabashima K, Tokura Y. Photocontact dermatitis to ketoprofen presenting with erythema multiforme. Eur. J. Dermatol.18(6), 710–713 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar