4
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Dermatologists, melanoma and the law

, , , , &
Pages 341-354 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA293(21), 2609–2617 (2005).
  • Malpractice survey snapshot. Who’s been sued – and who won. Med. Econ.76(14), 58–60, 65, 69 (1999).
  • Read S, Hill HF 3rd. Dermatology’s malpractice experience: clinical settings for risk management. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.53(1), 134–137 (2005).
  • Lydiatt DD. Medical malpractice and cancer of the skin. Am. J. Surg.187(6), 688–694 (2004).
  • Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts. Keeton P, Prosser WL. (Eds). West Pub. Co., St. Paul, MN, USA (1984).
  • Hall v. Hilburn, 466 So.2d 856, 873 (MS. 1985).
  • Feit NE, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA. Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography. Br. J. Dermatol.150(4), 706–714 (2004).
  • Kelly JW, Yeatman JM, Regalia C, Mason G, Henham AP. A high incidence of melanoma found in patients with multiple dysplastic naevi by photographic surveillance. Med. J. Aust.167(4), 191–194 (1997).
  • Masri GD, Clark WH Jr, Guerry D 4th, Halpern A, Thompson CJ, Elder DE. Screening and surveillance of patients at high risk for malignant melanoma result in detection of earlier disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.22(6 Pt 1), 1042–1048 (1990).
  • Rivers JK, Kopf AW, Vinokur AF et al. Clinical characteristics of malignant melanomas developing in persons with dysplastic nevi. Cancer65(5), 1232–1236 (1990).
  • Mello MM. Of swords and shields: the role of clinical practice guidelines in medical malpractice litigation. U. Pa. L. Rev.149, 645 (2001).
  • The T.J. Hooper, 60 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1932).
  • Epstein RA. Torts. Aspen Law & Business, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (1999).
  • Frye v. U.S., 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir. 1923).
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Parmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (S.Ct. 1993).
  • Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (S.Ct. 1999).
  • Reisig RA Jr. The Loss of Chance Theory in Medical Malpractice Cases: an Overview. Am. J. Trial Advoc.1163 (1990).
  • Lipsker D, Engel F, Cribier B, Velten M, Hedelin G. Trends in melanoma epidemiology suggest three different types of melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol.157(2), 338–343 (2007).
  • Lipsker D. Growth rate, early detection, and prevention of melanoma: melanoma epidemiology revisited and future challenges. Arch. Dermatol.142(12), 1638–1640 (2006).
  • Ferrara G, Zalaudek I, Di Stefani A, Soyer HP, Argenziano G. Do we detect a new spectrum of biologically ‘benign’ melanomas in the dermoscopy era? Melanoma Res.14(6), 567–568 (2004).
  • Berwick M. Evaluating early detection in the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch. Dermatol.142, 1485–1486 (2006).
  • Baade PD, English DR, Youl PH, McPherson M, Elwood JM, Aitken JF. The relationship between melanoma thickness and time to diagnosis in a large population-based study. Arch. Dermatol.142(11), 1422–1427 (2006).
  • Brochez L, Verhaeghe E, Bleyen L, Naeyaert JM. Time delays and related factors in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer37(7), 843–848 (2001).
  • Krige JE, Isaacs S, Hudson DA, King HS, Strover RM, Johnson CA. Delay in the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. A prospective study in 250 patients. Cancer68(9), 2064–2068 (1991).
  • Liu W, Dowling JP, Murray WK et al. Rate of growth in melanomas: characteristics and associations of rapidly growing melanomas. Arch. Dermatol.142(12), 1551–1558 (2006).
  • Rustad M, Koenig T. Reconceptualizing Punitive Damages in Medical Malpractice: Targeting Amoral Corporations, Not ‘Moral Monsters’. Rutgers L. R.47, 975 (1995).
  • Bleyer A, Viny A, Barr R. Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist11(6), 590–601 (2006).
  • Lydiatt DD. Cancer of the oral cavity and medical malpractice. Laryngoscope112(5), 816–819 (2002).
  • Broder IE. Characteristics of Million Dollar Awards: Jury Verdicts and Final Disbursements. Just. Sys. J.349. (1986).
  • Fabre v. Marin, 623 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 1993).
  • Apple JG, Deyling RP. A Primer on the Civil-Law System. Federal Judicial Center, (1995).
  • Clermont KM, Sherwin E. A Comparative Vew of Standards of Proof. Am. J. Comp. L.50, 243 (2002).
  • Davis WK. The international view of attorney fees in civil suits: why is the united states the ‘odd man out’ in how it pays its lawyers? Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L.16, 361 (1999).
  • Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Kopf AW et al. Importance of complete cutaneous examination for the detection of malignant melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.14(5 Pt 1), 857–860 (1986).
  • Marghoob AA, Scope A. The complexity of diagnosing melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol.129(1), 11–13 (2009).
  • Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Marghoob AA et al. Time required for a complete skin examination with and without dermoscopy: a prospective, randomized multicenter study. Arch. Dermatol.144(4), 509–513 (2008).
  • Grin CM, Kopf AW, Welkovich B, Bart RS, Levenstein MJ. Accuracy in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Arch. Dermatol.126(6), 763–766 (1990).
  • Morton CA, Mackie RM. Clinical accuracy of the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol.138(2), 283–287 (1998).
  • Witheiler DD, Cockerell CJ. Histologic features and sensitivity of diagnosis of clinically unsuspected cutaneous melanoma. Am. J. Dermatopathol.13(6), 551–556 (1991).
  • Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch. Dermatol.137(10), 1343–1350 (2001).
  • Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol.3(3), 159–165 (2002).
  • Troxel DB. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma: findings of a risk management panel study. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.27(9), 1278–1283 (2003).
  • Bergenmar M, Ringborg U, Mansson Brahme E, Brandberg Y. Nodular histogenetic type – the most significant factor for thick melanoma: implications for prevention. Melanoma Res.8(5), 403–411 (1998).
  • Demierre MF, Chung C, Miller DR, Geller AC. Early detection of thick melanomas in the United States: beware of the nodular subtype. Arch. Dermatol.141(6), 745–750 (2005).
  • Chamberlain AJ, Fritschi L, Giles GG, Dowling JP, Kelly JW. Nodular type and older age as the most significant associations of thick melanoma in Victoria, Australia. Arch. Dermatol.138(5), 609–614 (2002).
  • Chamberlain AJ, Fritschi L, Kelly JW. Nodular melanoma: patients’ perceptions of presenting features and implications for earlier detection. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.48(5), 694–701 (2003).
  • Betti R, Vergani R, Tolomio E, Santambrogio R, Crosti C. Factors of delay in the diagnosis of melanoma. Eur. J. Dermatol.13(2), 183–188 (2003).
  • Kelly JW. Nodular melanoma: how current approaches to early detection are failing. J. Drugs Dermatol.4(6), 790–793 (2005).
  • Moynihan GD. The 3 Cs of melanoma: time for a change? J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.30(3), 510–511 (1994).
  • Abbasi NR, Shaw HM, Rigel DS et al. Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria. JAMA292(22), 2771–2776 (2004).
  • Swetter SM, Soon S, Harrington CR, Chen SC. Effect of health care delivery models on melanoma thickness and stage in a university-based referral center: an observational pilot study. Arch. Dermatol.143(1), 30–36 (2007).
  • Scope A, Dusza SW, Halpern AC et al. The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: agreement between observers. Arch. Dermatol.144(1), 58–64 (2008).
  • Sondergaard K. Biological behaviour of cutaneous malignant melanomas. Pathology17(2), 255–257 (1985).
  • Bergenmar M, Hansson J, Brandberg Y. Detection of nodular and superficial spreading melanoma with tumour thickness < or = 2.0 mm: an interview study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev.11(1), 49–55 (2002).
  • Bono A, Maurichi A, Moglia D et al. Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of early amelanotic melanoma. Melanoma Res.11(5), 491–494 (2001).
  • Bowling J, Argenziano G, Azenha A et al. Dermoscopy key points: recommendations from the international dermoscopy society. Dermatology214(1), 3–5 (2007).
  • Puig S, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I et al. Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: a combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. Dermatol. Surg.33(10), 1262–1273 (2007).
  • Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G et al. Dermoscopy features of melanoma incognito: indications for biopsy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.56(3), 508–513 (2007).
  • Lodha S, Saggar S, Celebi JT, Silvers DN. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of difficult melanocytic neoplasms in the clinical setting. J. Cutan. Pathol.35(4), 349–352 (2008).
  • Brochez L, Verhaeghe E, Grosshans E et al. Inter-observer variation in the histopathological diagnosis of clinically suspicious pigmented skin lesions. J. Pathol.196(4), 459–466 (2002).
  • Corona R, Mele A, Amini M et al. Interobserver variability on the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. J. Clin. Oncol.14(4), 1218–1223 (1996).
  • Farmer ER, Gonin R, Hanna MP. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists. Hum. Pathol.27(6), 528–531 (1996).
  • Molenkamp BG, Sluijter BJ, Oosterhof B, Meijer S, van Leeuwen PA. Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival. Ann. Surg. Oncol.14(4), 1424–1430 (2007).
  • Bong JL, Herd RM, Hunter JA. Incisional biopsy and melanoma prognosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.46(5), 690–694 (2002).
  • Karimipour DJ, Schwartz JL, Wang TS et al. Microstaging accuracy after subtotal incisional biopsy of cutaneous melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.52(5), 798–802 (2005).
  • Ng PC, Barzilai DA, Ismail SA, Averitte RL Jr, Gilliam AC. Evaluating invasive cutaneous melanoma: is the initial biopsy representative of the final depth? J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.48(3), 420–424 (2003).
  • Lederman JS, Sober AJ. Does wide excision as the initial diagnostic procedure improve prognosis in patients with cutaneous melanoma? J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol.12(7), 697–699 (1986).
  • McKenna DB, Lee RJ, Prescott RJ, Doherty VR. The time from diagnostic excision biopsy to wide local excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma may not affect patient survival. Br. J. Dermatol.147(1), 48–54 (2002).
  • Martin RC, 2nd, Scoggins CR, Ross MI et al. Is incisional biopsy of melanoma harmful? Am. J. Surg.190(6), 913–917 (2005).
  • Griffiths RW, Briggs JC. Biopsy procedures, primary wide excisional surgery and long term prognosis in primary clinical stage I invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.67(2), 75–78 (1985).
  • Lees VC, Briggs JC. Effect of initial biopsy procedure on prognosis in stage 1 invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma: review of 1086 patients. Br. J. Surg.78(9), 1108–1110 (1991).
  • Somach SC, Taira JW, Pitha JV, Everett MA. Pigmented lesions in actinically damaged skin. Histopathologic comparison of biopsy and excisional specimens. Arch. Dermatol.132(11), 1297–1302 (1996).
  • Glusac EJ. Under the microscope: doctors, lawyers, and melanocytic neoplasms. J. Cutan. Pathol.30(5), 287–293 (2003).
  • Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J. Clin. Oncol.19(16), 3622–3634 (2001).
  • MacKie RM, Bray CA, Hole DJ et al. Incidence of and survival from malignant melanoma in Scotland: an epidemiological study. Lancet360(9333), 587–591 (2002).
  • Tripp JM, Kopf AW, Marghoob AA, Bart RS. Management of dysplastic nevi: a survey of fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.46(5), 674–682 (2002).
  • Dyson SW, Bass J, Pomeranz J, Jaworsky C, Sigel J, Somach S. Impact of thorough block sampling in the histologic evaluation of melanomas. Arch. Dermatol.141(6), 734–736 (2005).
  • Breslow A. Problems in the measurement of tumor thickness and level of invasion in cutaneous melanoma. Hum. Pathol.8(1), 1–2 (1977).
  • Yadav S, Vossaert KA, Kopf AW, Silverman M, Grin-Jorgensen C. Histopathologic correlates of structures seen on dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy). Am. J. Dermatopathol.15(4), 297–305 (1993).
  • Braun RP, Kaya G, Masouye I, Krischer J, Saurat JH. Histopathologic correlation in dermoscopy: a micropunch technique. Arch. Dermatol.139(3), 349–351 (2003).
  • Soyer HP, Kenet RO, Wolf IH, Kenet BJ, Cerroni L. Clinicopathological correlation of pigmented skin lesions using dermoscopy. Eur. J. Dermatol.10(1), 22–28 (2000).
  • Soyer HP, Massone C, Ferrara G, Argenziano G. Limitations of histopathologic analysis in the recognition of melanoma: a plea for a combined diagnostic approach of histopathologic and dermoscopic evaluation. Arch. Dermatol.141(2), 209–211 (2005).
  • Bolognia JL, Lin A, Shapiro PE. The significance of eccentric foci of hyperpigmentation (‘small dark dots’) within melanocytic nevi. Analysis of 59 cases. Arch. Dermatol.130(8), 1013–1017 (1994).
  • Park HK, Leonard DD, Arrington JH 3rd, Lund HZ. Recurrent melanocytic nevi: clinical and histologic review of 175 cases. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.17(2 Pt 1), 285–292 (1987).
  • Botella-Estrada R, Nagore E, Sopena J et al. Clinical, dermoscopy and histological correlation study of melanotic pigmentations in excision scars of melanocytic tumours. Br. J. Dermatol.154(3), 478–484 (2006).
  • Marghoob AA, Korzenko A. Recurrent (persistent) nevi. In: Atlas of Dermoscopy. Marghoob AA, Braun RP, Kopf AW (Eds). Taylor & Francis, NY, USA (2005).
  • Spatz A, Ruiter D, Hardmeier T et al. Melanoma in childhood: an EORTC-MCG multicenter study on the clinico–pathological aspects. Int. J. Cancer68(3), 317–324 (1996).
  • Barnhill RL. The Spitzoid lesion: rethinking Spitz tumors, atypical variants, ‘Spitzoid melanoma’ and risk assessment. Mod. Pathol.19(Suppl. 2), S21–S33 (2006).
  • Crotty KA, McCarthy SW, Palmer AA et al. Malignant melanoma in childhood: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases and comparison with Spitz nevi. World J. Surg.16(2), 179–185 (1992).
  • Wechsler J, Bastuji-Garin S, Spatz A et al. Reliability of the histopathologic diagnosis of malignant melanoma in childhood. Arch. Dermatol.138(5), 625–628 (2002).
  • Barnhill RL. The spitzoid lesion: the importance of atypical variants and risk assessment. Am. J. Dermatopathol.28(1), 75–83 (2006).
  • Gelbard SN, Tripp JM, Marghoob AA et al. Management of Spitz nevi: a survey of dermatologists in the United States. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.47(2), 224–230 (2002).
  • Herreid PA, Shapiro PE. Age distribution of Spitz nevus vs malignant melanoma. Arch. Dermatol.132(3), 352–353 (1996).
  • Piepkorn M. On the nature of histologic observations: the case of the Spitz nevus. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.32(2 Pt 1), 248–254 (1995).
  • Barnhill RL, Flotte TJ, Fleischli M, Perez-Atayde A. Cutaneous melanoma and atypical Spitz tumors in childhood. Cancer76(10), 1833–1845 (1995).
  • Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Pinkel D. Mutations and copy number increase of HRAS in Spitz nevi with distinctive histopathological features. Am. J. Pathol.157(3), 967–972 (2000).
  • Urso C, Borgognoni L, Saieva C et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ‘atypical Spitz tumors.’ a report on 12 cases. Hum. Pathol.37(7), 816–823 (2006).
  • Bastian BC. Molecular cytogenetics as a diagnostic tool for typing melanocytic tumors. Recent Results Cancer Res.160, 92–99 (2002).
  • Conley J, Lattes R, Orr W. Desmoplastic malignant melanoma (a rare variant of spindle cell melanoma). Cancer28(4), 914–936 (1971).
  • Whitaker DC, Argenyi Z, Smith AC. Desmoplastic malignant melanoma: rare and difficult to diagnose. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.26(5 Pt 1), 704–709 (1992).
  • Smithers BM, McLeod GR, Little JH. Desmoplastic, neural transforming and neurotropic melanoma: a review of 45 cases. Aust. NZ J. Surg.60(12), 967–972 (1990).
  • Lens MB, Newton-Bishop JA, Boon AP. Desmoplastic malignant melanoma: a systematic review. Br. J. Dermatol.152(4), 673–678 (2005).
  • Busam KJ. Cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma. Adv. Anat. Pathol.12(2), 92–102 (2005).
  • Hawkins WG, Busam KJ, Ben-Porat L et al. Desmoplastic melanoma: a pathologically and clinically distinct form of cutaneous melanoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol.12(3), 207–213 (2005).
  • Gyorki DE, Busam K, Panageas K, Brady MS, Coit DG. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol.10(4), 403–407 (2003).
  • Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Corona R et al. Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study. Arch. Dermatol.140(12), 1485–1489 (2004).
  • Debarbieux S, Ronger-Salve S, Dalle S, Balme B, Thomas L. Dermoscopy of desmoplastic melanoma: report of six cases. Br. J. Dermatol.159(2), 360–363 (2008).
  • Thosani MK, Marghoob A, Chen CS. Current progress of immunostains in Mohs micrographic surgery: a review. Dermatol. Surg.34(12), 1621–1636 (2008).
  • Laveau F, Picot MC, Dereure O, Guilhou JJ, Guillot B. [Metastatic melanoma of unknown primary site]. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol.128(8–9), 893–898 (2001).
  • Lee CC, Faries MB, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Improved survival after lymphadenectomy for nodal metastasis from an unknown primary melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol.26(4), 535–541 (2008).
  • Giuliano AE, Cochran AJ, Morton DL. Melanoma from unknown primary site and amelanotic melanoma. Semin. Oncol.9(4), 442–447 (1982).
  • Paraskevas LR, Halpern AC, Marghoob AA. Utility of the Wood’s light: five cases from a pigmented lesion clinic. Br. J. Dermatol.152(5), 1039–1044 (2005).
  • Bories N, Dalle S, Debarbieux S, Balme B, Ronger-Savle S, Thomas L. Dermoscopy of fully regressive cutaneous melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol.158(6), 1224–1229 (2008).
  • Cormier JN, Xing Y, Feng L et al. Metastatic melanoma to lymph nodes in patients with unknown primary sites. Cancer106(9), 2012–2020 (2006).
  • Giacomel J, Zalaudek I, Mordente I, Nicolino R, Argenziano G. Never perform laser treatment of skin tumors with clinical ‘EFG’ criteria. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges.6(5), 386–388 (2008).
  • Zabel RJ, Vinson RP, McCollough ML. Malignant melanoma arising in a seborrheic keratosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.42(5 Pt 1), 831–833 (2000).
  • Figgener L, Runte C. Digital radiography and electronic data storage from the perspective of legal requirements for record keeping. J. Forensic Odontostomatol.21(2), 40–44 (2003).
  • Scheinfeld NS, Flanigan K, Moshiyakhov M, Weinberg JM. Trends in the use of cameras and computer technology among dermatologists in New York city 2001–2002. Dermatol. Surg.29(8), 822–825 (2003).
  • Scheinfeld N. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law. Arch. Dermatol.140(4), 473–476 (2004).
  • Nehal KS, Oliveria SA, Marghoob AA et al. Use of and beliefs about baseline photography in the management of patients with pigmented lesions: a survey of dermatology residency programmes in the United States. Melanoma Res.12(2), 161–167 (2002).
  • Keach E. Successful malpractice defense lies in the body of evidence. In: Dermatology Times (2006).
  • Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br. J. Dermatol.159(3), 669–676 (2008).
  • Altman J. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Medical Malpractice Closed Claim Study 1975–1978: a review of dermatologic claims. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.5(6), 721–725 (1981).
  • Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N. Engl. J. Med.325(4), 245–251 (1991).
  • Witman AB, Park DM, Hardin SB. How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? A survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting. Arch. Intern. Med.156(22), 2565–2569 (1996).
  • Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.43(3), 467–476 (2000).
  • Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, Batrac A, McCarthy WH. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch. Dermatol.137(12), 1583–1589 (2001).
  • Halpern AC. The use of whole body photography in a pigmented lesion clinic. Dermatol. Surg.26(12), 1175–1180 (2000).
  • Kovalyshyn I, Dusza SW, Siamas K, Halpern AC, Argenziano G, Marghoob A. A historical cohort study of melanoma detection patterns at a pigmented lesion clinic, 1998–2008. Presented at: Sixth International Symposium On Melanoma And Other Cutaneous Malignancies. NY, USA, 13–14 March 2009 (Abstract).
  • Busam KJ, Charles C, Lohmann CM, Marghoob A, Goldgeier M, Halpern AC. Detection of intraepidermal malignant melanoma in vivo by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Melanoma Res.12(4), 349–355 (2002).
  • Guitera P, Pellacani G, Longo C, Seidenari S, Avramidis M, Menzies SW. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions. J. Invest. Dermatol.129(1), 131–138 (2009).
  • Marghoob AA, Swindle LD, Moricz CZ et al. Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.49(5), 777–797; quiz 798–779 (2003).
  • Langley RG, Walsh N, Sutherland AE et al. The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy compared to dermoscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: a prospective study. Dermatology215(4), 365–372 (2007).
  • Elbaum M, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS et al. Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.44(2), 207–218 (2001).
  • Gutkowicz-Krusin D, Elbaum M, Jacobs A et al. Precision of automatic measurements of pigmented skin lesion parameters with a MelaFind™ multispectral digital dermoscope. Melanoma Res.10(6), 563–570 (2000).
  • Wolff T, Tai E, Miller T. Screening for skin cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med.150(3), 194–198 (2009).
  • Warycha MA, Christos PJ, Mazumdar M et al. Changes in the presentation of nodular and superficial spreading melanomas over 35 years. Cancer113(12), 3341–3348 (2008).
  • Kashani-Sabet M, Rangel J, Torabian S et al. A multi-marker assay to distinguish malignant melanomas from benign nevi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106(15), 6268–6272 (2009).

Website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.