Tubal assessment and disease

References

• Thiel JA, Suchet IB, Lortie K. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil. Steril.84, 504–508 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veersema S, Vleugels MP, Timmermans A, Brolmann HA. Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound. Fertil. Steril.84, 1733–1736 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S. Transvaginal ultrasonographic study of the fallopian tube. Obstet. Gynecol.70, 424–428 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis JA, Gosink BB. Fluid in the female pelvis: cyclic patterns. J. Ultrasound Med.5, 75–79 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Bar-Yam Y, Elgali S, Rottem S. The technique of transvaginal sonography with the use of a 6.5 MHz probe. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.158, 1019–1024 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottem S, Thaler I, Goldstein SR, Timor-Tritsch IE, Brandes JM. Transvaginal sonographic technique: targeted organ scanning without resorting to ‘planes’. J. Clin. Ultrasound18, 243–247 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monteagudo A, Lerner JP, Timor-Tritsch IE. The normal fallopian tube. In: Ultrasound and the Fallopian Tube. Timor-Tritsch IE (Ed.). The Parthenon Publishing Group Inc., NY, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS. Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.12, 56–66 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessler FN, Perrella RR, Fleischer AC, Grant EG. Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated fallopian tubes. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.153, 523–525 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strandell A. The influence of hydrosalpinx on IVF and embryo transfer: a review. Hum. Reprod. Update6, 387–395 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapron C, Pierre F, Querleu D, Dubuisson JB. Complications of laparoscopy in gynecology. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.29, 605–612 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittmer MH, Famuyide AO, Creedon DJ, Hartman RP. Hysterosalpingography for assessing efficacy of Essure microinsert permanent birth control device. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.187, 955–958 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril.64, 486–491 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou S, Bourdrez P, Varma R, Afnan M, Mol BW, Coomarasamy A. Tubal evaluation in the investigation of subfertility: a structured comparison of tests. BJOG111, 1313–1321 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg JM, Falcone T, Attaran M. Sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine abnormalities noted on hysterosalpingography. Hum. Reprod.12, 2151–2153 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahendru A, Gajjar K, Hamed AT. Complete unilateral absence of fallopian tube. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.101, 78–79 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opsahl MS, Miller B, Klein TA. The predictive value of hysterosalpingography for tubal and peritoneal infertility factors. Fertil. Steril.60, 444–448 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerlock AJ Jr, Hooser CW. Oviduct response to glucagon during hysterosalpingography. Radiology119, 727–728 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson N, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Lilford R, Harada T, Hughes E. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.(3), CD003718 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Richman TS, Viscomi GN, de Cherney A, Polan ML, Alcebo LO. Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Work in progress. Radiology152, 507–510 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darwish AM, Youssef AA. Screening sonohysterography in infertility. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.48, 43–47 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitri FF, Andronikou AD, Perpinyal S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. A clinical comparison of sonographic hydrotubation and hysterosalpingography. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.98, 1031–1036 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tekay A, Spalding H, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Agreement between two successive transvaginal salpingosonography assessments of tubal patency. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.76, 572–575 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci EC, Girit S, Bayirli E, Durmusoglu F, Yalti S. Evaluation of tubal patency by transvaginal sonosalpingography. Fertil. Steril.57, 336–340 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman L, Chan K, Smith B, Okolo S. The value of saline salpingosonography as a surrogate test of tubal patency in low-resource settings. Int. J. Fertil. Womens Med.50, 135–139 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sankpal RS, Confino E, Matzel A, Cohen LS. Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.73, 125–129 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan CC, Ng EH, Tang OS, Chan KK, Ho PC. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.84, 909–913 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet RL, Draper DL, Hadley WK. Etiology of acute salpingitis: influence of episode number and duration of symptoms. Obstet. Gynecol.58, 62–68 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper DE, Brockwell NJ, Dalton HP. Microbial etiology of urban emergency department acute salpingitis: treatment with ofloxacin. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.167, 653–660 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisala K, Heinonen PK, Punnonen R. Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of acute pyosalpinx. J. Reprod. Med.35, 19–21 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunham RC, Binns B, Guijon F et al. Etiology and outcome of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. J. Infect. Dis.158, 510–517 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness RB, Hillier SL, Kip KE et al. Bacterial vaginosis and risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet. Gynecol.104, 761–769 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherpes TL, Wiesenfeld HC, Melan MA et al. The associations between pelvic inflammatory disease, trichomonas vaginalis infection, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm. Dis.33, 747–752 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Ness RB, Blume J et al. Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.184, 856–863; discussion 863–864 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaitan H, Angel E, Diaz R, Parada A, Sanchez L, Vargas C. Accuracy of five different diagnostic techniques in mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol.10, 171–180 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Workowski KA, Berman SM. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm. Rep.55, 1–94 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulas DI, Ahlstrom PA, Sivit CJ, Blask AR, O’Donnell RM. Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic evaluation. Radiology183, 435–439 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patten RM, Vincent LM, Wolner-Hanssen P, Thorpe E Jr. Pelvic inflammatory disease. Endovaginal sonography with laparoscopic correlation. J. Ultrasound Med.9, 681–689 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacciatore B, Leminen A, Ingman-Friberg S, Ylostalo P, Paavonen J. Transvaginal sonographic findings in ambulatory patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet. Gynecol.80, 912–916 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atri M, Tran CN, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen GM. Accuracy of endovaginal sonography for the detection of fallopian tube blockage. J. Ultrasound Med.13, 429–434 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taipale P, Tarjanne H, Ylostalo P. Transvaginal sonography in suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.6, 430–434 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, Lewitt N. The fallopian tube. In: Transvaginal Sonography. Timor-Tritsch IE (Ed.). Chapman & Hall, NY, USA (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Bellah RD, Rosenberg HK. Transvaginal ultrasound in a children’s hospital: is it worthwhile? Pediatr. Radiol.21, 570–574 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch I. Adnexal masses. In: Ultrasound in Gynecology. Goldstein S, Timor-Tritsch IE (Eds). Churchill-Livingstone, NY, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Molander P, Sjoberg J, Paavonen J, Cacciatore B. Transvaginal power Doppler findings in laparoscopically proven acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.17, 233–238 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ectopic pregnancy – United States, 1990–1992. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.44, 46–48 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimes DA. Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.194, 92–94 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeldestad FE, Hadgu A, Eriksson N. Epidemiology of repeat ectopic pregnancy: a population-based prospective cohort study. Obstet. Gynecol.91, 129–135 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao M, Tulandi T. Current status of surgical and nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil. Steril.67, 421–433 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamwendo F, Forslin L, Bodin L, Danielsson D. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 year period and the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm. Infect.76, 28–32 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coste J, Job-Spira N, Fernandez H, Papiernik E, Spira A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case–control study in France, with special focus on infectious factors. Am. J. Epidemiol.133, 839–849 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow JM, Yonekura ML, Richwald GA, Greenland S, Sweet RL, Schachter J. The association between Chlamydia trachomatis and ectopic pregnancy. A matched-pair, case–control study. JAMA263, 3164–3167 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case–control, population-based study in France. Am. J. Epidemiol.157, 185–194 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N. Engl. J. Med.336, 762–767 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, Chittams J, Hummel AC, Shaunik A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil. Steril.86, 36–43 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang G, Levine D, Swire M, McNamara A, Mehta T. The intradecidual sign: is it reliable for diagnosis of early intrauterine pregnancy? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.183, 725–731 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley WG, Fiske CE, Filly RA. The double sac sign of early intrauterine pregnancy: use in exclusion of ectopic pregnancy. Radiology143, 223–226 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condous G, Timmerman D, Goldstein S, Valentin L, Jurkovic D, Bourne T. Pregnancies of unknown location: consensus statement. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.28, 121–122 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Guo W. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. Obstet. Gynecol.104, 50–55 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva C, Sammel MD, Zhou L, Gracia C, Hummel AC, Barnhart K. Human chorionic gonadotropin profile for women with ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol.107, 605–610 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCord ML, Muram D, Buster JE, Arheart KL, Stovall TG, Carson SA. Single serum progesterone as a screen for ectopic pregnancy: exchanging specificity and sensitivity to obtain optimal test performance. Fertil. Steril.66, 513–516 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A et al. The use of a new logistic regression model for predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location. Hum. Reprod.19, 1900–1910 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condous G, Van Calster B, Kirk E, Timmerman D, Van Huffel S, Bourne T. Prospective cross-validation of three methods of predicting failing pregnancies of unknown location. Hum. Reprod.22, 1156–1160 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condous G, Van Calster B, Kirk E et al. Prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.29, 680–687 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majmudar B, Henderson PH 3rd, Semple E. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a high-risk factor for tubal pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol.62, 73–78 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creasy JL, Clark RL, Cuttino JT, Groff TR. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: radiologic and clinical correlates. Radiology154, 597–600 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piacenza JM, Salsano F. Post-hysterectomy fallopian tube prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.98, 253–255 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YS, Kang JS, Park MH. Fallopian tube prolapse misdiagnosed as vault granulation tissue: a report of three cases. Pathol. Res. Pract.201, 819–822 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo KW, Law LW, Yip SK. The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of tubal prolapse: a 7 case series and literature review. Surg. Innov.14, 24–26 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Candini GB CA. Post-hysterectomy fallopian tube herniation: a report of two cases. J. Reprod. Med.41, 915–920 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma B, Preston J, Greenwood P, Oligbo N, Wilkinson M. Isolated torsion of the fallopian tube: two case reports. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.23, 329–330 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onuma O, Matthews G. Isolated torsion of the Fallopian tube. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol.40, 213–214(2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleischer AC, Stein SM, Cullinan JA, Warner MA. Color Doppler sonography of adnexal torsion. J. Ultrasound Med.14, 523–528 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters WA 3rd, Andersen WA, Hopkins MP, Kumar NB, Morley GW. Prognostic features of carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Obstet. Gynecol.71, 757–762 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baekelandt M, Jorunn Nesbakken A, Kristensen GB, Trope CG, Abeler VM. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Cancer89, 2076–2084 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt KA, Weiss NS, Schwartz SM. Incidence of malignant fallopian tube tumors. Gynecol. Oncol.35, 236–239 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brose MS, Rebbeck TR, Calzone KA, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Weber BL. Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program. J. Natl Cancer Inst.94, 1365–1372 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweemer RP, van Diest PJ, Verheijen RH et al. Molecular evidence linking primary cancer of the fallopian tube to BRCA1 germline mutations. Gynecol. Oncol.76, 45–50 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivier RI, van Beurden M, Lubsen MA et al. Clinical outcome of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers and events during follow-up. Br. J. Cancer90, 1492–1497 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart SL, Wike JM, Foster SL, Michaud F. The incidence of primary fallopian tube cancer in the United States. Gynecol. Oncol.107, 392–397 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patlas M, Rosen B, Chapman W, Wilson SR. Sonographic diagnosis of primary malignant tumors of the fallopian tube. Ultrasound Q20, 59–64 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haratz-Rubinstein N, Russell B, Gal D. Sonographic diagnosis of Fallopian tube carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.24, 86–88 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shalan H, Sosic A, Kurjak A. Fallopian tube carcinoma: recent diagnostic approach by color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.2, 297–299 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Ilijas M, Sparac V, Kosuta D. Preoperative diagnosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol.68, 29–34 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Jacobs I. Preoperative diagnosis of the primary fallopian tube carcinoma by three-dimensional static and power Doppler sonography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.15, 246–251 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar