Motile sperm organelle morphology examination: where do we stand 12 years later?

References

• Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 340(8810), 17–18 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy ZP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC. Special applications of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the influence of sperm count, motility, morphology, source and sperm antibody on the outcome of ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 13(Suppl. 1), 143–154 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oehninger S, Chaturvedi S, Toner J et al. Semen quality: is there a paternal effect on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Hum. Reprod. 13(8), 2161–2164 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tasdemir I, Tasdemir M, Tavukçuoglu S, Kahraman S, Biberoglu K. Effect of abnormal sperm head morphology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans. Hum. Reprod. 12(6), 1214–1217 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 79(1), 42–48 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 17(1), 184–189 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemes EH, Rawe YV. Sperm pathology: a step beyond descriptive morphology. Origin, characterization and fertility potential of abnormal sperm phenotypes in infertile men. Hum. Reprod. Update 9(5), 405–428 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen SW, Leader A, White RR et al. A comprehensive assessment of outcomes in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 150(2), 160–165 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindryckx A, Peeraer K, Debrock S et al. Has the prevalence of congenital abnormalities after intracytoplasmic sperm injection increased? The Leuven data 1994–2000 and a review of the literature. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 70(1), 11–22 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(19), 1803–1813 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 97(6), 1331.e1–1337.e1 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N. Engl. J. Med. 345(14), 1067–1068 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J. Androl. 23(1), 1–8 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco JG Jr, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Oliveira JB, Vagnini L. Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Reprod. Biomed. Online 17(1), 42–45 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach M, Neyer A, Stecher A et al. Morphological integrity of human sperm nuclei and blastocyst formation after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Hum. Reprod. 22(Suppl. 1), i108–i109 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Garolla A, Fortini D, Menegazzo M et al. High-power microscopy for selecting spermatozoa for ICSI by physiological status. Reprod. Biomed. Online 17(5), 610–616 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermondade N, Vialard F, Bergère M et al. [Evaluation of the contribution of the observation method of sperm in ICSI magnification]. Andrologie 17, 212–221 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mauri AL, Oliveira JB, Baruffi RL et al. Significance of extruded nuclear chromatin (regional nuclear shape malformation) in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Int. J. Androl. 34(6 Pt 1), 594–599 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, Setti AS, Figueira RC et al. Sperm organelle morphologic abnormalities: contributing factors and effects on intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles outcomes. Urology 78(4), 786–791 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David G, Bisson JP, Czyglik F, Jouannet P, Gernigon C. [Morphological anomalies of human spermatozoa. 1) Proposals for a classification system]. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 4, 7–36 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Auger J, Eustache F. [Standardisation of the morphological classification of human spermatozoa according to the modified method of David]. Andrologie 10, 358–373 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Saidi R, Rives N, Gruel E, Mazurier S, Mousset-Simeon N, Mace B. [New classification of spermatocytogram at high magnification]. Med. Repro. Gyn. Endo. 10, 315–324 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Vanderzwalmen P, Hiemer A, Rubner P et al. Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod. Biomed. Online 17(5), 617–627 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM et al. A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil. Steril. 92(5), 1616–1625 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdrix A, Saïdi R, Ménard JF et al. Relationship between conventional sperm parameters and motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). Int. J. Androl. 35(4), 491–498 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Moyer G, Louison M et al. [Influence of man’s age on the presence of vacuoles in the sperm head: evaluation at high magnification by ultra-morphology of spermatozoa]. 15èmes Journées Nationales de la FFER 1, 57–59 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Silva LF, Oliveira JB, Petersen CG et al. The effects of male age on sperm analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 10, 19 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe S, Tanaka A, Fujii S et al. An investigation of the potential effect of vacuoles in human sperm on DNA damage using a chromosome assay and the TUNEL assay. Hum. Reprod. 26(5), 978–986 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Baruffi RL et al. Correlation between semen analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination and sperm DNA damage. Fertil. Steril. 94(5), 1937–1940 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira JB, Petersen CG, Massaro FC et al. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME): intervariation study of normal sperm and sperm with large nuclear vacuoles. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 8, 56 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Foll N, Siffroi JP, Chantot-Bastaraud S, Cassuto G, Pornoi MF, Joyé N. [Relation between sperm head morphology observed at high magnification (6100x) and meiotic segregation profile]. 15èmes Journées Nationales de la FFER 1, 91–92 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Monqaut AL, Zavaleta C, López G, Lafuente R, Brassesco M. Use of high-magnification microscopy for the assessment of sperm recovered after two different sperm processing methods. Fertil. Steril. 95(1), 277–280 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum. Reprod. 5(5), 586–592 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Mauri AL et al. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination is stricter than Tygerberg criteria. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18(3), 320–326 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer S, Eltes F, Berkovitz A, Yehuda R, Itsykson P, Bartoov B. Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in vitro incubation at 37 degrees C? Fertil. Steril. 88(6), 1589–1594 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kacem O, Sifer C, Barraud-Lange V et al. Sperm nuclear vacuoles, as assessed by motile sperm organellar morphological examination, are mostly of acrosomal origin. Reprod. Biomed. Online 20(1), 132–137 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamboni L. The ultrastructural pathology of the spermatozoon as a cause of infertility: the role of electron microscopy in the evaluation of semen quality. Fertil. Steril. 48(5), 711–734 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman R, Gross L. The modulation contrast microscope. Nature 254(5501), 586–588 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montjean D, Belloc S, Benkhalifa M, Dalleac A, Ménézo Y. Sperm vacuoles are linked to capacitation and acrosomal status. Hum. Reprod. 27(10), 2927–2932 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perdrix A, Travers A, Chelli MH et al. Assessment of acrosome and nuclear abnormalities in human spermatozoa with large vacuoles. Hum. Reprod. 26(1), 47–58 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F, Petit JM et al. Large human sperm vacuoles observed in motile spermatozoa under high magnification: nuclear thumbprints linked to failure of chromatin condensation. Hum. Reprod. 26(7), 1650–1658 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorphin B, Lefevre M, Gout C, Oger P, Yazbeck C, Rougier N. Fine localization and characterization of some abnormalities observed in human sperm heads by interferential differential contrast. Hum. Reprod. 25, P-043 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H. Human sperm head vacuoles are physiological structures formed during the sperm development and maturation process. Fertil. Steril. 98(2), 315–320 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum. Reprod. Update 12(4), 417–435 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger J, Mesbah M, Huber C, Dadoune JP. Aniline blue staining as a marker of sperm chromatin defects associated with different semen characteristics discriminates between proven fertile and suspected infertile men. Int. J. Androl. 13(6), 452–462 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foresta C, Zorzi M, Rossato M, Varotto A. Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int. J. Androl. 15(4), 330–337 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iranpour FG, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Valojerdi MR, al-Taraihi TM. Chromomycin A3 staining as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 17(1), 60–66 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, Campana A, Sakkas D. Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2(3), 139–144 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil. Steril. 42(1), 87–91 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L et al. Evaluation of sperm’s chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 26(11–12), 591–596 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F, Vialard F et al. Characterization of large vacuoles observed in sperm head in MSOME. 15èmes Journées Nationales de la FFER 1, 34–35 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cassuto NG, Hazout A, Hammoud I et al. Correlation between DNA defect and sperm-head morphology. Reprod. Biomed. Online 24(2), 211–218 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco JG Jr, Mauri AL, Petersen CG et al. Large nuclear vacuoles are indicative of abnormal chromatin packaging in human spermatozoa. Int. J. Androl. 35(1), 46–51 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J. Cell Biol. 119(3), 493–501 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp. Cell Res. 207(1), 202–205 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D et al. Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. 15(4), 830–839 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding M, Coppola G, di Matteo L, Palagiano A, Fusco E, Dale B. Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 28(3), 253–262 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammoud I, Boitrelle F, Ferfouri F et al. Selection of normal spermatozoa with a vacuole-free head (x6300) improves selection of spermatozoa with intact DNA in patients with high sperm DNA fragmentation rates. Andrologia doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01328.x (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod. Biomed. Online 16(6), 835–841 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Baruffi RL, Franco JG Jr. Comparison of day 2 embryo quality after conventional ICSI versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) using sibling oocytes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 150(1), 42–46 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira Rde C, Braga DP, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Morphological nuclear integrity of sperm cells is associated with preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening cycle outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 95(3), 990–993 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum. Reprod. 20(1), 185–190 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, Peer S, Feldberg D, Bartoov B. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum. Reprod. 21(7), 1787–1790 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloc S, Benkhalifa M, Junca AM, Dumont M, Bacrie PC, Ménézo Y. Paternal age and sperm DNA decay: discrepancy between chromomycin and aniline blue staining. Reprod. Biomed. Online 19(2), 264–269 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes S, Jurisicova A, Sun JG, Casper RF. Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. 13(4), 896–900 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin A, Basinko A, Douet-Guilbert N et al. Aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in sperm of carriers of a constitutional chromosomal abnormality. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 133(2–4), 100–106 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D, Brinkworth M, Iles D. Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction 139(2), 287–301 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez K, Tomazevic T, Zorn B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improves development and quality of preimplantation embryos in teratozoospermia patients. Reprod. Biomed. Online 25(2), 168–179 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin A, Nguyen MH, Douet-Gilbert N, Morel F, De Braekeleer M. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: where are we 12 years later? Expert Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 8(3), 261–270 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Boughali H, Wittemer C, Viville S. [Importance of the analysis of the morphology and fine quality of sperm nuclear techniques in MPA]. Andrologie 16, 38–45 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Akl LD, Oliveira JB, Petersen CG et al. Efficacy of the motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) in predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 9, 120 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar