What is the best method for diagnosing glaucoma?

References

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol.90(3), 262–267 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochmann F, Azuara-Blanco A. Imaging technologies for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Eur. Ophthalmic Rev. (2010) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, Fechtner RD et al. Risk assessment in the management of patients with ocular hypertension. Am. J. Ophthalmol.138(3), 458–467 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Müller-Bergh JA, Schlötzer-Schrehardt UM, Naumann GO. Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.31(4), 736–744 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampel HD. Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc.99, 301–317 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma P, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Schuman JS. Diagnostic tools for glaucoma detection and management. Surv. Ophthalmol.53(Suppl. 1), S17–S32 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Laureano J. When is glaucoma really glaucoma? Clin. Exp. Optom.90(5), 376–385 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology99(1), 19–28 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Evaluating the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. II: Optical image analysis. Semin. Ophthalmol.15(4), 206–220 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM. New findings in the evaluation of the optic disc in glaucoma diagnosis. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.18(2), 122–128 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth GL, Lopes JF, Junk AK, Grigorian AP, Henderer J. Systems for staging the amount of optic nerve damage in glaucoma: a critical review and new material. Surv. Ophthalmol.51(4), 293–315 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol.120(6), 701–713 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe’ E, Gomarasca S, Vavassori M, Orzalesi N. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields Regression Analysis of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Am. J. Ophthalmol.136(1), 26–33 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.41(7), 1730–1742 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF. New developments in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph for glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.19(2), 141–148 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Beiser JA et al. Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch. Ophthalmol.123(9), 1188–1197 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd C, Balasubramanian M, Weinreb RN et al. Performance of confocal scanning laser tomograph topographic change analysis (TCA) for assessing glaucomatous progression. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.50, 691–701 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chauhan B, McCormick T, Nicolela M, LeBlanc R. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch. Ophthalmol.119, 1492–1499 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal DS, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, Bunce C. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol.83, 290–294 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangwill LM, Chan K, Bowd C et al. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.45(9), 3144–3151 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreras A, Pajarín AB, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Honrubia FM. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields Regression Analysis. Ophthalmology114(11), 1981–1987 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Dreher AW, Coleman A, Quigley H, Shaw B, Reiter K. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch. Ophthalmol.108(4), 557–560 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemij HG, Reus NJ. New developments in scanning laser polarimetry for glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.19(2), 136–140 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Zhang Z et al. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46(4), 1322–1329 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatrica96(5), 644–647 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essock EA, Sinai MJ, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Fourier analysis of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol.121(9), 1238–1245 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Bernd AS, Weinreb RN. Fourier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry measurements with variable corneal compensation in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44(6), 2606–2612 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol.122(6), 827–837 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol.139(6), 1010–1018 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth M, Holló G. Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation pattern. Br. J. Ophthalmol.89(9), 1139–1142 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus NJ, Zhou Q, Lemij HG. Enhanced imaging algorithm for scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.47(9), 3870–3877 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai TA, Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Diagnostic accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced versus variable corneal compensation. Ophthalmology144, 1988–1993 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Patel C, Weinreb RN. Detection of glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.48, 3146–3153 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehi M, Guaqueta DC, Feuer WJ, Greenfield DS; Advanced Imaging Study Group. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am. J. Ophthalmol.143, 272–279 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zangwill LM, Bowd C. Retinal nerve fiber layer analysis in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.17(2), 120–131 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J, Katz J. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology112(1), 3–9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essock EA, Zheng Y, Gunvant P. Analysis of GDx-VCC polarimetry data by Wavelet–Fourier analysis across glaucoma stages. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46, 2838–2847 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunvant P, Zheng Y, Essock EA et al. Application of shape-based analysis methods to OCT retinal nerve fiber layer data in glaucoma. J. Glaucoma16, 543–548 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunvant P, Zheng Y, Essock EA et al. Comparison of shape-based analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer data obtained from OCT and GDx-VCC. J. Glaucoma18, 464–471 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourne RR, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Jahanbakhsh K, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46(4), 1280–1285 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanamori A, Escano MF, Eno A et al. Evaluation of the effect of aging on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica217(4), 273–278 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Tannenbaum DP, Law SK, Caprioli J. Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol.137(2), 228–235 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with Stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology115, 661–666 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budenz DL, Chang RT, Huang X, Knighton RW, Tielsch JM. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness measurements using the Stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46, 2440–2443 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman JS, Wollstein G, Farra T et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology103, 1889–1898 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.45(6), 1716–1724 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Chu T et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.46(11), 4147–4152 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna R Jr, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol.139(1), 44–55 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, Beaton SA, Schuman JS. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am. J. Ophthalmol.139(1), 39–43 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and automated visual fields. Am. J. Ophthalmol.138(2), 218–225 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan DF, Mieler WF, Hariprasad SM. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a comparison of modern high-resolution retinal imaging systems. Am. J. Ophthalmol.149, 18–31 (2010)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn FK, Mardin CY, Laemmer R et al. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.50(5), 1971–1977 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.41(3), 741–748 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma Acta Ophthalmol. Scand.76(3), 268–272 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M et al. Sensitivity of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology107(7), 1303–1308 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Martinez A, Sanchez M, Mesa C, Cordoves L, Losada MJ. Accuracy of the tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in the Octopus 1–2–3 perimeter. In: Perimetry Update 1996/1997. Wall M, Wild J (Eds). Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 119–123 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Morales J, Weitzman ML, González de la Rosa M. Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and Octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology107(1), 134–142 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Garcia Feijoo J, Morales J, Azuara-Blanco A. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of tendency oriented perimetry in glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol.16(2), 259–267 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sample PA, Chauhan BC, Araie M, Johnson CA. Comparison of functional methods. In: Glaucoma Diagnosis: Structure and Function: Consensus Series 1. Robert NW, Erik LG (Eds). Kugler Publications, The Hague, The Netherlands, 119–126 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dacey DM, Packer OS. Colour coding in the primate retina: diverse cell types and cone-specific circuitry. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.13(4), 421–427 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin PR, White AJ, Goodchild AK, Wilder HD, Sefton AE. Evidence that blue-on cells are part of the third geniculocortical pathway in primates. Eur. J. Neurosci.9(7), 1536–1541 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch. Ophthalmol.111(5), 645–650 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sample PA, Taylor JD, Martinez GA, Lusky M, Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am. J. Ophthalmol.115(2), 225–233 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Arch. Ophthalmol.111(5), 651–656 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Berry CC et al. Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals. Ophthalmology110(10), 1895–1902 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Progressive color visual field loss in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.33(6), 2068–2071 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA. Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.13(2), 77–84 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43(2), 322–331 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata LM, DeLeón-Ortega J, Girkin CA. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.18(2), 115–121 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racette L, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Ng D, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24–22 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.49(3), 954–960 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alward WLM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am. J. Ophthalmol.129(3), 376–378 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel SC, Friedman DS, Varadkar P, Robin AL. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol.129(3), 323–327 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am. J. Ophthalmol.129, 314–322 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendrick AM. Recent developments in perimetry: test stimuli and procedures. Clin. Exp. Optom.88(2), 73–80 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43(3), 709–715 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Kunimatsu S, Araie M, Iwase A, Tomita G. Frequency doubling technology and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopic optic disc analysis in open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defects. J. Glaucoma10(4), 256–260 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry. Optom. Vis. Sci.82, 981–987 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 4787–4795 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman SE, Trick GL, Hart WM Jr. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.31(4), 722–729 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J. Neurosci.7(11), 3416–3468 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science240(4853), 740–749 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunsell JHR, Newsome WT. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Ann. Rev. Neurosci.10, 363–401 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapley R, Perry VH. Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends Neurosci.9, 229–235 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi N, Hedley-Whyte ET, Dreyer EB. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol.116(2), 182–188 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mardin CY, Peters A, Horn F, Jünemann AG, Lausen B. Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements. J. Glaucoma15(4), 299–305 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA et al. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology113(9), 1593–1602 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar