iStent^®: trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma

References

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol.90, 262–267 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traverso CE, Walt JG, Kelly SP et al. Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe. Br. J. Ophthalmol.89(10), 1245–1249 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thygesen J, Aagren M, Arnavielle S et al. Late-stage, primary open-angle glaucoma in Europe: social and health care maintenance costs and quality of life of patients from 4 countries. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.24(6), 1763–1770 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rylander NR, Vold SD. Cost analysis of glaucoma medications. Am. J. Ophthalmol.145, 106–113 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick KD, Foster A. The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated. Am. J. Ophthalmol.135, 471–476 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant WM. Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes. Arch. Ophthalmol.69, 783–801 (1962).
   Google Scholar
• Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R. What increases outflow resistance in primary open-angle glaucoma? Surv. Ophthalmol.52, S101–S104 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brubaker RF. Introduction: three targets for glaucoma management. Surv. Ophthalmol.48, S1–S2 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Hyman L et al. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology114, 205–209 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J. Glaucoma9, 134–142 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL et al. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology111, 1627–1635 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch. Ophthalmol.120, 1268–1279 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Preferred Practice Pattern. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Treatment principles and options – general principles of glaucoma treatment. In: Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. The European Glaucoma Society (3rd Edition). Heijl A, Traverso CE (Eds). Dogma s.r.l., Savona, Italy, 117–118 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Treatment principles and options – antiglaucoma drugs. In: Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. The European Glaucoma Society (3rd Edition). Heijl A, Traverso CE (Eds). Dogma s.r.l., Savona, Italy, 122–143 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Treatment principles and options – adherence, compliance and persistence in glaucoma. In: Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. The European Glaucoma Society (3rd Edition). Heijl A, Traverso CE (Eds). Dogma s.r.l., Savona, Italy, 144–145 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E et al. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.140, 598–606 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath B, Robin AL, Covert D et al. Patient-reported behavior and problems in using glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology113, 431–436 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosaed S, Dustin L, Minckler DS. Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc.107, 127–133 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Realini T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review. J. Glaucoma17, 497–502 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The AGIS Investigators. The advanced glaucoma intervention study, 8: risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy. Arch. Ophthalmol.119, 1771–1779 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye16, 297–303 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBry PW, Perkihns TW, Heatley G et al. Incidence of late-onset bleb-related complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin. Arch. Ophthalmol.120, 297–300 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng JW, Xi GL, Wei RL et al. Efficacy and tolerability of nonpenetrating filtering surgery in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmologica224, 138–146 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenquist R, Epstein D, Melamed S et al. Outflow resistance of enucleated human eyes at two different perfusion pressures and different extents of trabeculotomy. Curr. Eye Res.8, 1233–1240 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahler C, Smedley G, Zhou J, Johnson D. Trabecular bypass stents decrease intraocular pressure in cultured human anterior segments. Am. J. Ophthalmol.138, 988–994 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shingleton BJ, Gamell LS, O’Donoghue MW et al. Long-term changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: normal patients versus glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.25, 885–890 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DD, Doyle JW, Smith MF. Intraocular pressure reduction following phacoemulsification cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers30, 37–40 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.27, 1779–1786 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW. Long-term effects of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in normotensive and ocular hypertensive eyes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.34, 735–742 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku CH, Pioletti DP, Browne M, Gregson PJ. Effect of different Ti-6Al-4V surface treatments on osteoblasts behavior. Biomaterials23, 1447–1454 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Smedley GT. Trabecular bypass: effect of Schlemm canal and collector channel dilation. J. Glaucoma15, 446–455 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law SK, Modjtahedi SP, Mansury A, Caprioli J. Intermediate-term comparison of trabeculectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C between Asian American and Caucasian glaucoma patients: a case-controlled comparison. Eye (Lond.)21, 71–78 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shigeeda T, Tomidokoro A, Chen YN, Shirato S, Araie M. Long-term follow-up of initial trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese patients. J. Glaucoma15, 195–199 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou J, Smedley GT. A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis. J. Glaucoma14, 74–83 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traverso CE, De Feo F; GC001A Study Group. Refractory open-angle glaucoma: 24-month results of a trabecular micro-bypass stent. Presented at: AAO Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, USA, 25 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T et al. CoexiStent® primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: interim analysis of a trabecular micro-bypass stent and concurrent cataract surgery. Eur. J. Ophthalmol.19, 393–399 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle E, Zeyen T, Stalmans I. The iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent: a case series. Bull. Soc. Belge. Ophtalmol.311, 23–29 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Nagi A, Tam DY, Ahmed IK. Multiple iStent® implantation in Schlemm canal combined with phacoemulsification. Presented at: ASCRS Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–8 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW. Prospective, randomized trial of cataract surgery with iStent® implantation and cataract surgery alone in mild-moderate open-angle glaucoma. Presented at: AAO Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, USA, 27 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fea AM. Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.36, 407–412 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Barrientos Y, García-Feijoó J, Martinez de la Casa JM, Pablo LE, Fernández-Pérez C, García Sánchez J. Fluorophotometric study of the effect of the Glaukos trabecular micro-bypass stent on acqueous humor dynamics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Jung J, Francis BA. Ab interno trabeculotomy: Trabectome™ surgical treatment for open-angle glaucoma. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol.4(2), 119–128 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical study analysis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 1217–1226 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar