Peek a peak: a glance at statistics for quantitative label-free proteomics

References

• Conrad DH, Goyette J, Thomas PS. Proteomics as a method for early detection of cancer: a review of proteomics exhaled breath condensate, and lung cancer screening. J. Gen. Intern. Med.23 Suppl. 1, 78–84 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravatt BF, Simon GM, Yates JR 3rd. The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature450(7172), 991–1000 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifai N, Gillette MA, Carr SA. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol.24(8), 971–983 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyers CL. The cancer biomarker problem. Nature452(7187), 548–552 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteoliva L, Albar JP. Differential proteomics: an overview of gel and non-gel based approaches. Brief. Funct. Genomic Proteomic3(3), 220–239 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klose J, Kobalz U. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: an updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis16(6), 1034–1059 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose J. Large-gel 2-D electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol.112, 147–172 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature422(6928), 198–207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, You J, Bemis KG, Tegeler TJ, Brown DP. Label-free mass spectrometry-based protein quantification technologies in proteomic analysis. Brief. Funct. Genomic Proteomic7(5), 329–339 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol.1(5), 252–262 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz B, Meyer HE. Approaches for the quantification of protein concentration ratios. Proteomics3(11), 2208–2220 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putz S, Reinders J, Reinders Y, Sickmann A. Mass spectrometry-based peptide quantification: applications and limitations. Expert Rev. Proteomics2(3), 381–392 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebeler R, Oeljeklaus S, Reidegeld KA et al. Study of early leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana by quantitative proteomics using reciprocal 14N/15N labeling and difference gel electrophoresis. Mol. Cell Proteomics7(1), 108–120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese S, Reidegeld KA, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics7(3), 340–350 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelius D, Bondarenko PV. Quantitative profiling of proteins in complex mixtures using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res.1(4), 317–323 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener MC, Sachs JR, Deyanova EG, Yates NA. Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures. Anal. Chem.76(20), 6085–6096 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listgarten J, Emili A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics4(4), 419–434 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Denny R, Dorschel CA et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem.77(7), 2187–2200 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond AI, Mann M. Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res.12(8), 1231–1245 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.76(14), 4193–4201 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(10), 1487–1502 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii AI. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(12), 2373–2385 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 117–124 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(10), 1419–1440 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl M, Redlich G, Eisenacher M et al. Automated calculation of unique peptide sequences for unambiguous identification of highly homolgous proteins by mass spectrometry. J. Proteomics Bioinform.1(1), 6–10 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Alexandridou A, Tsangaris GT, Vougas K, Nikita K, Spyrou G. UniMaP: finding unique mass and peptide signatures in the human proteome. Bioinformatics25(22), 3035–3037 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Zhang H, Ranish JA, Aebersold R. Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.75(23), 6648–6657 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Liu H, Sadygov R, Yates JR 3rd. A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Anal. Chem.75(24), 6912–6921 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domon B, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science312(5771), 212–217 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet359(9306), 572–577 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF 3rd, Ornstein DK, Paweletz CP et al. Serum proteomic patterns for detection of prostate cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst.94(20), 1576–1578 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilien RH, Farid H, Donald BR. Probabilistic disease classification of expression-dependent proteomic data from mass spectrometry of human serum. J. Comput. Biol.10(6), 925–946 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listgarten J, Neal RM, Roweis ST, Wong P, Emili A. Difference detection in LC-MS data for protein biomarker discovery. Bioinformatics23(2), e198–e204 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher O, Reinert K, Gropl C et al. TOPP – the OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics23(2), e191–e197 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang W, Zhou H, Lin H et al. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal. Chem.75(18), 4818–4826 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay VJ, Bonner RF, Hamilton IP. Application of wavelet transforms to experimental spectra: smoothing, denoising, and data set compression. Anal. Chem.69(1), 78–90 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Yi EC, Kemp CJ, Zhang H, Aebersold R. A software suite for the generation and comparison of peptide arrays from sets of data collected by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1328–1340 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radulovic D, Jelveh S, Ryu S et al. Informatics platform for global proteomic profiling and biomarker discovery using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(10), 984–997 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy K, Fasulo D. Improved model-based, platform-independent feature extraction for mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics23(19), 2528–2535 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CA, Want EJ, O’Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem.78(3), 779–787 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui Y, McLerran D, Adam BL et al. An automated peak identification/calibration procedure for high-dimensional protein measures from mass spectrometers. J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2003(4), 242–248 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris JS, Coombes KR, Koomen J, Baggerly KA, Kobayashi R. Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum. Bioinformatics21(9), 1764–1775 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du P, Kibbe WA, Lin SM. Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching. Bioinformatics22(17), 2059–2065 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellew M, Coram M, Fitzgibbon M et al. A suite of algorithms for the comprehensive analysis of complex protein mixtures using high-resolution LC-MS. Bioinformatics22(15), 1902–1909 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs RE, Knierman MD, Gelfanova V, Butler JP, Hale JE. Comprehensive label-free method for the relative quantification of proteins from biological samples. J. Proteome Res.4(4), 1442–1450 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Rinner O, Schmidt A et al. SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics7(19), 3470–3480 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lange E, Gropl C, Schulz-Trieglaff O et al. A geometric approach for the alignment of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics23(13), i273–i281 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Christin C, Smilde AK, Hoefsloot HC et al. Optimized time alignment algorithm for LC-MS data: correlation optimized warping using component detection algorithm-selected mass chromatograms. Anal. Chem.80(18), 7012–7021 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Tang H, Fitzgibbon MP et al. A statistical method for chromatographic alignment of LC-MS data. Biostatistics8(2), 357–367 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen N-PV, Carstensen JM, Smedsgaard J. Aligning of single and multiple wavelength chromatographic profiles for chemometric data analysis using correlation optimised warping. J. Chromatogr. A805, 17–35 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nederkassel AM, Daszykowski M, Eilers PH, Heyden YV. A comparison of three algorithms for chromatograms alignment. J. Chromatogr. A1118(2), 199–210 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylund D, Danielsson R, Malmquist G, Markides KE. Chromatographic alignment by warping and dynamic programming as a pre-processing tool for PARAFAC modelling of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data. J. Chromatogr. A961(2), 237–244 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suits F, Lepre J, Du P, Bischoff R, Horvatovich P. Two-dimensional method for time aligning liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data. Anal. Chem.80(9), 3095–3104 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadygov RG, Maroto FM, Huhmer AF. ChromAlign: a two-step algorithmic procedure for time alignment of three-dimensional LC-MS chromatographic surfaces. Anal. Chem.78(24), 8207–8217 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Asara JM, Adamec J, Ouzzani M, Elmagarmid AK. Data pre-processing in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Bioinformatics21(21), 4054–4059 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podwojski K, Fritsch A, Chamrad DC et al. Retention time alignment algorithms for LC/MS data must consider non-linear shifts. Bioinformatics25(6), 758–764 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Grossmann J, Roth V et al. Semi-supervised LC/MS alignment for differential proteomics. Bioinformatics22(14), e132–e140 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbogaert M, Li-Thiao-Te S, Kaltenbach HM et al. Alignment of LC-MS images, with applications to biomarker discovery and protein identification. Proteomics8(4), 650–672 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics19(2), 185–193 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister SJ, Barry RC, Adkins JN et al. Normalization approaches for removing systematic biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics. J. Proteome Res.5(2), 277–286 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kultima K, Nilsson A, Scholz B et al. Development and evaluation of normalization methods for label-free relative quantification of endogenous peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(10), 2285–2295 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics17(6), 520–525 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung K, Gannoun A, Sitek B et al. Statistical evaluation of methods for the analysis of dynamic protein expression data from a tumor study. REVSTAT Stat. J.4(1), 67–80 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jung K, Gannoun A, Sitek B et al. Analysis of dynamic protein expression data. REVSTAT Stat. J.3(2), 99–111 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Brusniak MY, Bodenmiller B, Campbell D et al. Corra: computational framework and tools for LC-MS discovery and targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics9, 542 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol.5(10), R80 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt DF, Buko AM, Ballard JM, Shabanowitz J, Giordani AB. Sequence analysis of polypeptides by collision activated dissociation on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Biomed. Mass Spectrom.8(9), 397–408 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt DF, Yates JR 3rd, Shabanowitz J, Winston S, Hauer CR. Protein sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA83(17), 6233–6237 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR 3rd. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spetrom.5, 976–989 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis20(18), 3551–3567 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenyo D, Beavis RC. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem.75(4), 768–774 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geer LY, Markey SP, Kowalak JA et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res.3(5), 958–964 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boguski MS, McIntosh MW. Biomedical informatics for proteomics. Nature422(6928), 233–237 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson SD. Data analysis – the Achilles heel of proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.21(3), 221–222 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Vitek O, Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(10), 787–797 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidegeld KA, Eisenacher M, Kohl M et al. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications. Proteomics8(6), 1129–1137 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(3), 207–214 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem.74(20), 5383–5392 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 40–44 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersey PJ, Duarte J, Williams A et al. The International Protein Index: an integrated database for proteomics experiments. Proteomics4(7), 1985–1988 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black DL. Protein diversity from alternative splicing: a challenge for bioinformatics and post-genome biology. Cell103(3), 367–370 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl M, Schönebeck B, May C et al. Protein List Comparator (ProLiC): a framework for comparison of protein lists. Clin. Proteomics5(Suppl. 1, PosterC545), 104 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.75(17), 4646–4658 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol.19(3), 242–247 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang JX, Ginanni N, Dongre AR, Hefta SA, Opitek GJ. Biomarker discovery in urine by proteomics. J. Proteome Res.1(2), 161–169 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Opiteck GJ, Friedrichs MS, Dongre AR, Hefta SA. Changes in the protein expression of yeast as a function of carbon source. J. Proteome Res.2(6), 643–649 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, VerBerkmoes NC, Langston MA et al. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res.5(11), 2909–2918 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allet N, Barrillat N, Baussant T et al.In vitro and in silico processes to identify differentially expressed proteins. Proteomics4(8), 2333–2351 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colinge J, Chiappe D, Lagache S, Moniatte M, Bougueleret L. Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. Anal. Chem.77(2), 596–606 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T et al. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell Proteomics4(9), 1265–1272 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudoit S, Yang YH, Callow MJ, Speed TP. Statistical methods for identifying differentialy espressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Stat. Sin.12, 111–139 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(16), 9440–9445 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudoit S, Shaffer JP, Boldrick JC. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Stat. Sci.18(1), 71–103 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung K, Poschmann G, Podwojski K et al. Adjusted confidence intervals for the expression change of proteins observed in 2-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. J. Proteomics Bioinform.2(2), 78–87 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Xia Q, Wang T, Park Y, Lamont RJ, Hackett M. Differential quantitative proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis by linear ion trap mass spectrometry: non-label methods comparison, q-values and LOWESS curve fitting. Int. J. Mass Spectrom.259(1–3), 105–116 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin S, Daly DS, Springer DL, Miller JH. The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 164–169 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuster B, Schirle M, Mallick P, Aebersold R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.6(7), 577–583 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 125–131 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar