Image-guided brachytherapy for cervix cancer: from Manchester to Melbourne

References

• Nag S, Erickson B, Thomadsen B, Orton C, Demanes JD, Petereit D. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.48(1), 201–211 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Allen D, Narayan K. Managing advanced-stage cervical cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.19(4), 591–609 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynaecology. In: ICRU Report 38. Bethesda, MD, USA (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Toita T. Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol.14(1), 25–30 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rath GK, Sharma DN, Julka PK. ICRU report 38: has the radiation oncology community accepted it? International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.)14(5), 430–431 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Potter R, Van Limbergen E, Gerstner N, Wambersie A. Survey of the use of the ICRU 38 in recording and reporting cervical cancer brachytherapy. Radiother. Oncol.58(1), 11–18 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viani GA, Manta GB, Stefano EJ, de Fendi LI. Brachytherapy for cervix cancer: low-dose rate or high-dose rate brachytherapy – a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.28, 47 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Teshima T, Inoue T, Ikeda H et al. High-dose rate and low-dose rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Final results of Osaka University Hospital. Cancer72(8), 2409–2414 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava S. Comparing low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix: results from a randomized controlled study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.66(3), S42 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Patel FD, Sharma SC, Negi PS, Ghoshal S, Gupta BD. Low dose rate vs. high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.28(2), 335–341 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertsanguansinchai P, Lertbutsayanukul C, Shotelersuk K et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.59(5), 1424–1431 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hareyama M, Sakata K, Oouchi A et al. High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized trial. Cancer94(1), 117–124 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag S, Cardenes H, Chang S et al. Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.60(4), 1160–1172 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO Working Group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother. Oncol.78(1), 67–77 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haie-Meder C, Potter R, Van Limbergen E et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother. Oncol.74(3), 235–245 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag S. Controversies and new developments in gynecologic brachytherapy: image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma. Semin. Radiat. Oncol.16(3), 164–167 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter R, Fidarova E, Kirisits C, Dimopoulos J. Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix carcinoma. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.)20(6), 426–432 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter R, Dimopoulos J, Georg P et al. Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. Radiother. Oncol.83(2), 148–155 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter R, Kirisits C, Fidarova EF et al. Present status and future of high-precision image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix carcinoma. Acta Oncol.47(7), 1325–1336 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyk S, Narayan K, Fisher R, Bernshaw D. Conformal brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer using transabdominal ultrasound. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.75(1), 64–70 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan K, Fisher RJ, Bernshaw D. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by magnetic resonance imaging and treated with curative intent. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer18(3), 525–533 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Narayan K, McKenzie A, Fisher R, Susil B, Jobling T, Bernshaw D. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Clin. Oncol.26(5), e163–e168 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Narayan K, Hicks RJ, Jobling T, Bernshaw D, McKenzie AF. A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: potential impact on treatment. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer11(4), 263–271 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan K, Fisher RJ, Bernshaw D, Shakher R, Hicks RJ. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography and treated with curative intent. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer19(5), 912–918 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Narayan K, Fisher R, Bernshaw D. Significance of tumor volume and corpus uteri invasion in cervical cancer patients treated by radiotherapy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer16(2), 623–630 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan K. Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer15(4), 573–582 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narayan K, van Dyk S, Bernshaw D, Rajasooriyar C, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. Comparative study of LDR (Manchester system) and HDR image-guided conformal brachytherapy of cervical cancer: patterns of failure, late complications, and survival. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.74(5), 1529–1535 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• van Dyk S, Bernshaw D. Ultrasound-based conformal planning for gynaecological brachytherapy. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol.52(1), 77–84 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin LL, Mutic S, Low DA et al. Adaptive brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer using FDG-PET. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.67(1), 91–96 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar