Advances in fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer

References

• Arbyn M, Autier P, Ferlay J et al. Burden of cervical cancer in the 27 member states of the European Union: estimates for 2004. Ann. Oncol.18(8), 1423–1425 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML et al. A fertility sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible? Gynecol. Oncol.95(3), 534–538 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson M, Saraiya M, Benard V et al. Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer113(Suppl. 10), 2855–2864 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargent D, Burn JL, Roy M, Remi I. Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.52, 105 (1994) (Abstract 14).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider A, Krause N, Kuhne-Heid R, Noschel H. Preserving fertility in early cervix carcinoma: trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. Zentralbl Gynaekol.118(1), 6–8 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Roy M, Plante M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.179(6), 1491–1496 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd JH, Crawford RA, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy: a way to preserve fertility in the treatment of early cervical cancer. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.105(8), 912–916 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J et al. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA–B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer86(11), 2273–2279 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Boyle DC, Corless DJ et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.104(10), 1196–1200 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JH, Park JY, Kim DY et al. Fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for young women with early stage cervical cancer. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.117(3), 340–347 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Torrent A. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy: surgical technique and outcome. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.17(1), 37–41 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cibula D, Ungar L, Palfalvi L et al. Laparoscopic abdominal radical trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.97(2), 707–709 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Malpiga A, Soliman PT. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.116(3), 512–515 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 564–567 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Charvát M, Robová H et al. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer17(1), 304–310 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landoni F, Parma G, Peiretti M et al. Chemo-conization in early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.107, S125–S126 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plante M, Lau S, Brydon L et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy in bulky stage 1B1 cervical cancer: case report. Gynecol. Oncol.101(2), 367–370 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robova H, Pluta M, Hrehorcak M et al. High dose density chemotherapy followed by simple trachelectomy: full-term pregnancy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer.18(6), 1367–1371 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneo A, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Mangioni C. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery for stage 1B1 cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 438–443 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update. Gynecol. Oncol.111, S105–S110 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter J, Sonoda Y, Chi DS et al. Radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer: Postoperative physical and emotional adjustment concerns. Gynecol. Oncol.111(1), 151–157 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd JH, Spencer C, Herod J et al. A radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113(6), 719–724 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mathevet P, Laszlo de Kaszon E, Dargent D. Fertility preservation in early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.31(9), 706–712 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Zivanovic O, Leitao MM, Park JK et al. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of outcome, recurrence pattern and the impact of platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Gynecol. Oncol.112(3), 590–593 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh N, Arif S. Histopathologic parameters of prognosis in cervical cancer – a review. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer14(5), 741–750 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppercorn PD, Jeyrajah AR, Woolas R et al. Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience. Radiology212(2), 395–399 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Wenaden AE et al. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer17(3), 629–636 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Pluta M, Strnad P et al. A less radical treatment option to the fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111, S116–S120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken D, Shepherd JH. Fertility preserving surgery for carcinoma of the cervix. Curr. Opin. Oncol.20(5), 575–580 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Souza NM, Dina R, McIndoe A et al. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension. Gynecol. Oncol.102(1), 80–85 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ et al. Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by/18F/-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer104(11), 2484–2491 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani NG et al. Diagnostic performance of nano particle-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.23(12), 2813–2821 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Strnad P, Robova H et al. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.98(2), 281–288 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M, Renaud MC, Tetu B et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.91(3), 494–503 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marnitz S, Kohler CH, Bongardt S et al. Topographic distribution of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.103(1), 35–44 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenevert J, Tetu B, Plante M et al. Indication and method of frozen section in vaginal radical trachelectomy. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol.28(5), 480–488 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Burnett AF, Roman LD, O’Meara AT et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol.88(3), 419–423 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Carter J et al. Initial experience with Dargent’s operation: the radical vaginal trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.108(2), 214–219 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pahisa J, Alonso I, Torné A. Vaginal approaches to fertility-sparing surgery in invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.110, S29–S32 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xu H, Zhang Q et al. A fertility-preserving option in early cervical carcinoma: laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. Biol.136(1), 90–93 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchiole P, Benchaib M, Buenerd A et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent’s operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol. Oncol.106(1), 132–141 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hertel H, Köhler C, Grund D et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: prospective multicentre study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.103(3), 506–511 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserni G. A model for determining the optimum histology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. J. Clin. Pathol.57(5), 467–471 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn T, Bembenek A, Decker T et al. A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance. Cancer103(3), 451–461 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N et al. Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology. J. Clin. Pathol.57(7), 695–701 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RG, Granai CO, Gajewski W et al. Pathologic evaluation of inguinal sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer patients: a comparison of immunohistochemical staining versus ultrastaging with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Gynecol. Oncol.91(2), 378–382 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euscher ED, Malpica A, Atkinson EN et al. Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.32(9), 1336–1343 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M et al. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol. Oncol.113(2), 181–184 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fader AN, Edwards RP, Cost M et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment. Gynecol. Oncol.111(1), 13–17 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM et al. Oncology outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol.111(2), 255–260 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case–control study. Gynecol. Oncol.110(2), 168–171 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Rustum NR, Neubauer N, Sonoda Y et al. Surgical and pathological outcomes of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for FIGO stage 1B1 cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111(2), 261–264 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander-Sefre F, Chee N, Spencer C et al. Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.101(3), 450–454 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cibula D, Slama J, Fischerova D et al. Update on abdominal radical trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.111, S111–S115 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Selo-Ojeme DO, Ind T, Shepherd JH. Isthmic stenosis following radical trachelectomy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.22(3), 327–328 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Noyes N, Abu-Rustum NR, Ramirez PT et al. Options in the management of fertility-related issues after radical trachelectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.114(1), 117–120 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feratovic R, Lewin SN, Sonoda Y et al. Cytologic findings after fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Cancer114(1), 1–6 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ghorab Z, Ismiil N, Covens A et al. Postradical vaginal trachelectomy follow-up by isthmic–vaginal smear cytology: a 13-year audit. Diagn. Cytopathol.37(9), 641–646 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ungar I, Palfalvi I, Hogg R et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving option for women with early cervical cancer. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol.112(3), 366–369 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Jolley JA, Battista L, Wing DA. Management of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: case reports and systematic review of the literature. Am. J. Perinatol.24(9), 531–539 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M, Renaud MC, Hoskins IA et al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. A series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol.98(1), 3–10 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petignat P, Stan C, Megevand E et al. Pregnancy after trachelectomy: a high-risk condition of preterm delivery. Report of a case and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol.94(3), 575–577 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Plante M, Renaud MC, Harel F et al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An update series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol.94(3), 614–623 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd JH, Milliken DA. Conservative surgery for carcinoma of the cervix. Clin. Oncol.20(6), 395–400 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiner ME, Covens A. Surgery insight: radical vaginal trachelectomy as a method of fertility preservation for cervical cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol.4(6), 353–361 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnett AF. Radical trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: review of oncologic and obstetrical outcomes. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.18(1), 8–13 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Schlaerth AC. Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188(1), 29–34 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareja FR, Ramirez PT, Borrero FM et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer. A case series and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 555–560 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Olawaiye A, Del Carmen M, Tambouret R et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: success and pitfalls in a general gynecologic oncology practice. Gynecol. Oncol.112(3), 506–510 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibula D, Slama J, Svarovsky J et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy in fertility sparing treatment of early stages cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer19(8), 1407–1411 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini M, Barrett J, Seaword G et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients post radical trachelectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(5), 1378–1382 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar L, Palfalvi L, Smith JR et al. Update on and long term follow-up of 91 abdominal radical trachelectomies. Gynecol. Oncol.101, 20 (2006) (Abstract 42).
   Google Scholar
• Nishio H, Fujii T, Kameyama K et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Gynecol. Oncol.115(1), 51–55 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wan XP, Yan Q, Xi XW et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: two new surgical techniques for the conservation of uterine arteries. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer16(4), 1698–1704 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J et al. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix? Gynecol. Oncol.84(1), 145–149 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney WK, Hodge DO, Egorshin EV et al. Identification of a low-risk subset of patients with stage 1B invasive squamous cancer of the cervix possibly suited to less radical surgery treatment. Gynecol. Oncol.57(1), 3–6 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed H, Capstick V, Schepansky A et al. Early cervical cancer and parametrial involvement: is it significant? Gynecol. Oncol.103(1), 53–57 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegeman M, Louwen M, van der Velden J et al. The incidence of parametrial tumor involvement in select patients with early cervix cancer is too low to justify parametrectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.105(2), 475–480 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumovitz M, Sun CH, Schmeler KM et al. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynecol.114(1), 93–99 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strnad P, Robova H, Skapa P et al. A prospective study of sentinel lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with small tumour volume cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.109(2), 280–284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti Panici PL, Bellati F, Pastore M et al. An update in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.107, S20–S22 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. Eur. J. Cancer39(17), 2470–2486 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Halaska M, Robova H. Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol.11(3), 292–301 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar