Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial inflammation

References

• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation121, 2462–2508 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC White paper. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53, 1475–1487 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG. Myocardial edema – a new clinical entity? Nat. Rev. Cardiol.7, 292–296 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards NC, Routledge H, Steeds RP. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess myocardial oedema in ischaemic heart disease. Heart95, 1357–1361 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Simonetti O, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging26, 452–459 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A et al. Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation113, 1865–1870 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Cocker M, Meek C, Tyberg JV, Friedrich MG. Edema as a very early marker for acute myocardial ischemia: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53, 1194–1201 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai KV, Laine GA, Stewart RH et al. Mechanics of the left ventricular myocardial interstitium: effects of acute and chronic myocardial edema. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.294, H2428–H2434 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijnens B, Sutherland GR. Myocardial oedema: a forgotten entity essential to the understanding of regional function after ischaemia or reperfusion injury. Heart94, 1117–1119 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 1815–1822 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55, 2470–2479 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Adriaenssens T, Dymarkowski S, Desmet W, Bogaert J. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 825–831 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation118, 837–844 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedstrom E, Heiberg E, Jovinge S, Arheden H. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 569–576 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeserich M, Olschewski M, Bley T et al. Cardiac involvement after respiratory tract viral infection – detection by cardiac magnetic resonance. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.33, 15–19 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yelgec NS, Dymarkowski S, Ganame J, Bogaert J. Value of MRI in patients with a clinical suspicion of acute myocarditis. Eur. Radiol.17, 2211–2217 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wince WB, Kim RJ. Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk – a risky business? Nat. Rev. Cardiol.7, 547–549 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.13, 13 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dwyer AJ, Frank JA, Sank VJ, Reinig JW, Hickey AM, Doppman JL. Short-Ti inversion-recovery pulse sequence: analysis and initial experience in cancer imaging. Radiology168, 827–836 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francone M, Carbone I, Agati L et al. Utility of T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences in cardiac MRI: an overview of clinical applications in ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart disease. Radiol. Med.116, 32–46 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou X, Rundell V, Liu Y et al. T(2)-weighted STIR imaging of myocardial edema associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury: the influence of proton density effect on image contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging33, 962–967 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellman P, Aletras AH, Mancini C, McVeigh ER, Arai AE. T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo. Magn. Reson. Med.57, 891–897 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry C, Kellman P, Mancini C et al. Magnetic resonance imaging delineates the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 527–535 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aletras AH, Kellman P, Derbyshire JA, Arai AE. ACUT2E TSE-SSFP: a hybrid method for T2-weighted imaging of edema in the heart. Magn. Reson. Med.59, 229–235 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne AR, Casey M, McClure J et al. Bright-blood T2-weighted MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy than dark-blood short tau inversion recovery MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction and for assessment of the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging4, 210–219 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A et al. T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.11, 56 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging4, 269–278 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Alkasab TK, Narin O et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after adoption of restrictive gadolinium-based contrast agent guidelines. Radiology260(1), 105–111 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, Marciniak H, Luft FC, Dietz R. Contrast media-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging visualizes myocardial changes in the course of viral myocarditis. Circulation97, 1802–1809 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutberlet M, Spors B, Thoma T et al. Suspected chronic myocarditis at cardiac MR: diagnostic accuracy and association with immunohistologically detected inflammation and viral persistence. Radiology246, 401–409 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagrosek A, Abdel-Aty H, Boye P et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance monitors reversible and irreversible myocardial injury in myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 131–138 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold M, Sheridan DC, Kushner JD et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial contrast uptake and blood flow in patients affected with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.295, H1234–H1242 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.5, 505–514 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewton N, Liu CY, Croisille P, Bluemke D, Lima JA. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.57, 891–903 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Kim RJ. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur. Heart J.26, 1461–1474 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohl S, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H et al. Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals typical patterns of myocardial injury in patients with various forms of non-ischemic heart disease. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging24, 597–607 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunold P, Schlosser T, Vogt FM et al. Myocardial late enhancement in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: distinction between infarction scar and non-infarction-related disease. Am. J. Roentgenol.184, 1420–1426 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper LT Jr. Myocarditis. N. Engl. J. Med.360, 1526–1538 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Circulation116, 2216–2233 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N et al. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries. Eur. Heart J.28, 1242–1249 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected apical ballooning syndrome using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Heart J.29, 2651–2659 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather AN, Fairbairn TA, Artis NJ, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Diagnostic value of CMR in patients with biomarker-positive acute chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 661–664 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G et al. Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.30, 2869–2879 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfoud F, Gartner B, Kindermann M et al. Virus serology in patients with suspected myocarditis: utility or futility? Eur. Heart J.32, 897–903 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart GC, Lopez-Molina J, Gottumukkala RV et al. Myocardial parvovirus B19 persistence: lack of association with clinicopathologic phenotype in adults with heart failure. Circ. Heart Fail.4, 71–78 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zagrosek A, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, Rudolph A, Dietz R, Schulz-Menger J. Relation between myocardial edema and myocardial mass during the acute and convalescent phase of myocarditis – a CMR study. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.10, 19 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puntmann VO, Taylor PC, Barr A, Schnackenburg B, Jahnke C, Paetsch I. Towards understanding the phenotypes of myocardial involvement in the presence of self-limiting and sustained systemic inflammation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Rheumatology49, 528–535 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’armellina E, Karia N, Lindsay AC et al. Dynamic changes of edema and late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to functional recovery and salvage index. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging4, 228–236 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation109, 1250–1258 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Deluigi CC et al. Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis. Circulation114, 1581–1590 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottgen R, Christiani R, Freyhardt P et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in acute myocarditis and correlation with immunohistological parameters. Eur. Radiol.21, 1259–1266 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M et al. Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation122, 900–909 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F et al. Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis. Heart84, 245–250 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caforio AL, Calabrese F, Angelini A et al. A prospective study of biopsy-proven myocarditis: prognostic relevance of clinical and aetiopathogenetic features at diagnosis. Eur. Heart J.28, 1326–1333 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini M, Oreto G, Albanese A et al. Presumptive myocarditis with ST-elevation myocardial infarction presentation in young males as a new syndrome. Clinical significance and long term follow up. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound9, 1 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cocker MS, Abdel-Aty H, Strohm O, Friedrich MG. Age and gender effects on the extent of myocardial involvement in acute myocarditis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart95, 1925–1930 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monney PA, Sekhri N, Burchell T et al. Acute myocarditis presenting as acute coronary syndrome: role of early cardiac magnetic resonance in its diagnosis. Heart97(16), 1312–1318 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leurent G, Langella B, Fougerou C et al. Diagnostic contributions of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients presenting with elevated troponin, acute chest pain syndrome and unobstructed coronary arteries. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis.104, 161–170 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K, Gutberlet M, Schuler G, Thiele H. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or myocardial infarction? Answers from delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Int. J. Cardiol.135, e9–e12 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Escher F, Westermann D, Gaub R et al. Development of diastolic heart failure in a 6-year follow-up study in patients after acute myocarditis. Heart97, 709–714 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yared K, Baggish AL, Picard MH, Hoffmann U, Hung J. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 650–660 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 333–343 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert J, Francone M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.11, 14 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J. Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur. Radiol.16, 569–574 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima S, Yamada N, Goto Y. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging. N. Engl. J. Med.341, 373–374 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noth I, Strek ME, Leff AR. Churg–Strauss syndrome. Lancet361, 587–594 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassmuth R, Gobel U, Natusch A et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging detects cardiac involvement in Churg–Strauss syndrome. J. Card. Fail.14, 856–860 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun W, Grist TM, Kamp TJ, Warner TF, Christian TF. Infiltrative eosinophilic myocarditis diagnosed and localized by cardiac resonance imaging. Circulation110, e19 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S et al. Time course of eosinophilic myocarditis visualized by CMR. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.10, 21 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Judson MA, Donnino R et al. Cardiac sarcoidosis. Am. Heart J.157, 9–21 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D et al. Clinical significance of myocardial magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with sarcoidosis: a 1-year follow-up study. Chest122, 1895–1901 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada T, Shimada K, Sakane T et al. Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis and evaluation of the effects of steroid therapy by gadolinium–DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Med.110, 520–527 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Menger J, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H et al. Patterns of myocardial inflammation and scarring in sarcoidosis as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart92, 399–400 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MR, Cawley PJ, Heitner JF et al. Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis. Circulation120, 1969–1977 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong BY, Muthupillai R, Nemeth M et al. The utility of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for identifying nonischemic myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic patients with biopsy-proven systemic sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis.26, 39–46 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirani J, Roberts WC. Subepicardial myocardial lesions. Am. Heart J.125, 1346–1352 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwan IN, Hooper LV, Sheppard MN. Cardiac sarcoidosis and sudden death. The heart may look normal or mimic other cardiomyopathies. Virchows Arch.458(6), 671–678 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman MJ, Salmon JE. Cardiovascular manifestations of rheumatologic diseases. Circulation116, 2346–2355 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Neill SG, Woldman S, Bailliard F et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis.68, 1478–1481 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishimori ML, Martin R, Berman DS et al. Myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging4, 27–33 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh JA, Woodard PK, Davila-Roman VG et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus: a preliminary report. Lupus14, 137–144 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Siegle N, Natusch A et al. Myocardial tissue characterization in systemic lupus erythematosus: value of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach. Lupus17, 561–567 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles JT, Malayeri AA, Fernandes V et al. Left ventricular structure and function by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum.62, 940–951 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler CR, Thompson R, Haykowsky M, Toma M, Paterson I. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.11, 7 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marie PY, Angioi M, Carteaux JP et al. Detection and prediction of acute heart transplant rejection with the myocardial T2 determination provided by a black-blood magnetic resonance imaging sequence. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37, 825–831 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor AJ, Vaddadi G, Pfluger H et al. Diagnostic performance of multisequential cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute cardiac allograft rejection. Eur. J. Heart Fail.12, 45–51 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usta E, Burgstahler C, Aebert H et al. The challenge to detect heart transplant rejection and transplant vasculopathy non-invasively – a pilot study. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.4, 43 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korosoglou G, Osman NF, Dengler TJ et al. Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance for the evaluation of chronic allograft vasculopathy in transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant.9, 2587–2596 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akashi YJ, Goldstein DS, Barbaro G, Ueyama T. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a new form of acute, reversible heart failure. Circulation118, 2754–2762 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Athanasiadis A, Schwab J et al. [Clinical spectrum of tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy in Germany: results of the tako-tsubo registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)]. Dtsch Med. Wochenschr.135, 1908–1913 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez-Perez GC, Aguilar-Arjona JA, de la Fuente GT et al. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: assessment with cardiac MRI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.195, W139–W145 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Lucke C, Grothoff M et al. Inflammation in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Radiol.20, 422–431 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SB, Chao T, Herzka DA et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T2 signal abnormalities in left ventricular ballooning syndrome. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging26, 227–232 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott P, Arbustini E. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a commentary on joint AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines. Heart95, 759–760 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korkusuz H, Esters P, Huebner F, Bug R, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ. Accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: comparison of MR and histological findings in an animal model. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.12, 49 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone RI, Greenwood JP, Biglands JD, Plein S, Ridgway JP, Radjenovic A. Assessment of tissue edema in patients with acute myocardial infarction by computer-assisted quantification of triple inversion recovery prepared MRI of the myocardium. Magn. Reson. Med.66(2), 565–574 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am. J. Cardiol.52, 184–188 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar