Current perspectives in endoscopic vessel harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting

References

• Tran HM, Paterson HS, Meldrum-Hanna W, Chard RB. Tunnelling versus open harvest technique in obtaining venous conduits for coronary bypass surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.14(6), 602–606 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Simek M, Nemec P, Bruk V et al. Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting – a prospective analysis. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.55(7), 428–432 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Cook RC, Crowley CM, Hayden R et al. Traction injury during minimally invasive harvesting of the saphenous vein is associated with impaired endothelial function. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.127(1), 65–71 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault LP, Kollpainter R, Page P et al. Techniques, complications, and pitfalls of endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. J. Card. Surg.20(4), 393–402 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Vitali RM, Reddy RC, Molinaro PJ, Sabado MF, Jacobowitz IJ. Hemodynamic effects of carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic vein harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.70(3), 1098–1099 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Chiu KM, Chen CL, Chu SH, Lin TY. Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases. Surg. Endosc.22(1), 183–187 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lutz CW, Hillmann R, Lutter G, Schoellhorn J, Beyersdorf F. Endoscopic vs. conventional vein harvesting: first results with a new, non-disposable system. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.49(6), 321–327 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Allen KB, Shaar CJ. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.64(1), 265–266 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Connolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg.74(2), 502–505 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman RV, Lammle WG, Matz KJ. Cost-effective endoscopic radial artery harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.82(1), 353–354 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisleri G, Muneretto C. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting. MMCTS2009(0907), 3780 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Patel AN, Henry AC, Hunnicutt C et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78(1), 149–153 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wipke-Tevis DD, Stotts NA, Skov P, Carrieri-Kohlman V. Frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions. Heart Lung25(2), 108–116 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• DeLaria GA, Hunter JA, Goldin MD et al. Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.81(3), 403–407 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled trials. Innovations (Phila.)1(2), 61–74 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Al-Ruzzeh S et al. Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.26(5), 1015–1026 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Skapinakis P et al. Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.76(6), 2141–2146 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen K, Cheng D, Cohn W et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations: Technology & Techniques in Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery1(2), 51–60 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen JJ, Nekrasas V, Dethlefsen C. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.34(2), 384–389 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Brown EN, Kon ZN, Tran R et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.134(5), 1259–1265 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao C, Aziz O, Deeba S et al. Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.135(4), 809–815 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Greene MA, Malias MA. Arm complications after radial artery procurement for coronary bypass operation. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72(1), 126–128 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim G, Jeong Y, Cho Y, Lee J, Cho J. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting may be the procedure of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ. J.71(10), 1511–1515 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudez I, Unic D, Sutlic Z et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting reduces postoperative pain and neurologic complications. Heart Surg. Forum10(5), E363–E365 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Shapira OM, Eskenazi BR, Anter E et al. Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: functional and histologic assessment of the conduit. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.131(2), 388–394 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza DS, Dashwood MR, Tsui JC et al. Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques. Ann. Thorac. Surg.73(4), 1189–1195 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D et al. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.123(2), 204–212 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch JD, O’Hair DP, Keuler JP et al. Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68(4), 1513–1516 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Griffith GL, Allen KB, Waller BF et al. Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison. Ann. Thorac. Surg.69(2), 520–523 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrawi SJ, Balaya F, Raju R, Cunningham JN Jr, Acinapura AJ. A comparative study of endothelial cell injury during open and endoscopic saphenectomy: an electron microscopic evaluation. Heart Surg. Forum4(2), 120–127 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Alrawi S, Balaya F, Raju R et al. Nitric oxide expression by interleukin-10 in the endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. JSLS6(1), 5–9 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Rousou LJ, Taylor KB, Lu XG et al. Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage. Ann. Thorac. Surg.87(1), 62–70 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrawi SJ, Samee M, Raju R et al. Intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecule levels in endoscopic and open saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg. Forum3(3), 241–245 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Black EA, Guzik TJ, West NE et al. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: effects on endothelial and smooth muscle function. Ann. Thorac. Surg.71(5), 1503–1507 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Cisowski M, Wites M, Gerber W, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Bochenek A. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting – comparison of three less invasive methods. Med. Sci. Monit.6(4), 735–739 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tevaerai HT MX, von Segesser LK. Minimally invasive internal saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass. Swiss Surg. (Suppl. 2), 8–11 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Morris RJ, Butler MT, Samuels LE. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.66(3), 1026–1028 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bonde P, Graham AN, MacGowan SW. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations. Ann. Thorac. Surg.77(6), 2076–2082 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius AM, Diegeler A, Doll N, Weidenbach H, Mohr FW. Minimally invasive saphenous vein-harvesting techniques: morphology and postoperative outcome. Ann. Thorac. Surg.70(2), 473–478 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Folliguet TA, Le Bret E, Moneta A, Musumeci S, Laborde F. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting versus ‘open’ technique. A prospective study. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.13(6), 662–666 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis Z, Jacobs HK, Zhang M, Thomas C, Castellanos Y. Endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: technique and outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.116(2), 228–235 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O et al. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG – a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.50(3), 160–163 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA et al. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann. Thorac. Surg.66(1), 26–31 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Panesar SS et al. Does minimally invasive vein-harvesting technique affect the quality of the conduit for coronary revascularization? Ann. Thorac. Surg.80(6), 2407–2414 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Burris NS, Brown EN, Grant M et al. Optical coherence tomography imaging as a quality assurance tool for evaluating endoscopic harvest of the radial artery. Ann. Thorac. Surg.85(4), 1271–1277 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B et al. Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.134(3), 649–656 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med.361(3), 235–244 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee MJ, Alexander JH, Hafley G et al. Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV. Ann. Thorac. Surg.85(2), 494–499 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.129(3), 496–503 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth KJ et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.89(2), 403–408 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dacey LJ, Braxton JH, Likosky DS. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. N. Engl. J. Med.361(19), 1908 (2009).
   Google Scholar