Development of bioactive conducting polymers for neural interfaces

References

• Eshraghi AA, King JE, Hodges AV, Balkany TJ. Cochlear implants. In: The Bionic Human. Johnson FE, Virgo KS, Lairmore TC, Audisio RA (Eds). Humana Press, KY, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ohira A, de Juan E, Tsai M. Long-term histologic and electrophysiologic evaluation of the alloy retinal tack. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.229(1), 95–98 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook MA. Platinum in silicone breast implants. Biomaterials27, 274–3286 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Levin G, Orlando Ortiz A, Katz DS. Noncardiac implantable pacemakers and stimulators: current role and radiographic appearance. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.188(4), 984–991 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard M, Chaubey A, Malhotra BD. Application of conducting polymers to biosensors. Biosens. Bioelec.17(5), 345–359 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamato H, Ohwa Mand Wernet W. Stability of polypyrrole and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for biosensor application. J. Electroanal. Chem.397(1–2), 163–170 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RA, Suaning GJ, Poole-Warren LA, Lovell NH. Bioactive conducting polymers for neural interfaces: application to vision prosthesis. Presented at: 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). IEEE Press, Antalya, Turkey, 29 April–2 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson RT, Wise AK, Thompson BC et al. Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons. Biomaterials30, 2614–2624 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Martin DC. Fuzzy gold electrodes for lowering impedance and improving adhesion with electrodeposited conducting polymer films. Sens. Actuators A.103(3), 384–394 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt C. Conducting Polymers. Kingston University, London, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Green RA, Lovell NH, Wallace GG, Poole-Warren LA. Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant. Biomaterials29, 3393–3399 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimard NK, Gomez N, Schmidt CE. Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci.32, 876–921 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D-F, Wang H-J, Fu J-X et al. Preparation of a hydrophobic polythiophene film to improve protein adsorption and proliferation of PC 12 cells. J. Phys. Chem. B.112(51), 16290–16299 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Cui X, Hancock JM et al. Electrochemical polymerization of poly(hydroxymethylated-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT-MeOH) on multichannel neural probes. Sens. Actuators B.99, 437–443 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Cui X, Martin DC. Electrochemical polymerization and properties of PEDOT/S-EDOT on neural microelectrode arrays. J. Electroanal. Chem.573, 43–48 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Martin DC, Cui X, Shenai M. Surface modification of neural probes with conducting polymer poly(hydroxymethylated-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and its biocompatibility. App. Biochem. Biotech.128(2), 117–129 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masada H, Asano DK. Preparation and properties of polypyrrole. Synth. Metals135–136, 43–44 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren LF, Walker JA, Anderson DP, Rhodes CG. A study of conducting polymer morphology: the effect of dopant anions upon order. J. Electrochem. Soc.136(8), 2286–2295 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalkhali RA. Electrochemical synthesis and characterization of electroactive conducting polypyrrole polymers. Russ. J. Electrochem.41(9), 1023–1935 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Minehan DS, Marx KA, Tripathy SK. DNA binding to electropolymerized polypyrrole: the dependence on film characteristics. J. Macromol. Sci. A Pure App. Chem.38(12), 1245–1258 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja T, Mir IA, Kumar D, Rajesh A. Potentiometric urea biosensor based on BSA embedded surface modified polypyrrole film. Sens. Actuators B.134(1), 140–145 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner JM, Forciniti L, Nguyen H et al. Biocompatibility implications of polypyrrole synthesis techniques. Biomed. Mater.3(3), 034124 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Hetke JF, Wiler JA, Anderson DJ, Martin DC. Electrochemical deposition and characterization of conducting polymer polypyrrole/PSS on multichannel neural probes. Sens. Actuators A.93(1), 8–18 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RA, Lovell NH, Poole-Warren LA. Cell attachment functionality of bioactive conducting polymers for neural interfaces. Biomaterials30(22), 3637–3644 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RA, Lovell NH, Poole-Warren LA. Impact of co-incorporating laminin-peptide dopants and neurotrophic growth factors on conducting polymer properties. Acta Biomaterialia DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.030 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer WR, Cui XT. Polypyrrole doped with 2 peptide sequences from laminin. Biomaterials27, 2405–2413 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Lee VA, Raphael Y et al. Surface modification of neural recording electrodes with conducting polymer/biomolecule blends. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.56(2), 261–272 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Wiler J, Dzaman M, Altschuler RA, Martin DC. In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. Biomaterials24(5), 777–787 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier JH, Camp JP, Hudson TW, Schmidt CE. Synthesis and characterization of polypyrrole-hyaluronic acid composite biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.50, 574–584 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund M, von Holst H, Inganäs O. Composite biomolecule/PEDOT materials for neural electrodes. Biointerphases3(3), 83–93 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner B, Hodgson AJ, Wallace GG, Underwood PA. Human endothelial cell attachment to and growth on polypyrrole-heparin is vitronectin dependent. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.10(1), 19–27 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner B, Georgevich A, Hodgson A, Liu L, Wallace GG. Polypyrrole-heparin composites as stimulus-responsive substrates for endothelial cell growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B.44(2), 121–129 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepel J, Bruckenstein S, Hepel M. Effect of pH on ion dynamics in composite PPy/heparin films. Microchem. J.55, 179–191 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizawa M, Kamiya T, Nozaki H, Kaji H. Anisotropic growth of conducting polymers along heparin-modified surfaces. Langmuir23(16), 8304–8307 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo M, Reynolds JR. Electrochemically stimulated adenosine 5-triphosphate (ATP) release through redox switching of conducting polypyrrole films and bilayers. Chem. Mater.8(1), 128–133 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo M, Reynolds JR. Poly(pyrrole adenosine 5´-triphosphate) (PP-ATP) and conducting polymer bilayers for transport of biologically active ions. Synth. Metals71(1–3), 2233–2236 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle A, Genies E, Fouletier M. Electrochemical behaviour of polypyrrole films doped with ATP anions. J. Electroanal. Chem.279(1–2), 179–186 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Che J, Li CM et al. Preparation of nano-tentacle polypyrrole with pseudo-molecular template for ATP incorporation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.80A(4), 925–931 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song HK, Toste B, Ahmann K, Hoffman-Kim D, Palmore GTR. Micropatterns of positive guidance cues anchored to polypyrrole doped with polyglutamic acid: a new platform for characterizing neurite extension in complex environments. Biomaterials27, 473–484 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Richardson-Burns SM, Hendricks JL, Sequera C, Martin DC. Effect of immobilized nerve growth factor on conductive polymers: electrical properties and cellular response. Adv. Funct. Mater.17(1), 1–8 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Jiang M. Toward genolelectronics: nucleic acid doped conducting polymers. Langmuir16(5), 2269–2274 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson AJ, John MJ, Campbell T et al. Integration of biocomponents with synthetic structures – use of conducting polymer polyelectrolyte composites. Proc. SPIE2716, 164–176 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson BC, Moulton SE, Ding J et al. Optimising the incorporation and release of a neurotrophic factor using conducting polypyrrole. J. Control. Release116(3), 285–294 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson RT, Thompson B, Moulton S et al. The effect of polypyrrole with incorporated neurotrophin-3 on the promotion of neurite outgrowth from auditory neurons. Biomaterials28(3), 513–523 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa R, Lagenaur CF, Cui XT. Electrochemically controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer polypyrrole coated electrode. J. Control. Release110(3), 531–541 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez N, Schmidt CE. Nerve growth factor-immobilized polypyrrole: bioactive electrically conducting polymer for enhanced neurite extension. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A.81A(1), 135–149 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace GG, Spinks GM. Conducting polymers – bridging the bionic interface. Soft Matter3, 665–671 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Y, Yu X, Gilbert R, Bellamkonda RV. Stabilizing electrode–host interfaces: a tissue engineering approach. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.38(6), 627–632 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reich U, Mueller PP, Fadeeva E et al. Differential fine-tuning of cochlear implant material-cell interactions by femtosecond laser microstructuring. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B.87B(1), 146–153 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volckaerts B, Corless AR, Mercanzini A et al. Technology developments to initiate a next generation of cochlear implants. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Lyon, France, 23–26 August 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft HA, Donaldson GS, Nelson DA. Effects of pulse rate and electrode array design on intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.116(4), 2258–2268 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft HA, Donaldson GS, Nelson DA. Effects of pulse rate on threshold and dynamic range in clarion cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.115, 1885–1888 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear.21, 608–624 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose TL, Robblee LS. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes; VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.37(11) (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Abidian MR, Salas LG, Yazdan-Shahmorad A et al. In-vivo evaluation of chronically implanted neural microelectrode arrays modified with poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanotubes. Proceedings of the 3rd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. HI, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lovell NH, Hallum LE, Chen S et al. Advances in retinal neuroprosthetics. In: Handbook of Neural Engineering. Akay M (Ed.). IEEE/Wiley Press, NY, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Maynard EM. Visual prostheses. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.3, 145–168 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland J, Humayan M. Past, present and future of artificial vision. Artif. Organs27, 961–962 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong YT, Chen SC, Seo JM et al. Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array. Vision Res.48, 825–833 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Schuettler M. Electrochemical properties of platinum electrodes in vitro: comparison of six different surface qualities. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Cité Internationale, Lyon, France, 23–26 August 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman S, Hendricks J, Richardson-Burns S et al. PEDOT coated microelectrode arrays for chronic neural recording and stimulation. Proceedings of the 4th International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. Antalya, Turkey, 29 April–2 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL. Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci.29(9), 536–546 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour J, Kipke DR. Open-architecture neural probes reduce cellular encapsulation. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.926, 1–6 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Polikov VS, Tresco PA, Reichert WM. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods148, 1–18 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarowski DH, Andersen MD, Retterer S et al. Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices. Brain Res.983(1–2), 23–35 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig KA, Uram JD, Yang J, Martin DC. Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with poly(3,4-ehtylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film. J. Neural Eng.3, 59–70 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill DR, Bikson M, Jefferys JGR. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods141(2), 171–198 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter G, Reich U, Müller PP et al. Fine-tuning of cochlear implant material-cell interactions by femtosecond laser microstructuring. Eur. Cells Mater.13(3), 10 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt CE, Shastri VR, Vacanti JP, Langer R. Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA94(17), 8948–8953 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wester BA, Lee RH, LaPlaca MC. Development and characterization of in vivo flexible electrodes compatiblewith large tissue displacements. J. Neural Eng.6, 1–7 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer JT. Electrodes for Functional Electrical Stimulation. Case Western Reserve University, OH, USA, 30 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Richardson-Burns SM, Povlich L et al. Soft, fuzzy and bioactive conducting polymers for improving the chronic performance of neural prosthetic devices. In: Indwelling Neural Implants: Strategies for Contending with the In vivo Environment. Reichert WM (Ed.). CRC Press, FL, USA, 177–220 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Miller K, Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J. Biomechanics35, 483–490 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan SF. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.10, 275–309 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RA. Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: impact of physico-chemical properties on biological performance. In: Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering. University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wilks SJ, Richardson-Burn SM, Hendricks JL, Martin DC, Otto KJ. Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) as a micro-neural interface material for electrostimulation. Front. Neuroeng.2(7) (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettingill LN, Richardson RT, Wise AK, O’Leary S, Shepherd RK. Neurotrophic factors and neural prostheses: potential clinical applications based upon findings in the auditory system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.54(6), 1138–1148 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human P, Zilla PJ. Inflammatory and immune processes: the neglected villain of bioprosthetic degeneration? J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants11(3–4), 199–220 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poole-Warren LA, Martens PJ. Overview of recent advances in injectable materials for augmentation of bone and soft-tissue. Rec. Pat. Biomed. Eng.1(2), 116–126 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zaulyanov L, Kirsner RS. A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf®) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Clin. Interv. Aging2(1), 93–98 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Martin DC. Electrochemical deposition and characterization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on neural microelectrode arrays. Sens. Actuators B.89(1–2), 92–102 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateh DD, Navsaria HA, Vadgama P. Polypyrrole-based conducting polymers and interactions with biological tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface3, 741–752 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidez PR, Li S, MacDiarmid AG et al. Polyaniline, an electroactive polymer, supports adhesion and proliferation of cardiac myoblasts. J. Biomater Sci. Poly. Ed.17, 199–212 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Abidan M, Martin DC. Conducting polymers grown in hydrogel scaffolds coated on neural prosthetic devices. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.71(A), 577–585 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Martin DC. Impedance spectroscopy and nanoindentation of conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) coatings on microfabricated neural prosthetic devices. J. Mater. Res.21(5), 1124–1132 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaoquan S, Chun L, Yingqiu L. High-strength conducting polymers prepared by electrochemical polymerization in boron trifluoride diethyl etherate solution. Adv. Mater.11(13), 1145–1146 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Price WE, Ralph SF, Wallace GG. Synthesis and properties of a mechanically strong poly(bithiophene) composite polymer containing a polyelectrolyte dopant. Synth. Metals110, 123–132 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong S. Conducting polymers and doping-dedoping behaviour. Anal. Sci.7, 1367–1370 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek S, Green RA, Lovell NH, Poole-Warren LA. Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: doping for optimal electrical and mechanical performance. Presented at: the 19th Annual Conference of Australasian Society for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering. Sydney, Australia, 21–23 January 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons A, Hyvarinen J, Poole-Warren LA. The effect of sterilisation on a poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomer. Biomaterials27(25), 4484–4497 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes GCC, Brandao TRS, Silva CLM. Ethylene oxide sterilization of medical devices: a review. Am. J. Infect. Control35(9), 574–581 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DR, Abidian M, Martin DC. Synthesis and characterization of conducting polymers grown in hydrogels for neural applications. Materials Research Society. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol EXS-1 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Abidian MR, Martin DC. Multifunctional nanobiomaterials for neural interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater.19(4), 573–585 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohan F, Wei XF, Wongsarnpigoon A et al. Fabrication and evaluation of conductive elastomer electrodes for neural stimulation. J. Biomater Sci. Poly. Ed.18, 1057–1073 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans AJ, Thompson BC, Wallace GG et al. Promoting neurite outgrowth from spiral ganglion neuron explants using polypyrrole/BDNF-coated electrodes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A.91A(1), 241–250 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd RK, Coco A, Epp SB. Neurotrophins and electrical stimulation for protection and repair of spiral ganglion neurons following sensorineural hearing loss. Hear. Res.242, 100–109 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann EA. Guidance for Industry and FDA staff: Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device. US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, MD, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Beers E. Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Guidance for Retinal Prostheses. US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, MD, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Whitney CG et al. Risk of bacterial meningitis in children with cochlear implants. N. Engl. J. Med.349(5), 435–445 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson AJ, Gilmore KJ, Small C et al. Reactive supramolecular assemblies of mucopolysaccharide, polypyrrole and protein as controllable biocomposites for a new generation of intelligent biomaterials. Supramol. Sci.1(2), 77–83 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kotwal A, Schmidt CE. Electrical stimulation alters protein adsorption and nerve cell interactions with electrically conducting biomaterials. Biomaterials22(10), 1055–1064 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Lee J-W, Schmidt CE. Neuroactive conductive scaffolds: nerve growth factor conjugation on active ester-functionalized polypyrrole. J. R. Soc. Interface1–10 (2008).
   Google Scholar