Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement

References

• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M et al. The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants6, 893–904 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Achille H et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD003878 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G et al. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant. dentistry: a review. J. Periodontol.8, 1317–1329 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis. J. Prosthet. Dent.3, 232–235 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent. Clin. North Am.4, 777–808, vii (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U et al. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomizedcontrolled clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants5, 867–875 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V et al. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants4, 569–577 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Oh TJ, Shotwell J, Billy E et al. Flapless implant surgery in the esthetic region: advantages and precautions. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.1, 27–33 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F et al. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants30–42 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T et al. 3D x-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning. Int. J. Comput. Dent.1, 29–40 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M et al. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants5, 663–670 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G et al. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery. An approach using virtual reality. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.26, 423–434 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J et al. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int. J. Comput. Dent.1, 23–35 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Stein W, Hassfeld S, Brief J et al. CT-based 3D-planning for dental implantology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.50, 137–143 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J. Can. Dent. Assoc.1, 32 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.S111–S120 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1, 1–8 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J. Oral Rehabil.11, 835–840 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bonaudo D, Raimondo C, Rubino G. Single-tooth restorative treatment using an immediate-loading CAD/CAM technique. Int. J. Comput. Dent.4, 321–331 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Ivanovic, M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.1, 106–114 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.3, 156–172 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant. Dent.2, 135–142 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.5, 630–637 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ et al. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.5, 255–259 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP et al. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust. Orthod. J.2, 67–75 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier, KM et al. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.1, 41–48 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Holst S, Blatz MB, Eitner S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.3, 393–399 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lim TJ, Csillag A, Irinakis T et al. Intentional angulation of an implant to avoid a pneumatized maxillary sinus: a case report. J. Can. Dent. Assoc.3, 164–168 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Allum SR. Immediately loaded full-arch provisional implant restorations using CAD/CAM and guided placement: maxillary and mandibular case reports. Br. Dent. J.7, 377–381 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Marchack CB. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. J. Prosthet. Dent.6, 389–394 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kupeyan HK, Shaffner M, Armstrong J. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.3, 161–167 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.3, 239–247 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S et al. Image-based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1, 7–14 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J. Prosthet. Dent.6(Suppl.), S26–S34 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.S88–S94 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chow J, Hui E, Lee PK et al. Zygomatic implants – protocol for immediate occlusal loading: a preliminary report.J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.5, 804–811 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Schlieper J, Brinkmann B, Metz HJ. CT-Computer-Schablonengestutzte Planung der Implantat – und Magnetposition bei der epithetischen Versorgung von Gesichtsdefekten. [CT-computer-template-assisted planning of implant and magnet position in epi-prosthetic management of facial defects]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir1, 22–27 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML et al. Computed tomography: part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3, 137–141 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Wishan MS, Bahat O, Krane M. Computed tomography as an adjunct in dental implant surgery. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.1, 30–47 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Kraut RA. Utilization of 3D/dental software for precise implant site selection: clinical reports. Implant. Dent.2, 134–139 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Tan KB. The use of multiplanar reformatted computerised tomography in the surgical-prosthodontic planning of implant placement. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore1, 68–75 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Williams MY, Mealey BL, Hallmon WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3, 373–380 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Jeffcoat M, Jeffcoat RL, Reddy MS et al. Planning interactive implant treatment with 3-D computed tomography. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.11, 40–44 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, Yilmaz B et al. Determination of bone quality of 372 implant recipient sites using Hounsfield unit from computerized tomography: a clinical study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.4, 238–244 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Turkyilmaz I. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health1, 32 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha, LM et al. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2, 231–238 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 253–260 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3, 416–424 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hagiwara Y, Koizumi M, Igarashi T. Application of CT imaging for dental implant simulation. J. Oral Sci.4, 157–161 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Araki K, Maki K, Seki K et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial x-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.1, 51–59 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Scherer P, Ritter L et al. Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.1, 1–9 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hassfeld S, Streib S, Sahl H et al. Low-dose-Computertomographie des Kieferknochens in der praimplantologischen Diagnostik. grenzen der dosisreduzierung und genauigkeit von langenmessungen. [Low-dose computerized tomography of the jaw bone in pre-implantation diagnosis. Limits of dose reduction and accuracy of distance measurements]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir4, 188–193 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F et al. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.5, 268–273 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.2, 83–86 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A et al. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.4, 508–513 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol.9, 1558–1564 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.5, 285–290 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K et al. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.3, 371–377 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.7, 365–374 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.4, 245–248 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J et al. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 216–225 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P et al. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.4, 198–203 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J et al. The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.3, e108–e116 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ganz SD. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning. Dent. Implantol. Update12, 89–95 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.6, 609–625 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Bozic M, English J et al. Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region-an update. Int. J. Med. Robot. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.279 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski R et al. Three-dimensional diagnostics, planning and implementation in implantology. Int. J. Comput. Dent.4, 307–319 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Ritter L et al. Intraoperative navigation in the maxillofacial area based on 3D imaging obtained by a cone-beam device. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.8, 687–694 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J et al. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int.9, 763–772 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.4, 226–230 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Benn DK, Bidgood WD Jr, Pettigrew JC Jr. An imaging standard for dentistry. Extension of the radiology DICOM standard. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.3, 262–265 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Bidgood WD Jr, Horii SC. Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics2, 345–355 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging5, 842–852 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Mandelaris GA, Rosenfeld AL. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent.5, 297–305; quiz 306 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Stockham CD. Using CT and SIM/Plant to plan implant therapy. Alpha Omegan4, 35–38 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rubio Serrano M, Albalat Estela S, Penarrocha Diago M. Software applied to oral implantology: update. Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Cir. Bucal10, E661–E665 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormee J et al. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J. Oral Implantol.4, 300–303 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld AL, Mecall RA. The use of interactive computed tomography to predict the esthetic and functional demands of implant-supported prostheses. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.12, 1125–1128, 1130–1122 passim; quiz 1146 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld AL, Mecall RA. Use of prosthesis-generated computed tomographic information for diagnostic and surgical treatment planning. J. Esthet. Dent.3, 132–148 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Pesun IJ, Gardner FM. Fabrication of a guide for radiographic evaluation and surgical placement of implants. J. Prosthet. Dent.6, 548–552 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Duckmanton NA, Austin BW, Lechner SK et al. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants. Int. J. Prosthodont.1, 77–80 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Parel SM, Triplett RG. Interactive imaging for implant planning, placement, and prosthesis construction. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.9(Suppl. 2), 41–47 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Meitner SW, Tallents RH. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement. J. Prosthet. Dent.6, 569–574 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kraut RA. Interactive CT diagnostics, planning and preparation for dental implants. Implant. Dent.1, 19–25 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P et al. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.1, 52–61 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M et al. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant. Dentistry. Clin. Oral Implants Res.73–86 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Coudert JL, Champleboux G et al. Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J. Image Guid. Surg.1, 53–58 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Early report on the design of transfer of 3D-data to planning software
   Google Scholar
• Cucchiara R, Franchini F, Lamma A et al. Enhancing implant surgery planning via computerized image processing. Int. J. Comput. Dent.1, 9–24 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N et al. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J. Oral Rehabil.6, 454–474 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U et al. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin. Oral Implants Res.1, 81–85 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Azari A, Nikzad S. Computer-assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes-a review. Int. J. Med. Robot.2, 95–104 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.4–5, 207–211 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E et al. Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.2, 141–149 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Garg AK. Implant surgical templates in Implant. Dentistry: NobelGuide. Dent. Implantol. Update4, 25–28 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.11(3), 238–245 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz SD. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth. Dent. Today7, 122, 124, 126–127 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.3, 215–221 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.4, 347–353 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 3: stereolithographic drilling guides that do not require bone exposure and the immediate delivery of teeth. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.5, 493–499 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G et al. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a 3D approach. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants6, 806–810 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Nidecker A. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.4, 264–267 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent.5, 447–462 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.1, 46–51 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery – a review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 305–313 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ganz SD. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.9(Suppl. 2), 59–71 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sammartino G, Della Valle A, Marenzi G et al. Stereolithography in oral implantology: a comparison of surgical guides. Implant. Dent.2, 133–139 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Simon H. Use of transitional implants to support a surgical guide: enhancing the accuracy of implant placement. J. Prosthet. Dent.2, 229–232 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Guided implant placement and immediate prosthesis delivery using traditional branemark system abutments: a pilot study of 23 patients. Implant. Dent.2, 128–135 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sanna AM, Molly L, van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: a cohort study of consecutive patients. J. Prosthet. Dent.6, 331–339 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2, 394–401 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet E, Lucchini JP, Jenny R et al. An image-guided system based on custom templates: case reports. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.1, 40–47 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Varvara G, Esposito P, Franchini F et al. A positioning device for computed tomography: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent.2, 123–126 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E et al. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants1, 72–78 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Almog DM, Romano PR. CT-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance. NY State Dent. J.1, 51–53 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sclar AG. Guidelines for flapless surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.7(Suppl. 1), 20–32 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Marchack CB. An immediately loaded CAD/CAM-guided definitive prosthesis: a clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent.1, 8–12 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computed tomography, CAD/CAM technology, and the internet for immediate loading of dental implants. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.6, 312–323; discussion 324–315 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Johansson B, Friberg B, Nilson, H. Digitally planned, immediately loaded dental implants with prefabricated prostheses in the reconstruction of edentulous maxillae: a 1-year prospective, multicenter study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.11(3), 194–200 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng FC, Ho KH, Wexler A. Computer-assisted navigational surgery enhances safety in dental implantology. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore5, 383–388 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Casap N, Wexler A, Eliashar, R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: comparison of 2 navigation systems. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.7, 1467–1475 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Miller RJ, Bier J. Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant. Dent.1, 41–47 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin. Oral Implants Res.7, 709–716 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Weihe S, Kruse C, Franz E-P et al. A new planning and navigation system for dental implantology – evaluation of ergonomic aspects and accuracy. Int. J. CARS1, 421–423 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Birkfellner W, Huber K, Larson A et al. A modular software system for computer-aided surgery and its first application in oral implantology. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging6, 616–620 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Casap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A et al. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants1, 92–98 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Casap N, Wexler A, Lustmann J. Image-guided navigation system for placing dental implants. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.10, 783–784, 786, 788 passim; quiz 794–785 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Casap N, Wexler A, Tarazi E. Application of a surgical navigation system for implant surgery in a deficient alveolar ridge postexcision of an odontogenic myxoma. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.7, 982–988 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Heiland M, Pohlenz P, Blessmann M et al. Navigated implantation after microsurgical bone transfer using intraoperatively acquired cone-beam computed tomography data sets. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1, 70–75 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA et al. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.5, 276–281 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Watzinger F, Birkfellner W, Wanschitz F et al. Positioning of dental implants using computer-aided navigation and an optical tracking system: case report and presentation of a new method. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.2, 77–81 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Schermeier O, Lueth T, Glagau J et al. Automatic patient registration in computer assisted maxillofacial surgery. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.85, 461–467 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casap N, Wexler A, Persky N et al. Navigation surgery for dental implants: assessment of accuracy of the image guided implantology system. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.9(Suppl. 2), 116–119 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M et al. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.3, 329–334 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Freysinger W, Truppe MJ, Gunkel, AR et al. A full 3D-navigation system in a suitcase. Comput. Aided Surg.2, 85–93 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A et al.In vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant. dentistry. Clin. Oral Implants Res.1, 69–78 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Watzinger F, Birkfellner W, Wanschitz F et al. Placement of endosteal implants in the zygoma after maxillectomy: a Cadaver study using surgical navigation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.3, 659–667 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res.20(10), 1156–1162 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalt G, Gehrke P. Transfer precision of 3D implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation. Int. J. Comput. Dent.3–4, 213–225 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants4, 571–577 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of 3D cone-beam images: a pilot study. J. Clin. Periodontol.9, 816–821 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin. Oral Impl. Res.20(11), 1191–1199 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S et al. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin. Oral Implants Res.6, 651–656 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Chiu WK, Luk WK, Cheung LK. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant placement in a computer-assisted navigation system. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3, 465–470 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J. Periodontol.4, 503–507 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Schneider M et al. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants3, 382–386 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gaggl A, Schultes G. Assessment of accuracy of navigated implant placement in the maxilla. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 263–270 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G et al. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin. Oral Implants Res.5, 609–614 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Runte C et al. Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2, 102–108 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F et al. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin. Oral Implants Res.1, 59–64 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M et al. Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implants Res.6, 610–616 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin. Oral Implants Res.4, 495–501 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G et al. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin. Oral Implants Res.1, 60–68 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner A, Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W et al. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in patients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy. Clin. Oral Implants Res.3, 340–348 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K et al. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a pilot study in 20 patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants5, 801–807 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K et al. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants5, 785–790 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Xiaojun C, Ming Y, Yanping L et al. Image guided oral implantology and its application in the placement of zygoma implants. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.2, 162–173 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C et al. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Cir. Bucal5, E307–E312 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL et al. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants6, 886–893 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants1, 96–102 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Penarrocha M, Boronat A, Carrillo C et al. Computer-guided implant placement in a patient with severe atrophy. J. Oral Implantol.4, 203–207 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading in the maxilla using flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations: a retrospective 3-year clinical study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.29–36 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M et al. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 298–304 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.4, 551–559 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Marmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J et al. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol.1, 28–31 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Yong LT, Moy PK. Complications of computer-aided-design/computer-aided-machining-guided (NobelGuide) surgical implant placement: an evaluation of early clinical results. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.3, 123–127 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Oyama K, Kan JY, Kleinman, AS et al. Misfit of implant fixed complete denture following computer-guided surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants1, 124–130 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Van de Velde T, Glor F, De Bruyn H. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implants Res.1, 66–72 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Choi M, Romberg E, Driscoll CF. Effects of varied dimensions of surgical guides on implant angulations. J. Prosthet. Dent.5, 463–469 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin, M. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning and flapless surgery. Clin. Oral Implants Res.7, 677–685 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Campelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: a 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants2, 271–276 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio C. A new method for achieving passive fit of an interim restoration supported by Branemark implants: a technical note. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants5, 614–618 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Longoni S, Sartori M, Ariello F et al. Passive definitive fit of bar-supported implant overdentures. Implant. Dent.2, 129–134 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson K, Hildebrand D, Mehrhof J. Fabrication of a fixed retrievable implant-supported prosthesis based on electroforming: a technical report. J. Prosthodont.7, 591–595 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fuster-Torres MA, Albalat-Estela S, Alcaniz-Raya M et al. CAD / CAM dental systems in Implant. Dent.istry: update. Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Cir. Bucal3, E141–E145 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pieper R. Digital impressions – easier than ever. Int. J. Comput. Dent.1, 47–52 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.8, 494, 496, 498–505 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W et al. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int. J. Comput. Dent.1, 11–28 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E et al. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci.2, 174–179 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J et al. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci.3, 319–325 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Reich S, Botsis O, Deligiannis P et al. Fit of surgical guides – manufactured by InLab 3D. Int. J. Comput. Dent.4, 329–337 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Isidori M, Blanchet E et al. An image-guided system-drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: a clinical report on immediate loading. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.2, 111–119 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Schnitman PA. Computer-guided implant. dentistry. J. Mass Dent. Soc.3, 22–24 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod. Craniofac. Res.31–36; discussion 179–182 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rugani P, Kirnbauer B, Arnetzl GV et al. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology. Int. J. Comput. Dent.2, 131–145 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lofthag-Hansen S, Grondahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res.11(3), 246–255 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck JN, Conte GJ. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc.4, 287–290, 292–284, 296–287 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chau AC, Fung, K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.107(4), 559–565 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz SD. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.5, 256–258, 260–252, 264–257; quiz 268, 278 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Garg AK. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon’s Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System. Dent. Implantol. Update6, 41–45 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F et al. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.4, 571–577 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd NJ. A general dentist’s guide to proper dental implant placement from an oral surgeon’s perspective. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.2, 118–120, 122 passim; quiz 130 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J. Periodontol.8, 1061–1067 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and their clinical significance. Int. J. Prosthodont.2, 176–179 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Benington IC, Biagioni PA, Briggs J et al. Thermal changes observed at implant sites during internal and external irrigation. Clin. Oral Implants Res.3, 293–297 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Galanis CC, Sfantsikopoulos MM, Koidis PT et al. Computer methods for automating preoperative dental implant planning: implant positioning and size assignment. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.1, 30–38 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kusumoto N, Sohmura T, Yamada S et al. Application of virtual reality force feedback haptic device for oral implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implants Res.6, 708–713 (2006).
   Google Scholar