Bipolar technology for transurethral prostatectomy

References

• MadersbacherS, Lackner J, Brossner C et al. Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. Eur. Urol.47, 499–504 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan SA. Minimally invasive alternative therapeutic options for lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology51, 32–73 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) – incidence, management, and prevention. Eur. Urol.50(5), 969–979 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alschibaja M, May F, Treiber U et al. Recent improvements in transurethral high-frequency electrosurgery of the prostate. BJU Int.97(2), 243–246 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa MM, Young MR, Bullock AR, Bouet R, Petros JA. Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st Century. Urology64(2), 298–301 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, Orsoni JL, Herve JM, Lugagne PM. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J. Endurol.15(3), 313–316 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton AC, Francis RN. The provision of transurethral prostatectomy on a day-case basis using bipolar plasma kinetic technology. BJU Int.89, 534–537 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Zeng G, Zhong W, Mai Z, Zeng S, Tao X. A prospective, randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three-year follow-up results. Eur. Urol. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.026 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Dunsmuir WD, McFarlane JP, Tan A et al. Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis.6(2), 182–186 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J. Urol.174(4), 1339–1343 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon NH, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term followup. J. Urol.176(1), 205–209 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Wang XH, Qu LJ, Pu XY, Zeng X. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: pathologic study in canines. Urology70(1), 180–184 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinpairoj S, Feldman MD, Saunders JC, Thaler ER. A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model. Laryngoscope111(2), 213–217 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgul KT, Ayyildiz A, Nuhoglu B et al. Comparison of transurethral prostate resection and plasmakinetic prostate resection according to cautery artefacts in tissue specimens. Int. Urol. Nephrol.39, 1091–1096 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Wang XH, Wang HP, Qu LJ. Comparison of the microvessel diameter of hyperplastic prostate and the coagulation depth achieved with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. A pilot study on hemostatic capability. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.42(3), 265–268 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lin WC, Chang HK et al. Gyrus plasmasect. is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate? Urol. Int.73(3), 258–261 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkman JS, Santucci RA. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int.95(1), 69–71 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology67(1), 69–72 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, De Sio M, D’Armiento M. Bipolar plasmakinetic technology for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: evidence beyond marketing hype? BJU Int.100(5), 983–985 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, Damiano R, Di Lorenzo G et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur. Urol.55(4), 922–929 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Zang Li, Fan Qi-Lang et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int.160, 1339–1343 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Faul P, Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Stief CG, Reich O, Hahn RG. Clinical and technical aspects of bipolar transurethral prostate resection. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.42(4), 318–323 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilleran J, Thaly R, Chernoff A. Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate: reliable training vehicle for today’s urology residents. J. Endourol.20(9), 683–687 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. Urol.56(5), 798–809 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke N, Whelan P, Goeree L et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology75(5), 1015–1022 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bachmann A, Marberger M. The motion: laser therapy for BPH is preferable to TURP. Eur. Urol.54(3), 681–684 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmansy HM, Elzayat E, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser ablation versus photoselective vaporization of prostate less than 60 cc: long-term results of a randomized trial. J. Urol.184(5), 2023–2028 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoekstra RJ, Van Melick HH, Kok ET, Ruud Bosch JL. A 10-year follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia; long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int.106(6), 822–826 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhansali M, Patankar S, Dobhada S, Khaladkar S. Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate. J. Endourol.23(1), 141–145 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar