A wearable artificial kidney: technical requirements and potential solutions

References

• Ronco C, Davenport A, Gura V. Toward the wearable artificial kidney. Hemodial. Int.12(Suppl. 1), S40–S47 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellstrand CM, Rosa AA, Shideman JR, Rodrigo F, Davin T, Lynch RE. Optimal dialysis frequency and duration: the ‘unphysiology hypothesis’. Kidney Int. Suppl. (8), S120–S124 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Heidenheim AP, Muirhead N, Moist L, Lindsay RM. Patient quality of life on quotidian hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis.42(1 Suppl.), 36–41 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesrallah G, Suri R, Moist L, Kortas C, Lindsay RM. Volume control and blood pressure management in patients undergoing quotidian hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis.42(1 Suppl.), 13–17 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Blaney TL, Lindan O, Sparks RE. Adsorption: a step toward a wearable artificial kidney. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs12, 7–12 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• Blackshear PL Jr. Two new concepts that might lead to a wearable artificial kidney. Kidney Int. Suppl.8, S133–S137 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen SC, Stephen RL, Bulloch EC, Luntz RD, Kolff WJ. A wearable artificial kidney: functional description of hardware and clinical results. Proc. Clin. Dial. Transplant. Forum5, 65–71 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Stephens RL, Jacobsen SC, Atkin-thor E, Kolff W. Portable/wearable artificial kidney (WAK) – initial evaluation. Proc. Eur. Dial. Transplant. Assoc.12, 511–518 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown CE, Kramer NC. Factors in membrane design and selection as a step toward a wearable artificial kidney. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs14, 36–42 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Neff MS, Sadjadi S, Slifkin R. A wearable artificial glomerulus. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs25, 71–73 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Bazzato G, Coli U, Landini S et al. A bag-filter model as machineless artificial kidney. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs29, 657–661 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Kolff WJ. Exponential growth and future of artificial organs. Artif. Organs1(1), 8–18 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Shaldon S, Beau MC, Claret G. Sorbent regeneration of ultrafiltrate as a long-term treatment of end-stage renal failure. Artif. Organs2(4), 343–347 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Shettigar UR, Kablitz C, Stephen R, Kolff WJ. A portable hemodialysis/hemofiltration system independent of dialysate and infusion fluid. Artif. Organs7(2), 254–256 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Murisasco A, Reynier JP, Ragon A et al. Continuous arterio-venous hemofiltration in a wearable device to treat end-stage renal disease. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs32(1), 567–571 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Popovich RP, Moncrief JW, Nolph KD, Ghods AJ, Twardowski ZJ, Pyle WK. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann. Intern. Med.88(4), 449–456 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M, Ash SR, Lee DBN. Innovative peritoneal dialysis: flow-thru and dialysate regeneration. ASAIO J.45(5), 372–378 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Lukowicz P, Kirstein T, Troster G. Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf. Med.43(3), 232–238 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubel P, Fayn J, Simon-Chautemps L et al. New paradigms in telemedicine: ambient intelligence, wearable, pervasive and personalized. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.108, 123–132 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gura V, Ronco C, Davenport A. The wearable artificial kidney, why and how: from holy grail to reality. Semin. Dial.22(1), 13–17 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaschegg HD. What is required for a WAK? Presented at: World Conference on Portable-Wearable and Miniaturized Systems for Dialysis and Ultrafiltration. Vicenza Italy, 30th September–1st October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fissell WH, Roy S. The implantable artificial kidney. Semin. Dial.22(6), 665–670 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morti SM, Zydney AL. Protein–membrane interactions during hemodialysis: effects on solute transport. ASAIO J.44(4), 319–326 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Gao D, Letteri JJ, Clark WR. Blood–membrane interactions during dialysis. Semin. Dial.22(6), 623–628 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ronco C, Davenport A, Gura V. The future of the artificial kidney: moving towards wearable and miniaturized devices. Nefrologia31(1), 9–16 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Garzotto F, Cruz DN et al. Enhancement of solute removal in a hollow-fiber hemodialyzer by mechanical vibration. Blood Purif.31(4), 227–234 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Garzotto F, Chung SG, Ronco C. Effects of ambulation on hemodynamics of hollow-fiber hemodialyzer in the wearable artificial kidney. Presented at: World Conference on Portable-Wearable and Miniaturized Systems for Dialysis and Ultrafiltration. Vicenza, Italy, 30 September–1 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Humes HD, MacKay SM, Funke AJ, Buffington DA. Tissue engineering of a bioartificial renal tubule assist device: in vitro transport and metabolic characteristics. Kidney Int.55(6), 2502–2514 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes HD, Weitzel WF, Bartlett RH et al. Initial clinical results of the bioartificial kidney containing human cells in ICU patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int.66(4), 1578–1588 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase M, Bellomo R, Baldwin I et al. β2-microglobulin removal and plasma albumin levels with high cut-off hemodialysis. Int. J. Artif. Organs30(5), 385–392 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard EF, West AC, Shapley NC, Larsen MU. Dialysis without membranes: how and why? Blood Purif.22(1), 92–100 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenson AR, Ronco C, Pergamit G, Edelstein M, Watts R. The human nephron filter: Toward a continuously functioning, implantable artificial nephron system. Blood Purif.23(4), 269–274 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg E, Kaazempur-Mofrad M, Borenstein J. Concept and computational design for a bioartificial nephron-on-a-chip. Int. J. Artif. Organs31(6), 508–514 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes HD, Fissell WH, Tiranathanagul K. The future of hemodialysis membranes. Kidney Int.69(7), 1115–1119 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fissell WH, Dubnisheva A, Eldridge AN, Fleischman AJ, Zydney AL, Roy S. High-performance silicon nanopore hemofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci.326(1), 58–63 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouard T. Structural biology: breaking the protein rules. Nature471(7337), 151–153 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striemer CC, Gaborski TR, McGrath JL, Fauchet PM. Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes. Nature445(7129), 749–753 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu Y, Miki N. Multilayered microfilter using a nanoporous PES membrane and applicable as the dialyzer of a wearable artificial kidney. J. Micromech. Microeng.19(6), 065031 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A, Better OS, Greenbaum MA, Marantz LB, Gral T, Maxwell MH. Clinical maintenance hemodialysis with a sorbent-based, low-volume dialysate regeneration system. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs17, 253–258 (1971).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blagg CR, Vizzo JE, Jensen WB, Cole JJ. Experience with a sorbent-based dialysate regeneration system for hemodialysis. Prog. Biochem. Pharmacol.9, 239–248 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Blumenkrantz MJ, Gordon A, Roberts M. Applications of the Redy® sorbent system to hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Artif. Organs3(3), 230–236 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar JWM. Review: understanding sorbent dialysis systems. Nephrology (Carlton)15(4), 406–411 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano C, Esposito R, Bello P. Cold carbon apparatus for hemodialysis. J. Dial.1(2), 165–179 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim JC, Moon JH et al. Development of a cold dialysate regeneration system for home hemodialysis. Blood Purif.28(2), 84–92 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Tada Y, Horiuchi T, Ohta Y, Dohi T. A new approach for the filtrate regeneration system in the wearable artificial kidney. Artif. Organs14(6), 405–409 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Giordano C, Esposito R, Bello P, Quarto E. A resin-sorbent system for dialysate regeneration. Kidney Int.13(Suppl. 8), S138–S144 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Weber C, Rajnoch C, Loth F, Schima H, Falkenhagen D. The microspheres based detoxification system (MDS): a new extracorporeal blood purification technology based on recirculated microspherical adsorbent particles. Int. J. Artif. Organs17(11), 595–602 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ash SR. Sorbents in treatment of uremia: a short history and a great future. Semin. Dial.22(6), 615–622 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gura V, Macy AS, Beizai M, Ezon C, Golper TA. Technical breakthroughs in the wearable artificial kidney (WAK). Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.4(9), 1441–1448 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gura V, Beizai M, Ezon C, Polaschegg HD. Continuous renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease. The wearable artificial kidney (WAK). Contrib. Nephrol.149, 325–333 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boehm DA, Gottlieb PA, Hua SZ. On-chip microfluidic biosensor for bacterial detection and identification. Sens. Actuators B Chem.126(2), 508–514 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter A, Marz A, Schumacher W, Rosch P, Popp J. Towards a fast, high specific and reliable discrimination of bacteria on strain level by means of SERS in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip11(6), 1013–1021 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanholder R, Ringoir S. Pitfalls of wearable artificial kidney. Int. J. Artif. Organs13(11), 715–719 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Verhallen AM, Kooistra MP, van Jaarsveld BC. Cannulating in haemodialysis: rope-ladder or buttonhole technique? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.22(9), 2601–2604 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Struthers J, Allan A, Peel RK, Lambie SH. Buttonhole needling of ateriovenous fistulae: a randomized controlled trial. ASAIO J.56(4), 319–322 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Trakarnvanich T, Chirananthavat T, Maneerat P, Chabsuwan S, Areeyakulnimit S. Is single-needle hemodialysis still a good treatment in end-stage renal disease? Blood Purif.25(5–6), 490–496 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rostoker G, Griuncelli M, Loridon C, Bourlet T, Welsch K, Benmaadi A. Improving the efficiency of short-term single-needle hemodialysis. Ren. Fail.31(4), 261–266 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beathard GA, Posen GA. Initial clinical results with the LifeSite Hemodialysis Access System. Kidney Int.58(5), 2221–2227 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M, Caridi JG, Hakki FZ et al. Efficacy and safety results with the LifeSite hemodialysis access system versus the Tesio-Cath hemodialysis catheter at 12 months. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.17(3), 497–504 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Canaud B, My H, Morena M et al. Dialock: a new vascular access device for extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Preliminary clinical results. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.14(3), 692–698 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarello F, Forneris G, Formica M et al. Dialock® subcutaneous port for hemodialysis: a twelve-month experience in a single center. J. Vasc. Access2(2), 73–79 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Nam HY, Kwon T et al. Paclitaxel-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene haemodialysis grafts inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in porcine model of graft stenosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.21(9), 2432–2438 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avci-Adali M, Ziemer G, Wendel HP. Induction of EPC homing on biofunctionalized vascular grafts for rapid in vivo self-endothelialization – a review of current strategies. Biotechnol. Adv.28(1), 119–129 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould WR, Leadley RJ. Recent advances in the discovery and development of direct coagulation factor Xa inhibitors. Curr. Pharm. Des.9(28), 2337–2347 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubitza D, Becka M, Wensing G, Voith B, Zuehlsdorf M. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 59–7939 – an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor – after multiple dosing in healthy male subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.61(12), 873–880 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astapova EV, Stachura ME, Chernecky C, Rosenkoetter MM. Low-end videoconferencing for vascular access device site assessment in homecare. J. Assoc. Vasc. Access13(3), 135–138 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Eloot S, Dhondt A, Hoeben H, Vanholder R. Comparison of different methods to assess fistula flow. Blood Purif.30(2), 89–95 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Zeman HD, Lovhoiden G, Vrancken C. The clinical evaluation of vein contrast enhancement. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.2, 1203–1206 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi M, Hosokawa K. Visualized sclerotherapy of varicose veins. Dermatol. Surg.36(Suppl. 2), 1050–1055 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Heidenheim AP, Leitch R, Kortas C, Lindsay RM. Patient monitoring in the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis.42(1 Suppl.), 61–65 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Gatzoulis L, Iakovidis I. Wearable and portable eHealth systems. Technological issues and opportunities for personalized care. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.26(5), 51–56 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymberis A, Olsson S. Intelligent biomedical clothing for personal health and disease management: state of the art and future vision. Telemed. J. E. Health.9(4), 379–386 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng JW, Zhang ZB, Wu TH, Zhang Y. A wearable mobihealth care system supporting real-time diagnosis and alarm. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.45(9), 877–885 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giansanti D, Macellari V, Maccioni G. Telemonitoring and telerehabilitation of patients with Parkinson’s disease: health technology assessment of a novel wearable step counter. Telemed. J. E. Health14(1), 76–83 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly P, Cotton C, Morin F. Opportunities at the skin interface for continuous patient monitoring: a reverse iontophoresis model tested on lactate and glucose. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience1(1), 37–41 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sixsmith A, Hine N, Neild I, Clarke N, Brown S, Garner P. Monitoring the well-being of older people. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil.23(1), 9–23 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes TL, Abendroth F, Adami A, Pavel M, Zitzelberger TA, Kaye JA. Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement.4(6), 395–405 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek HJ, Lee HB, Kim JS, Choi JM, Kim KK, Park KS. Nonintrusive biological signal monitoring in a car to evaluate a driver’s stress and health state. Telemed. J. E. Health15(2), 182–189 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli M, Phee LSJ. Energy sources and their development for application in medical devices. Expert Rev. Med. Devices7(5), 693–709 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi ES, Leising RA, Spillman DM et al. Lithium batteries for medical applications. In: Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology. Nazri G-A, Pistoia G (Eds). Springer, NY, USA, 686–700 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Peng B, Cheng F, Tao Z, Chen J. Lithium transport at silicon thin film: barrier for high-rate capability anode. J. Chem. Phys.133(3), 034701 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nishide H, Oyaizu K. Materials science. Toward flexible batteries. Science319(5864), 737–738 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport A, Gura V, Ronco C, Beizai M, Ezon C, Rambod E. A wearable haemodialysis device for patients with end-stage renal failure: a pilot study. Lancet370(9604), 2005–2010 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooman JP, Van Der Sande FM, Leunissen KML. The long road to wearable blood-cleansing devices. Blood Purif.25(4), 377–382 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ronco C, Fecondini L. The vicenza wearable artificial kidney for peritoneal dialysis (ViWAK PD). Blood Purif.25(4), 383–388 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DBN, Roberts M. A peritoneal-based automated wearable artificial kidney. Clin. Exp. Nephrol.12(3), 171–180 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gura V, Ronco C, Nalesso F et al. A wearable hemofilter for continuous ambulatory ultrafiltration. Kidney Int.73(4), 497–502 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fissell WH, Fleischman AJ, Humes HD, Roy S. Development of continuous implantable renal replacement: past and future. Transl. Res.150(6), 327–336 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley HH, Gorsuch R, Peters H et al. Slow continuous intravenous plasmapheresis (SCIP): clinical applications and hemostability of extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Contrib. Nephrol.149, 334–342 (2005).
   Google Scholar