309
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer

Pages 851-857 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N et al. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Pathol.55(4), 244–265 (2002).
  • WHO. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. human papillomaviruses. WHO Press90, 1–689 (2007).
  • Basu P, Sarkar S, Mukherjee S et al. Women’s perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India. Cancer Detect. Prev.30(4), 369–374 (2006).
  • Stark A, Gregoire L, Pilarski R et al.Human papillomavirus, cervical cancer and women’s knowledge. Cancer Detect Prev.32(1), 15–22 (2008).
  • IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer Preventive Strategies. Cervix cancer screening. In: IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. (Volume 10). IARC Press, Lyon, France (2005).
  • Arbyn M, Autier P, Ferlay J. Burden of cervical cancer in the 27 member states of the European Union: estimates for 2004. Ann. Oncol.18(8), 1423–1425 (2007).
  • Arbyn M, Primic-Zakelj M, Raifu AO et al. The burden of cervical cancer in south-east Europe at the beginning of the 21st Century. Coll. Antropol.31(Suppl. 2), 7–10 (2007).
  • WHO. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: a Guide to Essential Practice. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland (2006).
  • von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G et al. Cancer screening in the European Union. In: Report on the Implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening (First Report). International Agency for Research on Cancer, European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (2008).
  • Anttila A, von Karsa L, Aasmaa A et al.Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer DOI:1 0.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.020 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM et al. The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union. Eur. J. Cancer DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.016 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Nicula FA, Anttila A, Neamtiu L et al.Challenges in starting organised screening programmes for cervical cancer in the new member states of the European Union. Eur. J. Cancer DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.025 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
  • European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening (Second Edition). Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J et al. (Eds). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (2008).
  • Lévy-Bruhl D, Bousquet V, King LA et al. The current state of introduction of HPV vaccination into national immunisation schedules in Europe: results of the VENICE 2008 Survey. Eur. J. Cancer DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.023 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am. J. Epidemiol.141(7), 680–689 (1995).
  • Karnon J, Peters J, Platt J et al. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol. Assess.8(20), iii, 1–78 (2004)
  • Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Thomson C et al. HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol.10(7), 672–682 (2009).
  • Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P et al. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology. Obstet. Gynecol.111(1), 167–177 (2008).
  • Arbyn M, Buntinx F, Van Ranst M et al. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Natl Cancer Inst.96(4), 280–293 (2004).
  • Cuzick J, Sasieni P, Davies P et al. A systematic review of the role of human papilloma virus (HPV) testing within a cervical screening programme: summary and conclusions. Br. J. Cancer83(5), 561–565 (2000).
  • Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Buntinx F et al. Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate.J. Cell Mol. Med.13(4), 648–659 (2009).
  • Cuzick J, Szarewski A, Cubie Het al. Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study. Lancet362(9399), 1871–1876 (2003).
  • Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int. J. Cancer119(5), 1095–1101 (2006).
  • Grce M, Davies P. Human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.8(5), 599–605 (2008).
  • Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet370(9601), 1764–1772 (2007).
  • Cuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan Ret al. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine26(Suppl. 10), K29–K41 (2008).
  • Qiao YL, Sellors JW, Eder PS et al.A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a crosssectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. Lancet Oncol.9(10), 929–936 (2008).
  • Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS et al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N. Engl. J. Med.360(14), 1385–1394 (2009).
  • Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P et al. Use of p16-INK4A overexpression to increase the specificity of human papillomavirus testing: a nested substudy of the NTCC randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol.9(10), 937–945 (2008).
  • FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N. Engl. J. Med.356(19), 1915–1927 (2007).
  • Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet374(9686), 301–314 (2009).
  • Brown DR, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K et al.The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in generally HPV-naive women aged 16–26 years. J. Infect. Dis.199(7), 926–935 (2009).
  • Wheeler CM, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K et al.The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in sexually active women aged 16–26 years. J. Infect. Dis.199(7), 936–944 (2009).
  • Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M et al.Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer88(1), 63–73 (2003).
  • Franco EL, Cuzick J, Hildesheim A, de Sanjosé S. Chapter 20: issues in planning cervical cancer screening in the era of HPV vaccination. Vaccine24(Suppl. 3), 171–177 (2006).
  • Gao S. Development of HPV and HEV vaccines. Presented at: 8th Developing Countries Vaccine Manufacturers’ Network (DCVMN) Annual General Meeting. Rio de Janiero, Brazil, 12 November 2007.

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.