Interpretation of differential item functioning analyses using external review

References

• Holland PW, Wainer H. Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Groenvold M, Petersen MA. The role and use of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of quality of life data from clinical trials. In: Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials. Fayers P, Hays R (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 195–208 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Benson J, Hutchinson SR. The state of the art in bias research in the United States. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol.47, 281–294 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussos L, Stout W. A multidimensionality-based DIF analysis paradigm. Appl. Psychol. Meas.20, 355–371 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl MJ, Khaliq SN. Identifying sources of differential item functioning on translated achievement tests: a confirmatory analysis. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA, USA, 24–27 April (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Gierl MJ, Rogers WT, Klinger DA. Using statistical and judgmental reviews to identify and interpret translation differential item functioning. Alberta J. Educ. Res.45, 353–376 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard G, Davis M, Hansche L. Evaluating the accuracy of judgments obtained from item review committees. Applied Measurement Educ.12, 199–210 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK, Jones RW. Comparison of empirical and judgmental procedures for detecting differential item functioning. Educ. Res. Quarterly18, 21–35 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Allalouf A, Hambleton R, Sireci S. Identifying the causes of translation DIF on verbal items. J. Educ. Measurement36, 185–198 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhan G, Gierl MJ. Evaluating the comparability of English- and French-speaking examinees on a science achievement test administered using two-stage testing. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Chicago, IL, USA, 22–24 April (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan K. Disentangling sources of differential item functioning in multilanguage assessments. Int. J. Testing2, 199–215 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan KE, Bachman LF. Differential item functioning on two tests of EFL proficiency. Language Testing9, 12–29 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Huang CD, Church AT, Katigbak MS. Identifying cultural differences in items and traits – differential item functioning in the NEO personality inventory. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.28, 192–218 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azocar F, Arean P, Miranda J, Munoz RF. Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory. J. Clin. Psychol.57, 355–365 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avlund K, Era P, Davidsen M, GausNilsson I. Item bias in self-reported functional ability among 75-year-old men and women in three Nordic localities. Scand. J. Soc. Med.24, 206–217 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt S, Mühlan H, Power M. The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur. J. Public Health Adv. Access16, 420–428 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis BB. Differential item functioning – implications for test translations. J. Appl. Psychol.74, 912–921 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulin CL, Mayer LJ. Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the job descriptive index into Hebrew. J. Appl. Psychol.71, 83–94 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price LR, Oshima TC. Differential item functioning and language translation: a cross-national study with a test developed for certification. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA, USA, 13–17 April (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Iwata N, Buka S. Race/ethnicity and depressive symptoms: a cross-cultural/ethnic comparison among university students in East Asia, North and South America. Soc. Sci. Med.55, 2243–2252 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano IS, Gotay CC. Ethnic differential item functioning in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients. Health Qual. Life Outcomes3, 1–10 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P. Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J. Clin. Epidemiol.51, 1189–1202 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez M, Teresi JA, Holmes D, Gurrland B, Lantigua R. Differential item functioning (DIF) and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Med. Care44, S95–S106 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump TE, Monahan P, McHorney CA. Differential item functioning in the short portable mental status questionnaire. Res. Aging27, 355–384 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sireci SG, Berberoglu G. Using bilingual respondents to evaluate translated-adapted items. Appl. Meas. Edu.13, 229–248 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt AP, Holland PW, Dorans NJ. Evaluating hypotheses about differential item functioning. In: Differential Item Functioning. Holland PW, Wainer H (Eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA 281–316 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Teresi JA. Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Med. Care44, S152–S170 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK. Good practices for identifying differential item functioning. Med. Care44, S182–S188 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercikan K. Translation effects in international assessment. Int. J. Educ. Res.29, 543–553 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med. Care42, 37–48 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen MA, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire. Qual. Life Res.12, 373–385 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott NW, Fayers PM, Bottomley A et al. Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses. Qual. Life Res.15, 1103–1115 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK et al.. The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual. Life Res.16, 115–129 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar