References
- Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Swartz N. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. Jossey-Bass Inc., CA, USA (1996).
- Willis GB, Royston P, Bercini D. The use of verbal report methods in the development and testing of survey questionnaires. Appl. Cogn. Psychol.5, 251–267 (1991).
- Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M et al. PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual. Life. Res.19, 1087–1096 (2010).
- Rat A-C, Pouchot J, Guillemin F et al. Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. Int. J. Qual. Health. Care.19(6), 390–398 (2007).
- Leidy NK, Vernon M. Perspectives on patient-reported outcomes: content validity and qualitative research in a changing clinical trial environment. Pharmacoeconomics26(5), 363–370 (2008).
- Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, Tourangeau R (Eds). National Academy Press, DC, USA, 73–100 (1984).
- Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Willis GB (Ed.). Sage, CA, USA (2005).
- Gerber E, Keeley C, Wellens T. Census Rules and Rostering Decisions: a Vignette Study. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Methods Research. American Statistical Association, VA, USA (1997).
- Beatty PC. Cognitive interviewing: the use of cognitive interviews to evaluate ePRO instruments. In: ePro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data. Byrom B, Tiplady B (Eds). Gower, Surrey, UK, 2–48 (2010).
- Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing. Public. Opin. Q.71(2), 287–311 (2007).
- Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT et al. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public. Opin Q.68(1), 109–130 (2004).
- Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual. Life Res.12, 229–238 (2003).
- Christodoulou C, Junghaenel DU, DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Stone AA. Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Qual. Life Res.17(10), 1239–1246 (2008).
- Willis GB, Reeve BB, Barofsky I. The use of cognitive interviewing techniques in quality-of-life and patient-reported outcomes assessment. In: Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Method. Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 610–622 (2004).
- de Leeuw E, Borgers N, Smits A. Pretesting questionnaires for children and adolescents. In: Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP et al. (Eds). Wiley, NJ, USA, 409–429 (2004).
- Willis G, DeMaio T, Harris-Kojetin B. Is the bandwagon headed to the methodological promised land? Evaluation of the validity of cognitive interviewing techniques. In: Cognition and Survey Research. Sirken M, Herrmann D, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur J, Tourangeau R (Eds). Wiley, NY, USA, 133–153 (1999).
- Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychol. Rev.87, 215–251 (1980).
- Forsyth BH, Lessler JT. Cognitive laboratory methods: a taxonomy. In: Measurement Errors in Surveys. Biemer PB, Groves RM, Lysberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S (Eds). John Wiley and Sons, NY, USA, 393–418 (1991).
- Forsyth B, Rothgeb JM, Willis GB. Does pretesting make a difference? An experimental test. In: Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP et al. (Eds). Wiley, NJ, USA, 525–546 (2004).
- Miller K. Q-Bank: Development of a Tested-Question Database, Proceedings of the ASA Section on Government Statistics. American Statistical Association, VA, USA (2005).
Websites
- PROMIS Overview. www.nihpromis.org/about/overview (Accessed 19 September 2011)
- NIH Toolbox Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function. www.nihtoolbox.org/default.aspx (Accessed 19 September 2011)
- NeuroQOL Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders. Overview. www.neuroqol.org/Web%20Pages/overview.aspx (Accessed 19 September 2011)
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. December 2009. www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatory Information/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf (Accessed 30 March 2011)
- American Academy of Pediatrics. www.aap.org (Accessed 20 March 2011)