References
- Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109.
- Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Standard errors associated with progress monitoring outcomes from DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an experimental passage set. School Psychology Review, 38, 266–283.
- Betts, J., Pickart, M., & Heistad, D. (2009). An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating for alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.001
- Christ, T. J., & Ardoin, S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.004
- Christ, T. J., Monaghen, B. D., Zopluoglu, C., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Evaluation of growth estimates derived with pre-post assessment methods. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(3), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508412456417
- Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
- Deno, S. L. (2016). Data-based decision-making. In S. R.Jimerson, M. K.Burns, & A. M.VanDerHeyden, (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_2
- Dunbar, S., & Welch, C. (n.d.). Reporting Iowa Proficiency Using Standard Scores. Retrieved from https://itp.education.uiowa.edu/ia/documents/Reporting-Iowa-Proficiency-Using-Standard-Scores.pdf
- FastBridge Learning. (2015). FAST technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: Theodore J. Christ and Colleagues, LLC.
- Ford, J. W., Missall, K. N., Hosp, J. L., & Kuhle, J. L. (2016). Comparing two CBM maze selection tools: Considering scoring and interpretive metrics for universal screening. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32, 329–353.
- Francis, D. J., Santi, K. L., Barr, C., Fletcher, J. M., Varisco, A., & Foorman, B. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003
- Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1998). Competing visions for educating students with disabilities: Inclusion versus full inclusion. Childhood Education, 74, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1998.10521956
- Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_6
- Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299105700603
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
- Gilbert, J. K., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Early screening for risk of reading disabilities: Recommendations for a four-step screening system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508412451491
- Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades ( Tech. Rep. No. 10). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
- Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. J. (2011). DIBELS next technical manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.
- Good, R. H., & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment, 12(2), 179–193.
- Graney, S. B., Missall, K. N., Martínez, R. S., & Bergstrom, M. (2009). A preliminary investigation of within-year growth patterns in reading and mathematics curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.12.001
- Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.3
- Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204–217.
- Hintze, J. M., Owen, S. V., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088778
- Hoover, H., Dunbar, S., & Frisbie, D. (2001). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) forms A, B, and C. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
- Hosp, J. (2012). Using assessment data to make decisions about teaching and learning. In K.Harris, S.Graham, T.Urdan, A. G.Bus, S.Major, & H. L.Swanson, (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (pp. 87–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-005
- Hosp, J., Hosp, M., Howell, K., & Allison, R. (2014). ABCs of curriculum-based evaluation: A practical guide to effective decision making. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Hosp, J. L., & Suchey, N. (2014). Reading assessment: Reading fluency, reading fluently, and comprehension-commentary on the special topic. School Psychology Review, 43, 59–69.
- Hosp, M., Hosp, J., & Howell, K. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Iowa Assessments. (n.d.). Form E SCOPE & SEQUENCE for Iowa Students. Retrieved from http://itp.education.uiowa.edu/ia/documents/Iowa_Form_E_F_Scope_and_Sequence.pdf
- Koehler-Hak, K. M. (2014). Measurement of educational progress in the context of local demographics: Using general outcome measurement as a basis for the development and use of local norms. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.760511
- Leblanc, M., Dufore, E., & McDougal, J. (2012). Using general outcome measures to predict student performance on state-mandated assessments: An applied approach for establishing predictive cutscores. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643753
- McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.
- Patton, K. L. S., Reschly, A. L., & Appleton, J. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement as a predictor of performance on a state assessment: Diagnostic efficiency of local norms. Educational Assessment, 19, 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.964117
- Pearson Education. (2011). AIMSweb default cut scores explained. State Prediction User’s Guide. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/wp-content/uploads/AIMSweb_Default_Cut_Score_Guide.pdf
- Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300403
- Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Shinn, M., & Shinn, M. (2002). AIMSweb® training workbook. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
- Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00071
- Sprinthall, R. C. (2003). The hypothesis of difference. Basic Statistical Analysis, 229–269.
- Stewart, L. H. (2014). Best practices in developing academic local norms. In P. L.Harrison & A.Thomas, (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Foundations (pp. 301–314). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
- Student Record Form: Curriculum-Based Measurement: Oral Reading Fluency. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.jimwrightonline.com/pdfdocs/cbmresources/cbmscoreforms/rdngForm.pdf
- Swets, J. A. (1992). The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47, 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.4.522
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- 2006 Hasbrouck & Tindal Oral Reading Fluency Data. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/content/pdfs/Hasbrouck-Tindal_chart.pdf
- VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2005). Quantifying context in assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161–183.
- Wayman, M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401