Cross-Modality Generalization in Reading and Spelling Instruction

References

• Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J., Treiman, R., Wilf, J. F., & Kellman, P. (1980). Spelling and reading by rules. In U.Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 159–194). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, R. W. (1980). Visual and phonological strategies in reading and spelling. In U.Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 195–214). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, P. J., Skinner, C. H., & Ferkis, M. (1995). Effects of response and trial repetition on sight-word training for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 347–348. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P. E., & Bradley, L. (1980). Why children sometimes write words which they do not read. In U.Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 355–372). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first; read later. Childhood Education, 47, 296–299.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, N. J. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 869–878. doi:10.1037/a0012544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Early spelling acquisition: Writing beats the computer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 159–162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J.,III, Chafouleas, S. M., Persampieri, M., Bonfiglio, C. M., & LaFleur, K. (2004). Teaching phoneme segmenting and blending as critical early literacy skills: An experimental analysis of minimal textual repertoires. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 165–178. doi:10.1023/B:JOBE.0000037627.51167.ea
   Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., & Kupzyk, S. (2013). Teaching reading. In G. J.Madden (Ed.), APA handbook of behavior analysis (pp. 405–423). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmoor, J. A. (1995a). Stimulus control: I. The Behavior Analyst, 18(1), 51–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinsmoor, J. A. (1995b). Stimulus control: II. The Behavior Analyst, 18(2), 253–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1980). The Developmental of Orthographic Images. In U.Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 312–338). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P.Gough, L.Ehri, & R.Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Breier, J. I., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24(2 & 3), 613–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., & Petscher, Y. (2010). Development of spelling and differential relations to text reading in grades 3-12. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(1), 7–20. doi:10.1177/1534508410379844201036:7
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U.Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–516). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gickling, E. E., & Armstrong, D. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 559–566. doi:10.1177/​002221947801100905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupzyk, S., Daly, E. J., & Anderson, M. N. (2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 781–792. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linan-Thompson, S., & Vaughn, S. (2010). Evidence-based reading instruction: Developing and implementing reading programs at the core, supplemental, and intervention levels. In G. G.Peacock, R. A.Ervin, E. J.Daly, III, & K. W.Merrell (Eds.), Practical handbook of school psychology: Effective practices for the 21st century (pp. 274–286). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Pages/smallbook.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G. H., Connell, J. E., & Duhon, G. J. (2006). Spontaneous response generalization during whole word instruction: Reading to spell and spelling to read. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 121–130. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9016-8
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.). (1997). Learning to spell. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. W., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Guiltinan, S. (1988). The effectiveness of a constant time-delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H. (2008). Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review, 37, 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student response rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 30(2), 139–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgeson, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voelier, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58. doi:10.1177/002221940103400104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. (2000). Children's written and oral spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmington, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2014). Enhancing the learning of new words using an errorless learning procedure: Evidence from typical adults. Memory, 22(5), 582–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. F., Fey, M. E., & Yoder, P. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiser, B., & Mathes, P. (2011). Using encoding instruction to improve the reading and spelling performances of elementary students at risk for literacy difficulties: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 81, 170–200. doi:10.3102/0034654310396719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar