References
- AltmanD. G. (1998). Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. British Medical Journal, 317, 1309–1312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309
- BaraldiA. N.EndersC. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
- BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention programs for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.
- ChristT. J.ScullinS.TolbizeA.JibanC. L. (2008). Implications of recent research: Curriculum-based measurement of math computation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 198–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508407313480
- CookR. J.SackettD. L. (1995). The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. British Medical Journal, 310, 452–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452
- DurlakJ. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 917–928. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
- FixsenD. L.BlaséK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 531–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549
- FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001174
- FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HollenbeckK. H.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (2011). Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 372–380. doi:https://doi.org/0.1177/0022219411407867
- GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 146–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
- GreenwoodC. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
- HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
- JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
- KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1999). Effectiveness of special education. In ReynoldsC. R.GutkinT. B. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 984–1024). New York: Wiley.
- KazdinA. E., (2008). Evidence-based treatment: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146
- KovaleskiJ.VanDerHeydenA. M.ShapiroE. (2013). The RtI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
- KratochwillT. R.StoiberK. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.4.341.20872
- LaupacisA.SackettD. L.RobertsR. S. (1988). An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 1728–1733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198806303182605
- LevineM. N.GafniA.MarkhamB.MacFarlaneD. (1992). A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 117, 53–58.
- McAlisterF. A.StrausS. E.GuyattG. H.HaynesR. B. (2000). Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient: Based on the users' guides to evidence-based medicine and reproduced with permission from JAMA, 283, 2829–2836. Retrieved March 26, 2013, from Centre for Health Evidence website: http://www.cche.net/text/usersguides/integrating.asp
- MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuO. (2011). Kindergarten children's growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 472–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411414010
- National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2011). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 14, 2013, from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
- NoellG. H.WittJ. C.SliderN. J.ConnellJ. E.GattiS. L.WilliamsK. L.KoenigJ. L.ResetarJ. L.DuhonG. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
- NomiT. (2012). The unintended consequences of an algebra-for-all policy on high-skill students: Effects on instructional organization and students' academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 489–505.
- NuovoJ.MelnikowJ.ChangD. (2002). Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials. JAMA, 287, 2813–2814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2813
- O'ConnorR. E.BocianK.Beebe-FrankenbergerM.LinklaterD. L. (2010). Responsiveness of students with language difficulties to early intervention in reading. Journal of Special Education, 43, 220–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908317789
- Pearson. (2010). Technical update for 2009–2010 test administration.
- PeughJ. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
- RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed). New York, NY: Free Press.
- SchulteA. C.MurrN.OsbeckK.MudholkarP. (2014). Measurement in school consultation research. In ErchulW.SheridanS. (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 43–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
- SchulzK. F.AltmanD. G.MoherD., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med, 7(3), e1000251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251
- ShinnM. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
- SlavinR. E.LakeC. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 427–515.
- The Cochrane Collaboration. (2002). http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/html/mod11-6.htm
- VanDerHeydenA. M.McLaughlinT.AlginaJ.SnyderP. (2012). Randomized evaluation of a supplemental grade-wide mathematics intervention. American Education Research Journal, 49, 1251–1284. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212462736
- VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C. (2005). Quantifying the context of assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161–183.
- VannemanA.HamiltonL.Baldwin AndersonJ.RahmanT. (2009). Achievement gaps: How black and white students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2009–455). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2012). What Works Clearinghouse reporting guide for study authors. Retrieved August 14, 2013, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_gsa_v1.pdf
- YusufS.WittesJ.ProbstfieldJ.TyrolerH. A. (1991). Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA, 266, 93–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470010097038
- ZhangJ.YuK. F. (1998). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA, 280, 1690–1691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.19.1690