Male Superiority in Mathematical Aptitude: An Artifact

References Cited

• Aiken, L. R. 1979 Attitudes Toward Mathematics and Science in Iranian Middle Schools. School Science and Mathematics 79: 229–234.
   Google Scholar
• Alper, J. S. 1985 Sex Differences in Brain Asymmetry: A Critical Analysis. Feminist Studies 11(1): 7–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P. 1983 Adolescence of the Mathematically Precocious: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study. In Academic Precocity: Aspects of Its Development. C. P. Benbow and J. C. Stanley eds. Pp. 9–37. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P. 1986a Sex-Related Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability Among Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Characterization, Consequences, and Possible Explanations. Presented at AAAS annual meeting, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P. 1986b Physiological Correlates of Extreme Intellectual Precocity. Neuropsychologia 24(5): 719–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and R. M. Benbow 1984 Biological Correlates of High Mathematical Reasoning Ability. Progress in Brain Research 61: 469–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and J. C. Stanley 1980 Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact? Science 210: 1262–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and J. C. Stanley 1981 Letter. Science 242: 117–118.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and J. C. Stanley 1982a Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective. American Educational Research Journal 19(4): 598–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and J. C. Stanley 1982b Intellectually Talented Boys and Girls: Educational Profiles. Gifted Child Quarterly 26(2): 82–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., and J. C. Stanley 1983 Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning: More Facts. Science 222: 1029–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, S. E. 1983 Who Will Do Science? Minority and Female Attainment of Science and Mathematics Degrees: Trends and Causes. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bleier, R. 1984 Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1977 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., and H. Zuckerman 1987 Marriage, Motherhood and Research Performance in Science. Scientific American 256(2): 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, M. F., and M. J. Lane 1986 Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, R. 1982 Sex Differences in Geometry Achievement. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, D. 1986 Britain's Royal Society Condemns Sex Bias in Math Teaching. Science 233: 618–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and J. E. Jacobs 1986 Social Forces Shape Math Attitudes and Performance. Signs 11(2): 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshiwani, S. S. 1975 Sex Differences in the Learning of Mathematics Among Kenyan School Students. Kenya Educational Review 2: 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., and J. Sherman 1977 Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization, and Sociocultural Factors. American Educational Research Journal 14: 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., and J. Sherman 1978 Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 9: 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, E. B. 1986 Colleges in U.S. Need Overhaul, Study Contends. The New York Times, November 2.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L. H., D. Tobin, and L. Brody 1979 Sex-Role Socialization and Achievement in Mathematics. In Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning: Developmental Issues. M. A. Wittig and A. C. Petersen eds. Pp. 303–332. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, J. 1986 Low S.A.T. Scores Perplex Women. The New York Times, August 4.
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, N., and P. Behan 1982 Left-Handedness: Association with Immune Disease, Migraine, and Developmental Learning Disorder. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 795097-5100.
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, N., and A. M. Galaburda 1985 Cerebral Lateralization: Biological Mechanisms, Associations, and Pathology: Hypotheses and a Program for Research. Archives of Neurology 42: 428–459, 521-552, 634-654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. M., and B. Sandler 1982 The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. J. 1978 Sex Difference in Spatial Ability: Possible Environmental, Genetic, and Neurological Factors. In Asymmetrical Function of the Brain. M. Kinsbourne ed. Pp. 405–422. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. 1981 How Large are Cognitive Gender Differences? American Psychologist 36: 892–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., ed. 1981 The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., A. M. Seewald, and M. Engel 1979 Learning What's Taught: Sex Differences in Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 71(4): 432–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E., and C. N. Jacklin 1974 The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D. 1985 None of the Above: Behind the Myth of Scholastic Aptitude. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. 1986 Women's Work. Science 867(4): 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Safilios-Rothschild, C. 1986 Sex Differences in Early Socialization and Upbringing and their Consequences for Educational Choices and Outcomes. In Girls and Women in Education: A Cross-National Study of Sex Inequalities in Upbringing in Schools and Colleges. Pp. 30–56. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp-Kündiger, E., ed. 1982 An International Review on Gender and Mathematics. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Senk, S., and Z. Usiskin 1983 Geometry Proof Writing: A New View of Sex Differences in Mathematics Ability. American Journal of Education 91(2): 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, W. V., and D. Porter 1980 The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Critical Appraisal. Harvard Educational Review 50(2): 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, E. K. 1981 Commentary on Women in Math. Association of Women in Mathematics Newsletter 11(4): 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. W., S.-Y. Lee, and J. W. Stigler 1986 Mathematics Achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children. Science 231: 693–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swetz, F. J., H. Langgulung, and A. R. Jahar 1983 Attitudes Toward Mathematics and School Learning in Malaysia and Indonesia: Urban-Rural and Male-Female Dichotomies. Comparative Education Review 27: 394–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, J. M. 1978 Fetus Into Man: Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomizuka, C., and S. Tobias 1981 Mathematical Ability: Is Sex a Factor? Science 212: 114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wald, M. L. 1987 A Thicker Foreign Accent. The New York Times, January 4.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1975 Sociobiology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar