Advanced search
Publication Cover
Future Science OA Volume 6, 2020 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
964
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology

Integrating Computational Lead Optimization Diagnostics With Analog Design and Candidate Selection

Dimitar Yonchev1 Department of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Endenicher Allee 19c, Bonn, D-53113, Germany
&
Jürgen Bajorath1 Department of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Endenicher Allee 19c, Bonn, D-53113, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
Article: FSO451 | Received 15 Nov 2019, Accepted 20 Dec 2019, Published online: 24 Jan 2020

References

  • The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. 3rd Edition. WermuthCG (Ed.). Academic Press-Elsevier, CA, USA (2008).
  • LillMA. Multi-dimensional QSAR in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today12(23–24), 1013–1017 (2007).
  • CherkasovA , MuratovEN , FourchesDet al.QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?J. Med. Chem.57(12), 4977–5010 (2014).
  • SegallM. Advances in multi-parameter optimization methods for de novo drug design. Expert Opin. Drug Discov.9(7), 803–817 (2014).
  • MunsonM , LiebermanH , TserlinEet al.Lead optimization attrition analysis (LOAA): a novel and general methodology for medicinal chemistry. Drug Discov. Today20(8), 978–987 (2015).
  • ShanmugasundaramV , ZhangL , KayasthaS , dela Vega de Leoón A , DimovaD , BajorathJ. Monitoring the progression of structure–activity relationship information during lead optimization. J. Med. Chem.59(9), 4235–4244 (2015).
  • MaynardAT , RobertsCD. Quantifying, visualizing, and monitoring lead optimization. J. Med. Chem.59(9), 4189–4201 (2015).
  • VogtM , YonchevD , BajorathJ. Computational method to evaluate progress in lead optimization. J. Med. Chem.61(23), 10895–10900 (2018).
  • YonchevD , VogtM , BajorathJ. Compound optimization monitor (COMO) method for computational evaluation of progress in medicinal chemistry projects. Future Drug Discov.1(2), FDD15 (2019).
  • GaultonA , BellisLJ , BentoAPet al.ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res.40(D1), D1100–D1107 (2012).
  • NavejaJJ , VogtM , StumpfeD , Medina-FrancoJL , BajorathJ. Systematic extraction of analogue series from large compound collections using a new computational compound–core relationship method. ACS Omega4(1), 1027–1032 (2019).
  • GriffenE , LeachAG , RobbGR , WarnerDJ. Matched molecular pairs as a medicinal chemistry tool. J. Med. Chem.54(22), 7739–7750 (2011).
  • HussainJ , ReaC. Computationally efficient algorithm to identify matched molecular pairs (MMPs) in large data sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model.50(3), 339–348 (2010).
  • LewellXQ , JuddDB , WatsonSP , HannMM. RECAP – retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure: a powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.38(3), 511–522 (1998).
  • dela Vega de León A , BajorathJ. Matched molecular pairs derived by retrosynthetic fragmentation. Med. Chem. Commun.5(1), 64–67 (2014).
  • VapnikVN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. 2nd Edition. Springer, NY, USA (2000).
  • MarquardtDW , SneeRD. Ridge regression in practice. Am. Stat.29(1), 3–20 (1975).
  • DorugadeAV , KashidDN. Alternative method for choosing ridge parameter for regression. Appl. Math. Sci.4(9), 447–456 (2010).
  • JoachimsT. Making Large-scale SVM Learning Practical. In: Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. SchölkopfB, BurgesCJC, SmolaAJ (Eds). 169–184MIT Press, MA, USA (1999).
  • DruckerH , BurgesC. Support vector regression machines. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Systems9(1), 155–161 (1997).
  • SmolaAJ , SchölkopfB. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput.14(3), 199–222 (2004).
  • FreeSM , WilsonJW. A mathematical contribution to structure–activity studies. J. Med. Chem.7(4), 395–399 (1964).
  • KubinyiH. Free Wilson analysis. Theory, applications and its relationships to Hansch analysis. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat.7(3), 121–133 (1988).
  • HagbergA , SwartP , ChultDS. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, USA. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/960616
  • OEChemTK. OpenEye Scientific Software. Inc, NM, USA (2012). https://www.eyesopen.com/oechem-tk
  • BaumannD , BaumannK. Reliable estimation of prediction errors for QSAR models under model uncertainty using double cross-validation. J. Cheminform.6(1), e47 (2014).
  • PedregosaF , VaroquauxG , GramfortAet al.Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res.12(Oct), 2825–2830 (2011).
  • RogersD , HahnM. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Model.50(5), 742–754 (2010).
  • RDKit: open-source cheminformatics (2019). http://www.rdkit.org
  • RalaivolaL , SwamidassSJ , SaigoH , BaldiP. Graph kernels for chemical informatics. Neural Netw.18(8), 1093–1110 (2005).

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.