References
- HolmboeESWardDSReznickRKFaculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical educationAcad Med201186446046721346509
- WilliamsRGKlamenDAMcGaghieWCCognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratingsTeach Learn Med200315427029214612262
- PangaroLA new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluationsAcad Med199974111203120710587681
- HemmerPAPangaroLUsing formal evaluation sessions for case-based faculty development during clinical clerkshipsAcad Med200075121216122111112726
- DurningSJPangaroLNDentonGDIntersite consistency as a measurement of programmatic evaluation in a medicine clerkship with multiple, geographically separated sitesAcad Med200378Suppl 10S36S3814557090
- HauerKEMazottiLO’BrienBHemmerPATongLFaculty verbal evaluations reveal strategies used to promote medical student performanceMed Educ Online2011166354
- HemmerPADadekianGATerndrupCRegular formal evaluation sessions are effective as frame-of-reference training for faculty evaluators of clerkship medical studentsJ Gen Intern Med20153091313131826173519
- SteinertYMannKCentenoAA systemic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8Med Teach20062849752617074699
- BeijaardDDe VriesYBuilding expertise: a process perspective on the development or change of teachers’ beliefsEur J Teach Educ1997203243255
- ArreolaRADeveloping a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System3rd edBolton, MAAnker Publishing2007
- SargeantJMannKSinclairDvan der VleutenCMetsemakersJUnderstanding the influence of emotions and refection upon multi-source feedback and acceptance and useAdv Health Sci Educ200613275288
- BoerboomTBJaarsmaDDolmansDHScherpbierAJMastenbroekNJvan BeukelenPPeer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teachingMed Teach20113311e615e62322022915
- HemmerPAPappKKMechaberAJDurningSJEvaluation, grading, and use of the RIME vocabulary on internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey and comparison to other clinical clerkshipsTeach Learn Med200820211812618444197
- PangaroLInvesting in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessmentMed Teach20002247848121271960
- AlbaneseMAChallenges in using rater judgments in medical educationsJ Eval Clin Pract20006330531911083041
- GingerichAKoganJYeatesPGovaertsMHolmboeESeeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectivesMed Educ2014481055106825307633
- StalmeijerREDolmansDHWolfhagenIHPetersWGvan CoppenolleLScherpbierAJCombined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachersAdv Health Sci Educ2010153315328
- TorreDMSimpsonDSebastianJLElnickiDMLearning/teaching activities and high-quality teaching: perceptions of third year medical students during an inpatient rotationAcad Med2005801095095416186616
- BeckmanTJGhoshAKCookDAErwinPJMandrekarNJHow reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instrumentsJ Gen Med20049971977
- SieroFWBakkerABDekkerGBvan den BurgMTCChanging organizational energy consumption behavior through comparative feedbackJ Environ Psychol199616235246
- van der LeeuwRMSlootwegIAHeinemanMJLombartsKExplaining how faculty members act upon residents’ feedback to improve their teaching performanceMed Educ2013471089109824117555