Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations

References

• Yates J. When did they leave, and why? A retrospective case study of attrition on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:43. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin Y, Kealey L, Slade S, Hanson MD. Investigating Canadian medical school attrition metrics to inform socially accountable admissions planning. Med Teach. 2015. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1045847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiding principles for the admission of medical students, Revised March 2010. Available from: https://www.medschools.ac.uk/media/1931/guiding-principles-for-the-admission-of-medical-students.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Liason committee on medical education Available from: https://med.virginia.edu/ume-curriculum/wp-content/uploads/sites/216/2016/07/2017-18_Functions-and-Structure_2016-03-24.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Powis DA, Wakeford R, Ferguson E, James D, Richards P. Intellectual aptitude tests and A levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school. BMJ. 2005;331:555–559. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer A, Puddey IB. Admission selection criteria as predictor of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: a prospective study. Med Teach. 2011;1–8. doi:10.3109/0142159X2011.577123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, James D, O’Heir F, Sanders A. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ. 2003;326:429–432. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7386.429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Dowell J, McLachlan J, Nicholson S, Patterson F Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students. 2012. General Medical Council Available from: http://www.gmcuk.org/Identifying_best_practice_in_the_selection_of_medical_students.pdf_51119804.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2001;6:159–175. doi:10.1023/A:1011489618208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe P, Bristow D. Predicting medical student performance from attributes at entry: a latent class analysis. Med Educ. 2011;45:308–316. doi:10.1111/med.2011.45.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admission OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ. 2004;38:314–326. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01776.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1:41–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callwooda A, Cookea D, Bolgera S, Lemanskaa A, Allanb H. The reliability and validity of multiple mini interviews (MMIs) in values based recruitment to nursing, midwifery and paramedic practice programmes: findings from an evaluation study. IJNS. 2017;77:138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver T, Hecker K, Hausdorf PA, Conlon P. Validating MMI scores: are we measuring multiple attributes? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:379–392. doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9480-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell J, Lynch B, Till H, Kumwenda B, Husbands A. The multiple mini-interview in the UK context: 3 years of experience at Dundee. Med Teach. 2012;34:297–304. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.652706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayub R, Yousuf N, Asad M, Khan UA. Multiple mini interviews as a measure of non-cognitive skills for admissions into undergraduate medical education programme in Pakistan: a validity study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67:1905–1909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Rahim AF, Yusoff MSB. Validity evidence of a multiple mini interview for selection of medical students: Universiti Sains Malaysia experience. Educ Med J. 2016;8:49–63. doi:10.5959/eimj.v8i2.437
   Google Scholar
• Hecker K, Violato C. A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school multiple mini interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(4):331–336. doi:10.1080/10401334.2011.611769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AJ, MacKeigan LD. Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76:1. doi:10.5688/ajpe76110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, et al. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ. 2008;42:396–404. doi:10.1111/j.13652923.2008.03018.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebok SS, Luu K, Klinger DA. Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:71–84. doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9463-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Med Educ. 2009;43:573–579. doi:10.1111/med.2009.43.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore KL, Kreuger S, Ladhani M, et al. The reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions. Acad Med. 2010;85:S60–S63. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed442b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga JD, Oluwasanjo A, Wasser T, Donato A, Alweis R. Reliability and acceptability of a five-station multiple mini-interview model for residency program recruitment. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2013;3:21362. doi:10.3402/jchimp.v3i3-4.21362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim KJ, Nam KS, Kwon BS. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school. Korean J Med Educ. 2017;29(1):7–14. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.48
   Google Scholar
• Dodson M, Crotty B, Prideaux D, Ward A, de Leeuw E. The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough? Med Educ. 2009;43:168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijtdehaage S, Hy Doyle L, Parker N. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Acad Med. 2011;86:1032–1039. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223ab7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Sato J, Yoshimura H, et al. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:57. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Macala C. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: ‘tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Med Educ. 2014;48:604–613. doi:10.1111/medu.12402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagna-Vaillancourt M, Manoukian J, Razack S, Nguyen LHP. Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:91–96. doi:10.1002/lary.24122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin BN, Wilson IG. Interviewer bias in medical student selection. Med J Aust. 2010;193:343–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Shoaib H, Rehman R. Exploring the usefulness of interviewers’ training before and after Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) for undergraduate medical students’ selections: was it really helpful? Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32:1459–1463. doi:10.12669/pjms.326.11175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen MK, Lykkegaard E, Lund O, O’Neill LD. Qualitative analysis of MMI raters’ scorings of medical school candidates: a matter of taste? Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2018;23(2):289–310. doi:10.1007/s10459-017-9794-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaki SM, Shinawi LA, Yamani I, Hassan MHA, Tekian A, Park YS. Gathering validity evidence in the use of multiple mini-interviews as an admission tool for dental students: preliminary evidence from Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2016;38:S45–51. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1142510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairnay J. Validity. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 5th ed. UK. Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 227–250
   Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Clark T, Burgess A, Frommer M, Grant M, Mossman K. The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:1–11. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Bhardwaj S, Rahman E. Multiple mini-interview as a predictor of performance in the objective structured clinical examination among physician associates in the United Kingdom: a cohort study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:239–245. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S159412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AJ, MacKeigan LD, Mitsakakis N, Pugsley JA. Multiple mini-interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination. Med Educ. 2017;51:379–389. doi:10.1111/medu.2017.51.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshinsky A, Ziegler D, Gafni N. Multiple mini-interviews in the age of the internet: does preparation help applicants to medical school? Int J Test. 2017;17(3):253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin B, Wilson I. Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2012;17(3):377–388. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9316-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky G, Havmose P, Vang ML, Andersen TE, Nielsen T. The predictive validity of using admissions testing and multiple mini-interviews in undergraduate university admissions. High Educ Res Dev. 2017;36(5):1003–1016. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1263832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluwasanjo A, Wasser T, Alweis R. Correlation between MMI performance and OSCE performance – a pilot study. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015. doi:10.3402/jchimp.v5.27808
   Google Scholar
• Knorr M, Schwibbe A, Ehrhardt M, Lackamp J, Zimmermann S, Hampe W. Validity evidence for the Hamburg multiple mini-interview. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:1–12. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1208-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadad A, Gafni N, Moshinsky A, Turvall E, Ziv A, Israeli A. The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school. Med Teach. 2016;38:1172–1179. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope PY, Clendon S. The multiple mini-interview : a possible solution to problems associated with the interview processes for a selected entry allied health program. J Allied Health. 2017;46:e91–e95.
   Google Scholar
• Andrades M, Bhanji S, Kausar S, Majeed F, Pinjani S. Multiple Mini-Interviews (MMI) and semistructured interviews for the selection of family medicine residents : a comparative analysis. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;1–6. doi:10.1155/2014/747168
   Google Scholar
• Kelly ME, Dowell J, Husbands A, et al. The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population- a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:13. doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0267-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh H, Lee HJ, Park SB, et al. Multiple mini-interview in selecting medical students. KJME. 2009;21:103–115. doi:10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.103
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection. Fam Med. 2008;40:734–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Roberts C, Rothnie I, Fresne C, Walton M. multiple mini interviews Experiences of the multiple mini-interview : a qualitative analysis. Med Educ. 2009;43:360–367. doi:10.1111/med.2009.43.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razack S, Faremo S, Drolet F, Snell L, Wiseman J, Pickering J. assessment issues multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews : stakeholder acceptability comparison. Med Educ. 2009;43:993–1000. doi:10.1111/med.2009.43.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pau A, Chen YS, Kar V, Lee M, Sow CF, Alwis RD. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview? Med Educ Online. 2016;21:29874. doi:10.3402/meo.v21.29874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husbands A, Rodgerson MJ, Dowell J, Patterson F. Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions. BMC Med Educ. 2015;1–9. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopson LR, Burkhardt JC, Stansfield RB, Vohra T, Turner-lawrence D, Losman ED. The multiple mini-interview for emergency medicine resident selection. J Emerg Med. 2014;46:537–543. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker KG, Donnon T, Illanes O, Morck D. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method. JVME. 2009;36:166–173. doi:10.3138/jvme.36.2.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller D, Mara DO, Rothnie I, Dunn S, Lee L, Roberts C. selection Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes. Med Educ. 2013;43:801–810. doi:10.1111/medu.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn O. Can multiple mini interviews work in an Irish setting? A feasibility study. IMJ. 2016;107:6.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson HC, Townson AF, Finlayson H, Centre SR, Columbia B. Resident selection for a physical medicine and rehabilitation program. Am J Phys Rehabil. 2011;90:330–335. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820f9677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews. Med Educ. 2009;43:767–775. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hissbach JC, Sehner S, Harendza S, Hampe W. Cutting costs of multiple mini-interviews – changes in reliability and efficiency of the Hamburg medical school admission test between two applications. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:54. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter H, Eva K. Vive la difference: the freedom and inherent resposibilities when designing and implementing multiple mini interviews. Acad Med. 2018;93:969–971. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar