Determination and Comparison of the Factors Related to Effective Blended Learning in Medical Sciences from the Viewpoints of Instructors and Learners

References

• Barth M, Rieckmann M. Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. J Clean Prod. 2012;26:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadeeva Z, Mochizuki Y. Higher education for today and tomorrow: university appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development. Sustain Sci. 2010;5(2):249–256. doi:10.1007/s11625-010-0106-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):328. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twomey A. Web-based teaching in nursing: lessons from the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(6):452–458. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2004.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintu MJ, Zhu C, Kagambe E. Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ. 2017;14(1):7. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Llorente AM, Sánchez-Gómez MC, García-Peñalvo FJ, Casillas-Martín S. Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72:632–643. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Triana MJ, Prieto Santos LP, Vozniuk A, et al. Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: a systematic review. Int J Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;9(EPFL–ARTICLE–216019):126–150. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2017.084489
   Google Scholar
• Henrie CR, Bodily R, Manwaring KC, Graham CR. Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2015;16:3. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly R. Blended problem-based learning in higher education: the intersection of social learning and technology. Psychosociological Issues Hum Resour Manage. 2017;5:2.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216–e21. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SY. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ Techno Soc. 2009;12(3):150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens J. Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness. A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base. Springer; 2016:389.
   Google Scholar
• Flórez MT, Sammons P. Assessment for Learning: Effects and Impact. ERIC; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kington A, Sammons P, Day C, Regan E. Stories and statistics: describing a mixed methods study of effective classroom practice. J Mix Methods Res. 2011;5(2):103–125. doi:10.1177/1558689810396092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Christensen L. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Turner LA, Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:297–319.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Bustamante RM, Nelson JA. Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. J Mix Methods Res. 2010;4(1):56–78. doi:10.1177/1558689809355805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Spannagel C, Gläser-Zikuda M, Schroeder U, editors. Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in User-Program Interaction Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum. Qualitative Social Research; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Colaizzi PF. Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist Views It. Oxford University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. Jossey-Bass; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• AbuSneineh W, Zairi M An evaluation framework for e-learning effectiveness in the Arab world. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bersin J. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ostashewski NM, Reid D, Moisey S. Applying constructionist principles to online teacher professional development. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2011;12(6):143–156. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräs H, Kartoğlu Ü. A grounded theory of professional learning in an authentic online professional development program. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2017;18:7. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.2923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J-H, Tennyson RD, Hsia T-L. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput Educ. 2010;55(1):155–164. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez F, Guardiola J, Rodríguez ÓM, Alonso MÁM. Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Comput Educ. 2012;58(1):283–290. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Bures EM, Borokhovski E, Tamim RM. Interaction in Distance Education and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice. The Next Generation of Distance Education. Springer; 2012:49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock P, Lewis A. Putting improvement at the heart of health care: medical students need to learn continuous quality improvement skills as core skills. BMJ. 2002;325(7366):670. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7366.670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alayyar GM, Fisser P, Voogt J. Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: support from blended learning. Australas J Educ Technol. 2012;28:8. doi:10.14742/ajet.773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Quek CL, Hu X. Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: an educational design research. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2017;18:3. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel JH, Bulte AM, Verloop N. The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learn Instr. 2007;17(2):156–171. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams A, Ross D, Swain C, Dana N, Leite W, Sandbach R. Preparing teacher leaders in a job-embedded graduate program: changes within and beyond the classroom walls. Teach Educ Pract. 2013;26(3):581–598.
   Google Scholar
• Meher SK, Kurwal NS, Suri A. E-learning through telemedicine in neurosurgical teaching and patient care. Int J Telemedicine Clin Pract. 2017;2(1):2–11. doi:10.1504/IJTMCP.2017.082099
   Google Scholar
• Ryan S, Scott B, Freeman H, Patel D. The Virtual University: The Internet and Resource-Based Learning. Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Murugaiah P, Thang SM. Development of interactive and reflective learning among Malaysian online distant learners: an ESL instructor’s experience. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2010;11(3):21–41. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo A, Barra E, Gallego D, Quemada J, editors. An online e-Learning authoring tool to create interactive multi-device learning objects using e-Infrastructure resources. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); Oklahoma City, OK, USA; IEEE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Raisler J, O’Grady M, Lori J. Clinical teaching and learning in midwifery and women’s health. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003;48(6):398–406. doi:10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00304-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklin PJ, Kenworthy N. Teaching and Assessing in Nursing Practice: An Experiential Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Klein HJ, Noe RA, Wang C. Motivation to learn and course outcomes: the impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Pers Psychol. 2006;59(3):665–702. doi:10.1111/peps.2006.59.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe RT, Graham CR. Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. Q Rev Distance Educ. 2003;4(3):227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Knapper C, Cropley AJ. Lifelong Learning in Higher Education. Psychology Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bouras C, Tsiatsos T. Educational virtual environments: design rationale and architecture. Multimed Tools Appl. 2006;29(2):153–173. doi:10.1007/s11042-006-0005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perren L. The role of e-mentoring in entrepreneurial education and support: a meta-review of academic literature. Educ Trng. 2003;45(8/9):517–525. doi:10.1108/00400910310508900
   Google Scholar
• Bierema LL, Merriam SB. E-mentoring: using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovat Higher Educ. 2002;26(3):211–227. doi:10.1023/A:1017921023103
   Google Scholar