Practicing Peer Physical Examination by Medical and Allied Health Professions Students: Why the Hesitation and Where are We Now? A Narrative Literature Review

References

• Reid KJ, Kgakololo M, Sutherland RM, Elliott SL, Dodds AE. First-year medical students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(1):55–62. doi:10.1080/10401334.2012.641489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunath H, Venkatesh D, Taklikar RH, Vijayanath V. Medical student’s perception and preferences about peer physical examination (PPE). Asian J Health Sci. 2014;2(1). doi:10.15419/AJHS.V2I1.423
   Google Scholar
• Kahwage Neto SG, Braga TKK, Portella MB, Andriolo RB. The teaching of clinical skills and the applicability of a simplified guide for physical examination in the undergraduate medical program. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2017;41(4):457–467. doi:10.1590/1981-52712015v41n4RB20160110
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RC, Fagan MJ, Sebastian J. Teaching students the art and science of physical diagnosis. Am J Med. 2001;110(5):419–423. doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00621-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhrer JC. The importance of the history and physical in diagnosis. Nurse Practitioner. 2014;39(4):30–35. doi:10.1097/01.NPR.0000444648.20444.e6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz MA, Doty M. Why the history and physical examination still matter. JAAPA. 2016;29(3):41–45. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000480568.62755.72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau M, Könings KD, Touchie C. Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(302):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1403-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: time to revisit? Med J Aust. 2008;189(5):274–276. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02437.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Sato TJ. Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(1):103–121. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9094-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardakani EM, Theroux J, Beynon AM, Losco B. Exploring 1st- and 2nd-year chiropractic students’ willingness and attitudes toward peer physical examination. J Chiropr Educ. 2022;37(1):13–19. doi:10.7899/JCE-20-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Shulruf B. Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13(42):42. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan B, Grace S. Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(21):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12998-016-0102-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braunack-Mayer AJ. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Med Educ. 2001;35(7):681–686. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00970.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):957–964. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02557.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry GJ. Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(4):807–815. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9418-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattingh M, Labuschagne M. Health Sciences lecturers and students’ perspectives on the ethical aspects of peer physical examination (PPE). J Acad Ethics. 2019;17(4):375–387. doi:10.1007/s10805-019-09334-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JY, Yip ALM, Lam CLK, Patil NG. Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach. 2011;33(10):e528–e540. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.599893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soqia J, Shamaa MA, Alhomsi D, et al. Syrian medical students’ acceptance of peer physical examination and its associating factors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(898):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03985-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varsou O, Hughes A, Humphreys R, Laidlaw A. Medical Curriculum: How Do We Manage Incidental Findings in Educational Settings? Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(2):893–895. doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01211-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):243–253. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02401.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf NF, Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Stinson WW. Peer group models in examination instruction as an integral part of medical gross anatomy. J Med Educ. 1982;57(8):641–644. doi:10.1097/00001888-198208000-00013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vnuk AK, Wearn A, Rees CE. The influence of students’ gender on equity in Peer Physical Examination: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;22(3):653–665. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9699-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill PA, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman TL. Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach. 1998;20(5):433–437. doi:10.1080/01421599880526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henick D, Labkovich M, Radell JE, Chopra N, Chadha N. Medical student attitudes toward the use of peer physical exam for learning fundoscopy. J Acad Ophthalmol. 2022;14(1):e60–69. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1743582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):6–20. doi:10.1258/1355819054308576
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PRISMA. Welcome to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) website! 2023. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Med Writing. 2015;24(4):230–235. doi:10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
   Google Scholar
• Samadzadeh GR, Rigi T, Ganjali AR. Comparison of four search engines and their efficacy with emphasis on literature research in addiction (Prevention and Treatment). Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2013;1(4):166–171. doi:10.5812/ijhrba.6551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104:333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J. Evaluation of the acceptability of peer physical examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(111):1–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wearn AM, Bhoopatkar H, Mathew TK, Stewart L. Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(8):884–888. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid K, Sutherland R, Dodds A, McNair R, Pierce D. Abdomen and chest examinations in peer physical examination: variation in participation by gender. FoHPE. 2015;16(2):13–26. doi:10.11157/fohpe.v16i2.66
   Google Scholar
• Burggraf M, Kristin J, Wegner A, et al. Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1353-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tod D, Booth A, Smith B. Critical appraisal. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022;15(1):52–72. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2021.1952471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Evidence Based Management. Critical appraisal checklist for a cohort or panel study; 2014. Available from: https://cebma.org/assets/Uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-Cohort-or-Panel-Study-July-2014-1-v2.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2023.
   Google Scholar