Advanced search
Publication Cover
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Volume 4, 2013 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
169
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Group versus modified individual standard-setting on multiple-choice questions with the Angoff method for fourth-year medical students in the internal medicine clerkship

Vichai Senthong1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
,
Jarin Chindaprasirt1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
,
Kittisak Sawanyawisuth1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, ThailandCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Noppadol Aekphachaisawat2 Central Library, Silpakorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Suteeraporn Chaowattanapanit1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
,
Panita Limpawattana1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
,
Charoen Choonhakarn1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
&
Aumkhae Sookprasert1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
 show all
Pages 195-200 | Published online: 27 Sep 2013

References

  • ZibrowskiEMWestonWWGoldszmidtMA‘I don’t have time’: issues of fragmentation, prioritisation and motivation for education scholarship among medical facultyMed Educ20084287287818715484
  • DowningSMLieskaNGRaibleMDEstablishing passing standards for classroom achievement tests in medical education: a comparative study of four methodsAcad Med200378S85S8714557105
  • AngoffWHScales, norms, and equivalent scoresThorndikeRLEducational MeasurementWashington DCAmerican Council on Education1971508600
  • FowellSLFewtrellRMcLaughlinPJEstimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. Do discussion and iteration have an influence?Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract200813112416957872
  • YudkowskyRDowningSMPopescuMSetting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff methodAcad Med200883S13S1618820491
  • AhnDSAhnSReconsidering the cut score of Korean National Medical Licensing ExaminationJ Educ Eval Health Prof20074119224002
  • HessBSubhiyahRGGiordanoCConvergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinationsEval Health Prof20073036237517986670
  • YudkowskyRDowningSMWirthSSimpler standards for local performance examinations: the Yes/No Angoff and whole-test EbelTeach Learn Med20082021221718615294
  • BoursicotKARobertsTEPellGUsing borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schoolsMed Educ2007411024103117973762
  • KaufmanDMMannKVMuijtjensAMvan der VleutenCPA comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical educationAcad Med20007526727110724316
  • SiriwardenaANDixonHBlowCIrishBMilnePPerformance and views of examiners in the Applied Knowledge Test for the nMRCGP licensing examinationBr J Gen Pract200959e38e4319192366
  • WayneDBBarsukJHCohenEMcGaghieWCDo baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?Acad Med200782S105S10817895672
  • DowningSMTekianAYudkowskyRProcedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions educationTeach Learn Med200618505716354141
  • WayneDBCohenEMakoulGMcGaghieWCThe impact of judge selection on standard setting for a patient survey of physician communication skillsAcad Med200883S17S2018820492
  • VerhoevenBHVerwijnenGMMuijtjensAMScherpbierAJvan der VleutenCPPanel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated studentsMed Educ20023686086712354249
  • BoursicotKARobertsTEPellGStandard setting for clinical competence at graduation from medical school: a comparison of passing scores across five medical schoolsAdv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract20061117318316729244
  • VerheggenMMMuijtjensAMVan OsJSchuwirthLWIs an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract20081320321117043915
  • HurtzGMAuerbachMAA meta-analysis of the effects of modifications to the Angoff method on cutoff scores and judgment consensusEduc Psychol Meas200363584601
  • CulliganBItem Response Theory, Reliability and Standard Error Available from: http://www.wordengine.jp/research/pdf/IRT_reliability_and_standard_error.pdfAccessed June 7, 2013
  • LangenbucherJLabouvieEMorgensternJMeasuring diagnostic agreementJ Consult Clin Psychol199664128512898991315

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.