Positive margins (R1) risk factors in breast cancer conservative surgery

References

• JobsenJJ, RiemersmaS, van der PalenJ, OngF, JonkmanA, StruikmansH. The impact of margin status in breast-conserving therapy for lobular carcinoma is age related. Breast. 2018;42:3–9. Epub 2018 Jul 18. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.07.00730118902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarbyS, McGaleP, CorreaC, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–1716. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60984-722019144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FisherB, AndersonS, BryantJ, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa02215212393820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PovoskiSP, JimenezRE, WangWP, XuRX. Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:254. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-25419635166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DixonJM, ThomasJ, KerrGR, et al. A study of margin width and local recurrence in breast conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer. EJ Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(5):657–664. Epub 2016 Feb 18. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlandKI. Surgical margins in breast cancer: how wide? How accurate? How big? Does it make a difference?Curr Surg. 2001;58:248–253.11397481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TaghianA, MohiuddinM, JagsiR, GoldbergS, CeilleyE, PowellS. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–639. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000157272.04803.1b15798465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobsL. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1271–1272. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9766-018320287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuiniA, RososchanskyJ, GattiG, et al. The surgical margin status after breast-conserving surgery: discussion of an open issue. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113:397–402. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-9929-018386174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorrowM. Margins in breast-conserving therapy: have we lost sight of the big picture?Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008;8:1193–1196. doi:10.1586/14737140.8.8.119318699757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AzuM, AbrahamseP, KatzSJ, et al. What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:558–563. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1022-319847566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoranMS, SchnittSJ, GiulianoAE, et al. Society of surgical oncology – American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):704–716. Epub 2014 Feb 10. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3481-424515565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungA, GangiA, AmersiF, BoseS, ZhangX, GiulianoA. Impact of consensus guidelines by the society of surgical oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on margins for breast-conserving surgery in stages 1 and 2 invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl3):S422–S427. Epub 2015 Aug 27. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4829-026310280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YuJ, ElmoreLC, CyrAE, AftRL, GillandersWE, MargenthalerJA. Cost analysis of a surgical consensus guideline in breast-conserving surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(2):294–301. Epub 2017 Apr 14. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.02028414115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MerrillAL, CoopeySB, TangR, et al. Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast-conserving surgery: changes in reexcision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(3):729–734. Epub 2015 Oct 14. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4916-226467458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De CiccoC, PizzamiglioM, TrifiròG, et al. Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and surgical biopsy in breast cancer. Technical Aspects. QJNucl Med. 2002;46(2):145–151.
   Google Scholar
• MazehH, SagivI, KatzD, FreundHR, PeretzT, AllweisTM. Association between patient age, volume of breast tissue excised, and local recurrence. J Surg Res. 2013;181(2):187–192. Epub 2012 Jul 4. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.04322795351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristgenM, SteinemannD, KühnleE, et al. Lobular breast cancer: clinical, molecular and morphological characteristics. Pathol Res Pract. 2016;212(7):583–597. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2016.05.00227233940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MukhtarRA1, WongJ2, PiperM3, et al. Breast conservation and negative margins in invasive lobular carcinoma: the impact of oncoplastic surgery and shave margins in 358 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(11):3165–3170. Epub 2018 Jul 27. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6682-430054826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera-BadilloFE1, NapoleoneM, OcanaA, et al. Effect of multifocality and multicentricity on outcome in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):235–244. Epub 2014 Jun 14. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3018-324928527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar