37
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Changes in hospital performance after implementation of pay-for-performance in Japan

, &
Pages 17-23 | Published online: 20 Dec 2011

References

  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/index.html/. Accessed September 16, 2011. [Japanese].
  • Japan’s Central Social Insurance Medical Council. An investigative report on the effect of ‘quality assessment’ introduced in relation to the rehabilitation ward hospitalization fee. Japan’s Central Social Insurance Medical Council. 2010. [Japanese].
  • Jeong S, Kondo K, Inoue Y. Pay for Performance in USA and suggestion to Japan. Shakai Hoken Jyunpo. 2009;2397:20–25. [Japanese].
  • Christianson JB, Leatherman S, Sutherland K. Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(6 Suppl):5S–35S.
  • Jha AK, Orav EJ, Dobson A, Book RA, Epstein AM. Measuring efficiency: the association of hospital costs and quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(3):897–906.
  • Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):486–496.
  • Rosenthal MB. Beyond pay for performance–emerging models of provider-payment reform. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12): 1197–1200.
  • Granger CV Deutsch A, Linn RT. Rasch analysis of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) mastery test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(1):52–57.
  • Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
  • Jeong S, Kondo K, Shiraishi N, Inoue Y An evaluation of the quality of post-stroke rehabilitation in Japan. Clinical Audit. 2010;2:59–66.
  • Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226–1232.
  • Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(3):115–119.
  • Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):604–607.
  • Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–1096.
  • Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3393–3395.
  • Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200–215.
  • Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. About the FIM system. Available from: http://www.udsmr.org/WebModules/FIM/Fim_About.aspx. Accessed September 16, 2011.
  • Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. Report for the relation to the rehabilitation ward hospitalization fee. The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2009;467. [Japanese].
  • Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, Remmen R, Rosenthal MB, Sermeus W. Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.
  • Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(4):375–384.
  • Ryan AM. Effects of the premier hospital quality incentive demonstration on Medicare patient mortality and cost. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(3):821–842.
  • Niki R. Health care reform and rehabilitation medicine in the future. Community Rehabilitation. 2008;44:234–242. [Japanese].
  • Mehrotra A, Damberg CL, Sorbero ME, Teleki SS. Pay for performance in the hospital setting: what is the state of the evidence? Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(1):19–28.
  • Greene SE, Nash DB. Pay for performance: an overview of the literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(2):140–163.
  • Ashworth M, Seed P, Armstrong D, Durbaba S, Jones R. The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):441–448.
  • Crawley D, Ng A, Mainous AG, 3rd, Maj eed A, Millett C. Impact of pay for performance on quality of chronic disease management by social class group in England. J R Soc Med. 2009;102(3):103–107.
  • Karve AM, Ou FS, Lytle BL, Peterson ED. Potential unintended financial consequences of pay-for-performance on the quality of care for minority patients. Am Heart J. 2008;155(3):571–576.